Full Order Text
Final Order 3 · 18 Aug 2023 · CNR DLST010076242023
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE (SPECIAL FAST TRACK COURT), SOUTH DISTRICT SAKET COURTS: NEW DELHI Bail application No. 1309/2023 State v. Tukki Pahalwan FIR No. 386/2023 P.S. Mehrauli U/s 147/148/149/323/341/308/427/34 IPC 18.08.2023 This is an application u/s 438 Cr.P.C seeking anticipatory bail moved on behalf of accused / applicant Tukki Pahalwan. Present : Shri Arun Kumar Singh, Ld. Addl. PP for State. Sh. Naveen Chechi and Sh. Tejpal Yadav, Ld. Counsels for applicant/accused. Sh. Ajay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for complainant Reply filed. Arguments heard. Ld. Counsel for applicant has argued that the present FIR was registered u/s 308/34 IPC. As per the FIR, the complainant was discharged from the hospital on the same day. The parties are relatives and neighbours. There are cross FIRs against each other. Both parties have settled the matter. The applicant has already joined in the investigation and ready to cooperate in the investigation as and when called by the IO. Co- accused who was in JC has already been granted bail. The applicant is apprehending arrest by the police. Nothing is to be recovered from or at the instance of the applicant. The applicant undertakes to abide by terms and conditions of bail. Hence, it is prayed that the applicant/accused may be granted anticipatory bail. Ld. Prosecutor has argued that merely because the parties have settled the matter, it cannot be a ground to grant Bail application No. 1309/23 State v. Tukki Pehalwan Page No. 1 of 4 -- 1 of 4 -- anticipatory bail as the injured has sustained head injury which was caused by stone and considering the serious allegations, the applicant may not be granted anticipatory bail. This Court has considered the submissions and perused the record. Police file perused. In the FIR, complainant Sagar has alleged that on 26.07.2023 at about 10.30 p.m., when he came to his house after duty, he found his maternal uncle Jawala Singh, Ajit, Ajit’s son's Deepak’s wife Sapna and his mother Babita were standing outside the house in the gali. Prior to that, Titu s/o Ramesh and his wife Jyoti were making allegations on character of Deepak’s wife. Titu and Jyoti were standing. Suddenly Titu pushed his mama Jawala and abused him and Jyoti also abused Jawala. In the meantime, Titu’s brother Sonu and Deepak s/o Vinod reached there and Deepak picked a brick and hit on complainant’s head. Deepak and Sonu also caught hold of him and gave beatings to him. Tukki Pahalwan came to the spot, he went to his house, brought sticks (lathis) and gave sticks to Titu, Deepak and Sonu. After hearing the noise, family members and relatives of complainant came in the gali. During this time, Titu’s relatives namely Abhishek s/o Motu and Arun s/o Ramesh also came with sticks. When they all started beating the complainant and his family and relatives, the complainant and his family started to run away. On this, the aforesaid accused persons started pelting stones. In the meantime, Sonu s/o Hari Singh, Sagar s/o Tukki Pehlwan, Aneez s/o Ram Prasad, Lakhan Dhudka, Bahadur Raghuveer, Kapil s/o Hukam, Bhura s/o Ramesh, Rahul and Sunil s/o Jai Hind started pelting stones upon the complainant and his family. The complainant and his family also pelted stones Bail application No. 1309/23 State v. Tukki Pehalwan Page No. 2 of 4 -- 2 of 4 -- upon the opposite party in order to save themselves. Somebody called the PCR. The police came and took the injured to hospital. The police file would show that there is only one injured in this case i.e. complainant Sagar. As per MLC, he has sustained head injury. This head injury, as per FIR, was allegedly caused to him by Deepak and thereafter, he was held by Deepak and Sonu and they both assaulted him. There is no injury caused to any family members of the complainant. There is prima facie nothing in FIR to show that Tukki Pehlalwan, Abhishek s/o Motu, Arun s/o Ramesh, Setu s/o Hari Singh, Sagar s/o Tukki Pehalwan, Anoj s/o Ram Prasad, Lakhan, Raghuveer, Kapil, Bhura, Rahul and Sunil shared common intention with accused Sonu and Deepak to cause head injury to complainant Sagar. On inquiry, IO has informed that the applicant has joined the investigation. As per allegations in the FIR, Tukki Pehalwan allegedly brought lathis from his house and gave it to Titu, Deepak and Sonu and when all were about to hit the complainant and his family with lathi, complainant and his family started to run away. There is nothing in the FIR to show that any injury was caused by Tukki Pehalwan to complainant Sagar or to any of his family member. Tukki Pehalwan had allegedly came to the spot after complainant Sagar had already sustained head injury after being hit on his head with brick by Deepak. The applicant has already joined investigation with the IO. In these facts and circumstances, the application is allowed and in the event of arrest, applicant/accused Tukki Pehalwan is directed to be released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety of the like amount to Bail application No. 1309/23 State v. Tukki Pehalwan Page No. 3 of 4 -- 3 of 4 -- the satisfaction of IO / SHO/ Ld. MM/ Ld. Duty MM with the directions that he shall cooperate in the investigation as and when called by the IO and he shall not contact/ influence any witness in any manner. Nothing discussed herein-above shall amount to expression of opinion on the merits of the case. The application u/s 438 CrPC is accordingly allowed and disposed of. Copy of order be given dasti to all concerned. Order be uploaded on the Saket District Court website. (NEHA) ASJ / Spl. FTC/South District/18.08.2023 Bail application No. 1309/23 State v. Tukki Pehalwan Page No. 4 of 4 -- 4 of 4 --
