Skip to main content
Court Order

Interim Order 2

CNR DLSH02003956202613 Mar 2026
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Interim Order 2 · 13 Mar 2026 · CNR DLSH020039562026

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 1 CC NI Act No. 297/2026
SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED Vs. Parmeet Singh
PS Seema Puri
13.03.2026
Present: Sh. Manish Dewan, Ld. Counsel for complainant alongwith AR
of complainant in person.
Matter is at the stage of consideration on present complaint.
In terms of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in
‘Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr.’, pronounced on 25.09.2025, in
Criminal Appeal No.1755/2010, requirement for issuing notice u/s 223 BNSS to
proposed accused stands dispensed with.
E-filing history has been filed on behalf of the complainant. Taken
on record.
Pre-summoning Evidence by way of affidavit has been filed on
behalf of the complainant. Original documents have been filed on record along
with complaint. Statement of the complainant/ AR of complainant at pre-
summoning stage stands dispensed with in terms of judgment of Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India in ‘A. C. Narayanan v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
[(2014) 11 SCC 790]’.
Arguments on point of summoning have been heard. File has
been perused. All the statutory requirements under NI Act are complied with.
The present complaint case is filed within period of limitation. On examination of
documents filed along with the present complaint, the Court is satisfied that
prima facie offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act is made out
against the accused. Hence, I take cognizance of the offence punishable under
Section 138 N.I. Act, 1881.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Issue summons to the accused on filing of PF, RC and speed post
as well as by electronic mode details (WhatsAPP and E-mail). Summons may
be served by way of affixation in case the premises of the accused are found
locked or if the summons could not be served personally or upon a adult family
member. Steps be taken within two weeks. Complainant is directed to supply
the complete set of documents filed in the court including the pre-summoning
evidence affidavit of complainant. Ahlmad is directed to issue the summons only
after ensuring that the same has been done.
Ahlmad is directed to make the endorsement on the summons in
terms of the guidelines of Hon’ble Supreme Court passed in ‘Damodar S.
Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H. [(2010) 5 SCC 663]’. Ahlmad is directed to mention
the official e-mail ID and VC Link of this Court on the summons.
Put up for appearance of the accused and further proceedings on
22.05.2026.
(ARUSHI PARWAL)
JMFC – Evening Court No. 4/ Shahdara District
KKD/Delhi/13.03.2026
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.