Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 04 Jan 2022 · CNR MHCC010001372020
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: Filed on :03.01.2020 Registered On :16.01.2020 Decided on :04.01.2022 Duration : Y-02/M-00/D-03 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 112 OF 2020 Exhibit- 07 CNR NO.- MHCC01-000137-2020 Varsha Gopal Talreja Adult, Indian Inhabitant of Bombay, aged 54 years carrying on business at 34, Dariya Mahal-A, 80, Nepeansea Road, Mumbai -400 006. ... Plaintiff V/s. 1. Rajesh Rasiklal Mehta Adult, Indian Inhabitant of Bombay, aged not known carrying on business in the name and style of R.R. Chem (India), a Proprietor Concern as its Sole Proprietor at C/401, Padmavati Nagar, Dumping Road, Mulund(W), Mumbai- 400 080. ...Defendants 2. Kanan Rajesh Mehta, Adult, Indian Inhabitant of Bombay, age not known carrying on business and -- 1 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.112/2020 2 residing at C/401, Padmavati Nagar, Dumping Road, Mulund(W), Mumbai- 400 080. Appearance:- Ms. Kavita Lalwani Advocate for the plaintiff. Exparte against Defendants. CORAM : HER HONOUR AD-HOC JUDGE SMT. A.H. KASHIKAR CITY CIVIL COURT, GR. BOMBAY (C.R. NO.61). DATE : 04/01/2022 JUDGMENT (Dictated and pronounced in Open Court.) 1. This is a summary suit instituted by the plaintiff under order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 against the defendant. 2. The suit claim of the plaintiff is narrated in nutshell as under: The Plaintiff is running business from the address given in the suit plaint. Defendant no.1 is carrying on the business in the name of R.R. Chem (India), a proprietary concern as a sole proprietor. Defendant no.2 is doing the business from the address given in the suit plaint. The defendant no.1 on dtd.8.6.2017 for valuable consideration of Rs.1,50,000/- received from plaintiff, drew a bill of exchange directing thereby, defendant no.2 to pay to the plaintiff or Order a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- on demand. Said bill of exchange was accepted and delivered by defendant no.2 to the plaintiff on the same day. The -- 2 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.112/2020 3 amount of Rs.1,50,000/- was advanced to the defendants by cheque dtd. 8.6.2017 bearing No.051056 of Rs.1,50,000/- drawn on Union Bank of India, Pedder Road, Mumbai. Accordingly, the defendants executed the bills of exchange in favour of plaintiff. They repaid the sum of Rs.1,25,000 /- to the plaintiff as per the details given in the suit plaint. The plaintiff thereafter presented demand bill of exchange to the defendant no.2 and then to defendant no.1 for payment of balance sum of Rs.25,000/-. The defendants dishonored the demand of bill of exchange by non payment. Therefore, the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the balance sum of Rs.25,000/- alongwith interest at the rate of 18% p.a. The plaintiff issued letter/notice through advocate on 19.9.2019 to the defendants calling upon them to pay the outstanding amount alongwith accrued interest but the defendants failed to comply with said requisition. The plaintiff averred that the defendants are liable jointly and severally to pay the outstanding amount of Rs.33,400/- as per the Memo of Particulars. 3. Thus, the plaintiff has filed the present suit against the defendants for recovery. It is averred that the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay a sum of Rs.33,400/- as per the Memo of Particulars to the plaintiff and further interest at the rate of 18% p.a on the principal amount of Rs.25,000/- from the date of suit till its realization. Hence, this suit. 4. The suit summons were duly served on the defendants. The defendants failed to appear though served with the suit summons. Hence, suit is posted for judgment as per order XXXVII Rule 2(3) of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 judgment against defendants. -- 3 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.112/2020 4 5. The following points arise for my determination and my findings thereon are as under for the reasons stated there under:- Sr. No. POINTS FINDINGS. 