Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 21 Nov 2019 · CNR MHCC010000502019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: NM 20-19 in S.C.Suit No. 18-2019 1 Date : 21.11.2019 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 20 OF 2019 IN S.C. SUIT NO. 18 OF 2019 (CNR NO.MHCC010000502019 ) Nalini Mahendra Thacker .. Plaintiff Versus Mr. Kamal Mahendra Thacker .. Defendant Appearances : Adv.Sanjay T.Manek for plaintiff present. Adv.Narendra Gharat for defendant present. Coram : His Honour Judge Shri. A.H.Laddhad Additional Judge CR No. : 7 Date : 21.11.2019 ORDER 1. The plaintiff has filed instant Notice of Motion seeking following reliefs : a) That pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit defendant be directed and ordered by a mandatory order and injunction to erect a partition wall between living rooms of Flat No. 1501 and 1502 as it originally stood and as shown in the Floor Plan Exh. G hereto by -- 1 of 9 -- NM 20-19 in S.C.Suit No. 18-2019 2 Date : 21.11.2019 Red Colour Line, as also open an entrance door of Flat No. 1502 from the common passage of 15th Floor, as it originally stood as shown by Green Colour on the Plan Exh. G hereto. In the alternative Plaintiff be permitted to erect a participation wall between living rooms of Flat No. 1501 and 1502 as it originally stood and as shown in the Floor Plan Exh. G hereto by Red Colour Line, as also open an entrance door of Flat No. 1502 from the common passage of 15th Floor, as it originally stood as shown by Green Colour on the Plan Exh.G hereto. b) That pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit this Hon’ble Court be pleased to appoint a suitable person as a Court Commissioner for the purpose of visiting the said Flat No. 1501 and 1502 and ascertain the correct position of partition wall and entrance door of Flat No. 1502, with a power to take photographs and report about the same to this Hon’ble Court, and such commissioner be directed to erect a partition wall between living rooms of Flat No. 1501 and 1502 as it originally stood and as shown in the floor Plan Exh.G hereto by Red Colour Line, as also open an entrance door of Flat No. 1502 from the common passage of 15th Floor, as it originally stood as shown by Green Colour on the Plan Exh.G hereto at the cost of defendant and / or plaintiff as this Hon’ble Court thinks fit and proper. -- 2 of 9 -- NM 20-19 in S.C.Suit No. 18-2019 3 Date : 21.11.2019 c) (i) Pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit defendant his servants, agents and person claiming by from under of through him be restrained by a temporary order and injunction from dispossessing the plaintiff from the suit premises or interfering with or disturbing plaintiff’s use occupation and possession of the suit premises viz. Flat no. 1502 alongwith the said Reserved Car Parking Space No. S114 and plaintiffs right to ingress and egress from the entrance of the said Flat No. 1501 in any manner what so ever, till the actual erection of partition wall between living rooms of Flat No. 1501 and 1502 as it originally stood and as shown in the Floor Plan Exh.G hereto by Red Colour Line, as also opening an entrance door of Flat No. 1502 from the common passage 15th Floor, as it originally stood as shown by Green Colour on the Plan Exh.G hereto takes place. d) Pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit, the defendant and / or person claiming by from under or through him be restrained by an order and injunction of this Hon’ble Court from selling transferring, alienating, encumbering, creating third party rights of any nature whatsoever, in respect of the Suit premises vis.Flat No. 1502 alongwith the said Reserved Car Parking Space No. S114. e) Adinterim and Interim reliefs in terms of prayer clause (a) to (d) above. -- 3 of 9 -- NM 20-19 in S.C.Suit No. 18-2019 4 Date : 21.11.2019 f) For such other and further reliefs as the nature and circumstances of this case may require. g) Cost of the Notice of Motion may provide for. 2. It is contended by the plaintiff that she has filed suit against the defendant for injunction, restraining the defendant from disturbing her peaceful possession in the suit flat. It is contended by the plaintiff that defendant is her son. Her husband Shri. Mahendra Shivji Thacker died on 24.01.2018. During lifetime of her husband he has purchased several properties in Mumbai. The suit premises bearing Flat No. A1502, AWing, situated on 15 th floor, “Polaris” Building, Nirmal Galaxy, L.B.S.Marg, Mulund (West) Mumbai – 400 080 was acquired by the plaintiff and shw is the sole and exclusive owner occupier and in possession of the aforesaid suit flat. 3. It is contended by the plaintiff that Flat No. A1501 admeasuring about 1001 sq. ft. and suit Flat No. 1502 admeasuring about 758 sq. ft. are adjacent flats. In the suit flat she is the first purchaser and in Flat No. A1501, she is the second purchaser whereas, the defendant is the second purchaser in the suit flat and first purchaser in suit flat No. 1501. 4. It is contended by the plaintiff that defendant in his own wisdom demolished partition wall between living room of Flat No. A1501 and A1502 and the converted both the living room of the said flats in single hall. Inspite of specific request and objection, -- 4 of 9 -- NM 20-19 in S.C.Suit No. 18-2019 5 Date : 21.11.2019 the defendant close the common entrance of Flat No. 1502 leading from common passage of 15th Floor and kept single common entrance of flats having opening from original door Flat No. 1501. 