Date: 18-01-2018
Business: By precipe.
Adv. Pawan Pandey for pltff present.
Heard LC for plaintiff.
Plaintiff has rightly reserves her right as per prayer clause 25(b) of the plaint in respect of the reliefs. Therefore, the leave sought by the plaintiff under Order-II, Rule - 2 of CPC is granted.
In view of urgency, the suit is now assigned to C.R.No.1.
LC for plaintiff tendered draft NM with supporting affidavit for injunction. TOR. Leave granted to register r/o next date.
Plaintiff is directed to remove the office objections, if any, within 4 weeks from today for suit to be registered.
Adjd for reply and hearing on Draft NM taken out by plaintiff for injunction on 02.02.18.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 02-02-2018
Date: 02-02-2018
Business: Adv. Pawan Pandey for pltff present.
Adv. Ganesh Murthy for D-1 present and filed V.P. for D-1. TOR
and marked as Exh.2. He waives the WOS on D-1.
LC for pltff tendered registered NM No.391/18 alongwith affidavit in support. TOR.
LC for plaintiff affidavit of service. TOR and marked as Exh.3.
As per Exh.3, all 6 defendants are served. D-2 to D-6 called absent. Therefore the NM to proceed ex-parte against defendant no.2 to 6.
Heard LC for plaintiff.
Till reply of D-1 is filed, the defendants are directed to maintain status-quo in respect of the suit property.
Plaintiff is directed to serve the WOS on defendants no.2 to 6 by speed POST/A.D. and simultaneously by Sheriffs office.
Adjd for service report (D-2 to 6) and hearing on Draft NM taken out by plaintiff for injunction on 22.03.18.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 22-03-2018
Date: 22-03-2018
Business: At 12.40 pm.
Adv. Pandey for pltff present.
Adv. Ganesh Murthy for D-1 absent.
NM 391/18 proceeded Ex-parte against D-2 to 6. Today also, none present for D-2 to 6. Plaintiff has not filed proof of service of WOS on D-2 to 6. D-1 has neither filed WS nor filed reply to the NM 391/18, therefore, suit to proceed without WS of D-1 and NM 391/18 without his reply.
The earlier order of status-quo to continue till next date.
LC for plaintiff submitted that the WOS are already sent by the department. Therefore, adjd for proof of service of WOS and hearing on NM 391/18 on 14.06.18.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 14-06-2018
Date: 14-06-2018
Business: None present for the plff.
Adv. Mr. Jamkhandi for D-1 present.
W.S tendered by deft no. 1. t.o.r.
The plff has failed to file affidavit of service of writ of summons to deft nos. 2 to 6.
Application filed by deft no. 1 for seeking permission for giving suit premises on leave and license basis. t.o.r. Plff to file say.
Matter adjd to 27.07.2018 for say to exh. 5 by the plff/ steps by the plf in respect of deft nos. 2 to 6 or for dismissal order against the plff/ N/M hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 27-07-2018
Date: 27-07-2018
Business: Adv. Mr. Pawan Pandey for the Plaintiff present.
Adv. C. J. Chavan for Defendant no. 3 present.
Adv. Mr. Ganesh Murthi for deft no. 1 present. (W.S )
Vakalatnama tendered by deft no. 3. t.o.r.
Draft Notice of Motion alongwith affidavit in support taken out by the deft No. 3 alongwith Written Statement for condonation of delay in filing W.S. t.o.r. The plff has given no objection to take on record W.S by deft no. 3 by condoning the delay caused. Hence draft N/M is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). Accordingly draft N/M stands disposed of and it be registered for statistical purpose.
In view of order passed in N/M, W.S of deft no. 3 be taken on record.
Written Statement tendered by deft no. 3. t.o.r.
Perused affidavit of service vide exh. 3. It appears that deft nos. 2 4 to 6 have been duly served with writ of summons, but they failed to appear. Hence exparte order is hereby passed against deft nos. 2 and 4 to 6.
Deft no. 1 has not pressed exh. 5 and submitted that he will take N/M for the same. Hence exh. 5 stands disposed of.
Earlier order shall continue till next date.
Matter is adjd. to 8.10.2018 for N/M hearing/ draft issues.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 08-10-2018
Date: 08-10-2018
Business: The Court is busy in dictating orders in Su nos. 10021/88 and 7485/83. Hence, board is discharged.
Matter is adjd. to 13.01.2019.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 28-11-2018
Date: 28-11-2018
Business: By precipe.
Adv. Mr. Pandey for the Plaintiff present.
Adv. Ms. Jeenal Savla for Defendant no. 1 present.
Defendant no. 3 present.
Exh.8Vakalatnama tendered by defendant no. 1. t.o.r. O-filed.
Exh.9Application tendered by the plff for withdrawing the suit against deft no. 2, 4, 5 and 6. t.o.r. Allowed as prayed.
It is submitted by adv for the plff that parties to the suit arrived at compromise and accordingly tendered consent terms.
Exh.10 Consent terms tendered by the plff, deft no. 1 and deft no. 3. t.o.r. Verified contents with the parties and their advocates and also verified signatures. Concerned advocates identified parties before the court. Hence, consent terms read and recorded.
In view of consent terms exh. 10, suit is hereby disposed of and decree be drawn up in view of consent terms exh. 10 Consequently N/M no. 391/18 stands disposed of.
Nature Of Disposal: CONSENT DECREE
Disposal Date: 28-11-2018
