Skip to main content
CC NI ACT - Complaint Case 138 NI Act

FEDRAL BANKVsSONU LOHIA

CNR DLSH020142862026762-Judicial Magistrate First Class-02
Karkardooma Shahdara, CMM Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 23 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
1148/2026
Registration Date
24 Jul 2026
Next Hearing Date
10 Dec 2026
Case Stage
Misc./ Appearance

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1FEDRAL BANK

    Respondent

    1. 1SONU LOHIA

    Acts & Sections

    1
    NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT · Sec Section138

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    Anand Vihar Railway Station
    FIR Number / Year
    0

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 31-07-2026
Business: time sought by counsel for  comp.
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 10-12-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 14286/2026
Filing Date: 15-07-2026
eFiling Number: ADL20240010663C202600034
eFiling Date: 14-07-2026
First Hearing Date: 31st July 2026
Court Number And Judge: 762-Judicial Magistrate First Class-02

    Orders

    2
    Interim Order 1
    31 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 24
CC NI ACT/1148/2026
FEDRAL BANK Vs. SONU LOHIA
(Anand ViharRailway Station)
31.07.2026
Fresh case u/s 138 NI Act received by way of assignment. Let it be
checked and registered.
Present: Dr. Nityanand Singh, counsel for complainant through VC.
Matter is listed for consideration.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in judgment dated 25.09.2025 in
Criminal Appeal No. 1755/2010 titled “Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S.Borcar and Anr”
has directed that “there shall be no requirement to issue summons to the accused in
terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the precognizance stage.” Accordingly, pre
cognizance arguments stands dispensed with.
Perusal of complaint reveals that the legal demand notice was not
delivered upon the accused person.
At the request of counsel for complainant, some time is granted to enable
the complainant to clarify regarding the complete address of accused by placing on
record some Govt. issued ID card of the accused showcasing his address.
Put up on 10.12.2026.
(ABHINAV AHLAWAT)
JMFC02/SHD/KKD COURTS
DELHI/31.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    31 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 24
CC NI ACT/1148/2026
FEDRAL BANK Vs. SONU LOHIA
(Anand ViharRailway Station)
31.07.2026
Fresh case u/s 138 NI Act received by way of assignment. Let it be
checked and registered.
Present: Dr. Nityanand Singh, counsel for complainant through VC.
Matter is listed for consideration.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in judgment dated 25.09.2025 in
Criminal Appeal No. 1755/2010 titled “Sanjabij Tari Vs. Kishore S.Borcar and Anr”
has directed that “there shall be no requirement to issue summons to the accused in
terms of Section 223 of BNSS i.e., at the precognizance stage.” Accordingly, pre
cognizance arguments stands dispensed with.
Perusal of complaint reveals that the legal demand notice was not
delivered upon the accused person.
At the request of counsel for complainant, some time is granted to enable
the complainant to clarify regarding the complete address of accused by placing on
record some Govt. issued ID card of the accused showcasing his address.
Put up on 10.12.2026.
(ABHINAV AHLAWAT)
JMFC02/SHD/KKD COURTS
DELHI/31.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.