5. It is contended by the plaintiff that the defendant married in the year 2017 and therefore, under influence of his wife, started harassing and torturing the plaintiff and her younger daughter Heenal on one count or other. The defendant just after 6 months of death of her husband started demanding money from the plaintiff, failing which defendant and his wife threatened her with dire consequences including filing false complaint under Section 498 of IPC and to put her in behind bar. It is alleged by the plaintiff that defendant demanded 20,00,000/ for the purpose of speculation in the share market. On failure of the said amount, he has started abusing and threatening to dispossess her and her daughter from the suit premises. Therefore, the plaintiff on 16.06.2018 filed complaint with the Mulund Police Station. 6. It is further contended by the plaintiff that on 16.12.2018 when she was attempting to enter her shop premises situated at Mandakini Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., Model Town, Mulund (West), Mumbai – 400 080, the defendant assaulted her and abused her and prevented her from entering the shop unless she fulfill the demand of defendant. Therefore, on 16.12.2018 she lodged the FIR against her son at Mulund Police Station. Thus, due to the conduct of the defendant, the plaintiff is very much disturbed mentally and sustained physical injury. Therefore, -- 5 of 9 -- NM 20-19 in S.C.Suit No. 18-2019 6 Date : 21.11.2019 plaintiff is having apprehension that she would be dispossessed out of the suit premises at the hands of defendants. 7. It is contended by the plaintiff that suit flat is acquired by her and her husband. Out of their earning and savings. She is co owner of the suit flat. Flat No. 1502 is smaller having area admeasuring about 758 sq. ft. than Flat No. 1501 which is having area of 1001 ssq. ft. Both the units are separate and in order to living harmoniously and peacefully, it is necessary to construct partition wall as per the Plan, dividing both the units. Therefore, plaintiff filed instant Notice of Motion and praying for allowing the same. 8. The defendant opposed the Notice of Motion by filing say. The defendant adopted the pleadings of his Written Statement. The defendant resisted the suit of the plaintiff by filing Written Statement cum Counter Claim. It is contended by the defendant that both the flats were purchased out of his earnings. The plaintiff is house wife, she did not have any source of income. The property purchased in her name is by way of ‘Benamdar’. The plaintiff have no right, title and interest to claim an exclusive use, share and interest in the suit property. Therefore, defendant prayed for dismissal of the Notice of Motion. 9. Heard both the sides. Perused Notice of Motion as well as Written Statement. The plaintiff in order to substantiate her contention filed Sale Deed dated 29.12.2002 of both the -- 6 of 9 -- NM 20-19 in S.C.Suit No. 18-2019 7 Date : 21.11.2019 Apartment, appears to be purchased in the joint name. The documents pertaining to the outgoing expenses in respect of Flat No. 1502 bearing name of the plaintiff. The Plan annexed to the Sale Deed clearly shows that both the flats are separate units and separable by erecting common wall. The defendant although denied that the flats purchased out of funds of the plaintiff, but did not dispute the relationship and also the possession of plaintiff in flat no. 1502. It appears that there is domestic dispute between the parties. Both the parties are blood relatives. In my view, in order to keep peace and harmony between them it is very much essential to put a wall in between two flats so that parties can live peaceful life. The issue that property is ‘Benamdar’ and the defendant has spent money to purchase both the flats is triable issue. In the event at the end of the trial if, the defendant succeed, appropriate orders of eviction can be passed but looking to the dispute between the parties, in my view, it is necessary to allow the present Notice of Motion by granting Adinterim relief. Thus, I proceed to pass the following order : ORDER 1. Notice of Motion No. 20 of 2019 is hereby made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Both the parties to bear cost of erection of wall in equal proportion. -- 7 of 9 -- NM 20-19 in S.C.Suit No. 18-2019 8 Date : 21.11.2019 3. Parties to bear cost of Notice of Motion. 4. Notice of Motion No. 20 of 2019 is disposed off accordingly. (A.H.Laddhad) Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Dated : 21.11.2019 Greater Bombay. Dictated on : 21.11.2019 Typed on : 21.11.2019 Draft Submitted on : 21.11.2019 Checked on : 22.11.2019 Signed on : 22.11.2019 -- 8 of 9 -- NM 20-19 in S.C.Suit No. 18-2019 9 Date : 21.11.2019 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 25/11/2019 at 4.00 p.m. (Ms. V.V.Sawant) UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court room no.) Shri A.H.LADDHAD (C.R. No.7) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ ORDER 21/11/2019 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 23/11/2019 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 25/11/2019 -- 9 of 9 --