1. Whether the plaintiff entitled for recovery of amount against the defendants? A] If yes, what would be the rate of interest? Amount of Rs.33,400/- with interest @ 18% per annum on the principal amount 2. What order and decree? As per final order. REASONS 6. In order to establish the suit claim, the plaintiff has filed following documentary evidence below Exh.06 the list of documents: Sr. No. Description of documents Exhibits 1 Demand Bill of Exchange dated 8.6.2017 of Rs.1,50,000/- Exh. 6/1 2 Copy of Plaintiff’s Advocate’s letter dated 19.9.2019 alongwith Acknowledgment. Exh. 6/2 AS TO POINT NO.1: 7. This is a summary suit which is not contested by the defendants. The documents produced on record by the plaintiff shows that the defendants received the amount of Rs.1,50,000/- from the plaintiff drawing bill of exchange directing thereby defendant no.2 to pay to the plaintiff or order a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- on demand and said bill of exchange has been accepted and delivered by the defendant no.2 to the plaintiff. Further, it reveals from the record that said transaction -- 4 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.112/2020 5 took place on dtd.8.6.2017, the repayment is lastly made on dtd. 10.2.2018, the notice/letter of demand was issued to the defendants on dtd. 19.9.2019 and the suit is filed on 03.01.2020. As such, the plaintiff’s claim in the suit is well within limitation. 8. All the documents produced by the plaintiff at list Exhibit- 06 goes to establish that plaintiff has given amount of Rs.1,50,000/- to the defendants on bill of exchange. The defendants repaid the amount of Rs.1,25,000/-. The remaining dues against the defendants are Rs.25,000/-. The plaintiff is claiming Rs.33,400/- which is the amount calculated with interest at the rate of 18% p.m till the date of filing of the suit. Said amount is not repaid by any of the defendants. Therefore, defendants are liable jointly and severally to pay the outstanding amount of Rs.33,400/- to the plaintiff. In this background, I have arrived at the conclusion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover sum of Rs.33,400/- from the defendants jointly and severally. 9. According to the plaintiff the outstanding dues against the defendants is Rs.33,400/- and said amount is calculated alongwith with interest at the rate of 18% p.m till the filing of the suit. Apart from said amount which is due against the defendant on the date of filing of the suit, the plaintiff has claimed interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the principal amount. As per section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure the rate of interest may exceed 6% per annum, if the transaction is commercial and there is no contract pertaining to the same between the parties. In the present case the transaction is a commercial one and there is contract existing between the parties as to the rate of interest which shall be levied. As per the agreed terms -- 5 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.112/2020 6 defendant is liable to pay the interest at the rate of 18% p.a. Therefore, I hold, the rate of interest at the rate of 18% per annum would be just and proper to be awarded on the principal sum of Rs.25,000/- . Hence, point no.1 is answered in the affirmative. AS TO POINT NO.2: 10. In view of discussion and finding on point no.1, it is held that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.33,400/- from the defendants3 jointly and severally with interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the principal sum of Rs.25,000/- from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. Plaintiff is also entitled to recover cost of the suit from the defendants. Hence, in answered to point no.2, I proceed to pass the following order. ORDER 1. The defendants shall pay Rs.33,400/- (Rs. Thirty Three Thousand Four Hundred Only) to the plaintiff jointly and severally, with interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the principal sum of Rs.25,000/- from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. 2. The defendants do pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff. 3. Court fee, if any, be refunded as per the rules. 4. Decree be drawn accordingly. (A.H. Kashikar) AD-HOC Judge, City Civil Court, Date : 4.1.2022 Gr. Bombay Dictated on : 4.1.2022 Typed on : 4.1.2022 Signed on : 5.1.2022 -- 6 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.112/2020 7 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 5.1.2022 2.00p .m. ( K.M. Rana ) UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court room No.) HHJ Smt. A.H. Kashikar (C.R.No.61) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 4.1.2022 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O.on 5.1.2022 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 5.1.2022 -- 7 of 7 --
