Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 23 Jan 2018 · CNR MHCC010001462018
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: 1 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 34 OF 2018 CNRMHCC010001462018 IN L.C.SUIT NO. 1635 OF 2010 CNRMHCC010020642010 Glance Opticians )...Plaintiff. V/s. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai )...Defendants CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI. KISHORE M.JAISWAL (C.R. NO.08) DATE : 23/01/2018. Ld. Adv. Shri Bhosale for the plaintiff. Ld. Adv. Mrs. Tadavi for the defendants /MCGM ORAL ORDER This chamber summons is taken out by the plaintiff for amendment of the plaint which is supported by an affidavit . The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai has opposed the chamber summons by filing reply. 2. Heard learned advocates of both the sides. 3. The main suit is old one and this application for -- 1 of 4 -- amendment is taken out after long period. I have carefully perused the proposed amendment which is annexed to the schedule of chamber summons. The chamber summons is opposed firstly on the ground that three reliefs are claimed in the one chamber summons and secondly , if the chamber summons is allowed then the so called amendment would change the nature of the suit. On perusal of the prayer clause in the chamber summons , the prayer clause (b) and (c) seems to be the formal one in the sense that , it speaks of providing costs and other reliefs. Thus mainly chamber summons is only for amendment. 4. The main suit is challenging the notice issued under section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act ( in short 'MMC ' Act ). Admittedly, the suit is filed by the ground floor shops in the building including two stalls. It is submitted that, due to typographical error the Mezanine floor has being mentioned . From the documents on record, it appears that building is assessed to the property taxes. It is also the matter on record that the MCGM has issued the common circular to all the shops of the building. The learned advocate Shri Bhosale submitted that previously there was another advocate on record and there are some drafting errors which needs to be corrected for fair trial and proper adjudication of the case. It is trite law that for the mistake committed by the advocate, the litigant should not suffer . It is also submitted that the description of the notice structure has not been correctly and fully described in the original plaint and due to ignorance the notice structure is not properly described. On perusal of proposed amendment, those facts are necessary to be brought on record for deciding the real questions in controversy between the parties. To my mind, as the notice under section 351 of the MMC Act is challenged , the other description would be the matter of evidence and at this stage if the amendment is allowed then it is not going to change the nature of -- 2 of 4 -- the suit. The trial is not yet commenced. If the amendment is allowed then certainly the MCGM will get an opportunity to file the additional written statement, if any. To avoid multiplicity of the proceedings and further considering the provisions of order 6 rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code, this chamber summons needs to be allowed in the interest of justice. Hence I pass the following order. ORDER 1. Chamber summons no. 34 of 2018 is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. The plaintiff to carry out the amendment as per the schedule annexed to the chamber summons within two weeks and shall supply the copy of amended plaint upon the defendants within two weeks thereafter. 3. Chamber Summons is disposed of accordingly. (Kishore M. Jaiswal ) Asstt. Sessions Judge, Date:23/01/2018. City Civil & Sessions Court, Gr.Mumbai. Dictated on :23/01/2018. Transcribed on :24/01/2018. Signed on :24/01/2018. -- 3 of 4 -- “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” UPLOAD DATE: NAME OF STENOGRAPHER 05.02.2018 Mrs. V.V.Mhatre TIME:11.00 a.m. Name of the Judge ( With Court room no.) Shri Kishore M. Jaiswal (Court Room No.08) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGEMENT/ORDER 23/01/2018 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 24/01/2018 JUDGEMENT/ORDER uploaded on 05/02/2018 -- 4 of 4 --
