Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 23 Apr 2025 · CNR MHCC010000842019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: MHCC010000842019 Presented on 03/01/2019 Registered on 24/04/2019 Decided on 23/04/2025 Duration 06Y: 03M: 20D Exhibit 15 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT AT MAZGAON, MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 499 OF 2019 M/s. Chetana Stationery ] a division of Chetana Publication Pvt. Ltd., ] Having its registered office at 263-C, Khatau ] Wadi, Behind Central Cinema, Goregaonkar Lane, ] Girgaon, Mumbai-400 004. ]...Plaintiff V/s. Umesh Patil ] an adult, age not known, Proprietor of ] M/s. Shri Mahalaxmi Stationery C/o. Anandsagar ] Public School, Mani Rajauri Road, Chinchani, ] Tasagaon, Sangli, Maharashtra-414312. ]...Defendant Appearance:- Ld. Advocate Madhuri Lakhani for the plaintiff. Defendant absent (Ex-parte). CORAM : HHJ SHRI SANGRAM SHRIHARI SHINDE C. R. NO. : 81 DATE : 23/04/2025 JUDGMENT ( Dictated and pronounced in open Court) 01. This suit is filed under Rule 2 of Order XXXVII of Code of Civil procedure, 1908 (CPC) for recovery of amount of Rs. 2,55,615/- -- 1 of 8 -- 2 Sum Su No.499/2019 along with further interest. Brief facts of the plaintiff’s case may be summarized as under: 02. The plaintiff is a registered company having its registered office on the mentioned address in the title clause. The plaintiff is carrying on business of selling educational books. The defendant is the proprietor of M/s. Mahalaxmi Stationery. The plaintiff has sold and supplied Books to defendant as per order placed by defendant. The said books were sold, supplied and delivered through transporter M/s. Anupam Transport during the period July 2015 to March 2016. Accordingly, plaintiff has raised invoices from time to time. Defendant used to make payment from time to time in respect of the goods. Defendant had issued certain cheques which were dishonoured therefore, plaintiff bank has debited a sum of Rs. 3,750/- towards bank charges. The said amount is debited in the defendant’s account. The plaintiff has filed complaint u/s. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act against defendant. Defendant failed to pay sum of Rs. 1,70,653/- being the balance of invoice No.587.01 dated 14/03/2016 for sum of Rs. 6,44,217/-. The plaintiff requested defendant to repay the said balance amount however, defendant failed to pay the said balance amount. Therefore, plaintiff issued notice dated 02/05/2011 through his advocate and called upon defendant to make the payment of Rs. 1,74,403/- including bank charges. The said notice is received by defendant however, neither he filed reply nor paid the balance amount. Therefore, plaintiff is entitled for an amount of Rs.2,55,615/- including interest. The plaintiff is entitled for further interest at the rate of 18% p.a. Hence, this suit. 03. The defendant appeared in the matter on 18/10/2019 and filed an application for condonation of delay at Exh. 6. It is observed in roznama dated 23/09/2022 that defendant was directed to take out -- 2 of 8 -- 3 Sum Su No.499/2019 notice of motion for condonation of delay in view of roznama dated 11/07/2022. However, defendant failed to take steps therefore, order was passed on 23/09/2022 to proceed matter exparte against defendant. 04. Further, on perusing contentions of the plaintiff and documents on record, following points arose for my consideration, to which my findings are recorded for reasons given below. Sr. No. Points Findings 1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover amount of Rs.2,55,615/- from defendant? If yes, at what rate interest ? Yes, the plaintiff is entitled to simple interest on the amount of Rs. 1,70,653/- at the rate of 7% p.a. from 03/01/2019 i.e. the date of filing the suit till its full realization. 2. What order and decree? As per final order. 05. In support of claim, the plaintiff has filed affidavit of claim of Mr. Shaji V. John, Authorized Signatory of the plaintiff at Exh. 6 as P.W.1 and reiterated his contention in the plaint for recovery of Rs. 2,55,615/- along with the further interest at the rate of 18% p.a. from defendant. The plaintiff has filed and relied upon the following documents. Sr. No. Exhibit Particulars 1 Exh.8 Office copy of Invoice No.15/587.01 dated 14.03.2016. 2 Exh.9 Copy of ledger account of the defendant from 01.04.2015 to 10.11.2019. 3 Exh.10 Office Copy of notice dated 02.05.2018 from plaintiffs advocate to the defendants. 4 Exh.14 Certificate u/s. 65B of Indian Evidence Act -- 3 of 8 -- 4 Sum Su No.499/2019 R E A S O N S As to points No. 1 and 2 :- 06. Perused plaint, oral and documentary evidence on record. Hd. Learned counsel for the plaintiff. As per plaintiff, defendant is proprietor of M/s. Mahalaxmi Stationery. Further, as per orders placed by defendant, plaintiff used to supply and deliver educational books to defendant through transport. It is the specific contention of plaintiff that from July 2015 to March 2016, he has sold, supplied and delivered goods to the defendant. It is the contention of plaintiff that he had sold, goods to the tune of Rs. 6,44,217/- as per purchase order placed by defendant. Accordingly, plaintiff raised invoice bearing No. 15/587.01 dated 14/03/2016 at Exh. 8. On perusing said invoice, it appears that it bears seal and signature of defendant. Further, it substantiate the contention of plaintiff that he has sold books to defendant. 07. Further, plaintiff has stated that defendant paid amounting from time to time however, he failed to pay balance amount of Rs. 1,70,653/-. It has come in the evidence of plaintiff that defendant had issued cheques to plaintiff to pay the balance amount however, said cheques were dishnoured. Therefore, plaintiff bank has debited an amount of Rs. 3,750/-. The plaintiff has included said bank charges in the balance amount due and payable by defendant to the plaintiff. Therefore, it is the contention of plaintiff that balance amount of Rs. 1,70,653/- and amount of Rs. 3,750/- towards bank charges, total amounting to Rs. 1,74,403/- is due and payable by defendant. Plaintiff in order to substantiate said contention has filed extract of Ledger Account at Exh. 9 a/w. Certificate u/s. 65 B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act at Exh. 14. Thus, on perusing said extract of Ledger Account, it appears that an amount of Rs. 1,74,403/- is payable by -- 4 of 8 -- 5 Sum Su No.499/2019 defendant. 08. As per plaintiff, as defendant failed to pay said outstanding amount therefore, he issued letter dated 02/05/2018 at Exh. 10 to defendant through advocate by RPAD. Further, though said letter is received by defendant, he has neither paid balance amount to the plaintiff nor replied to the notice. Therefore, as per contention of plaintiff he is entitled for interest at the rate of 18% p.a. on outstanding amount till the date of filing of the suit and as a further interest till its realization. The plaintiff is claiming said interest on the basis of terms and conditions in the invoice at Exh. 8. It is pertinent to note that invoice at Exh. 8, it is mentioned that if payment is made after 30 days interest at the rate of 24% p.a. will be charges. Defendant has not challenged and contested the matter. Hence, evidence of plaintiff has remained unchallenged. Therefore, I am of the view that plaintiff is entitled for interest at the rate of 18% p.a. from 14/03/2016 till the date of filing of the suit. Thus, plaintiff is entitled for an amount of Rs. 2,55,615/- including interest. 09. So far as prayer of further interest on the said amount is concerned, the plaintiff has claimed 18% p.a. interest on the said amount as per terms in invoice. However, it appears that the rate of interest claimed by plaintiff is excessive in nature as compare to the rate of Nationalized Bank. Therefore, I am of view that in view of Section 34 of Civil Procedure Code, it would be just and proper to grant further interest at the rate of 7% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. The invoice is dated 14/03/2016 and suit is filed on 03/01/2019 therefore, suit is within limitation. Further, in view of terms and condition in invoice this Court has jurisdiction. Hence, I answer point No. 1 in the affirmative. In the result, in answer -- 5 of 8 -- 6 Sum Su No.499/2019 to point No. 2, I proceed to pass the following order. O R D E R 1] The Summary Suit No. 499 of 2019 is decreed with costs. 2] The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff an amount of Rs.2,55,615/-(Rupees Two Lakhs Fifty Five Thousand Six Hundred and Fifteen only). 3] The plaintiff is entitled to simple interest on the amount of Rs. 1,70,653/- at the rate of 7% p.a. from 03/01/2019 i.e. the date of filing the suit till its full realization. 4] The plaintiff may be entitled to get refund of the court-fees paid by them, if any provided for in rules. 5] The decree shall be drawn accordingly. (Sangram S. Shinde) Adhoc Judge, City Civil Court Mazgaon, Mumbai. Dated: 23/04/2025 Court Room No.81 Dictated on: 23/04/2025 Corrected & signed on: 24/04/2025 -- 6 of 8 -- 7 Sum Su No.499/2019 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE NAME OF STENOGRAPHER 25/04/2025 Mrs. V. V. Malgaonkar Name of the Judge (with Court Room No.) Shri S. S. Shinde C.R. No.81 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ ORDER 23/04/2025 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P. O. on 24/04/2025 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 25/04/2025 -- 7 of 8 -- 8 Sum Su No.499/2019 -- 8 of 8 --
