Full Order Text
Interim Order 3 · 09 Jan 2024 · CNR DLSH010074542023
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: I.A. No. 01/2023 S.C. No. 360/2023 FIR No. 458/2023 U/s 498-A/304-B/34 IPC Police Station: Harsh Vihar State vs. Jitin Video Conferencing Link of the Court is functional. 09.01.2024 Order on Bail Application Present: Shri Pradeep Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State. Shri Ravinder Kumar, Ld.Counsel for accused/applicant Shri Amit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for complainant Parents of victim in person. IO/Insp. Vineet in person. 1. This is an application u/s 439 Cr.P.C for grant of regular bail moved on behalf of applicant/accused. 2. Reply is already on record. 3. It is stated by Ld. Defence counsel that accused/applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case by parents of deceased/victim. It is stated that accused/applicant has been undergoing judicial custody since 07.08.2023. It is stated that investigation of the present case is complete and chargesheet stands filed. It is stated that matter is pending at the stage of consideration on Charge. It is stated that deceased was never harassed or humiliated at the hands of accused/applicant and no dowry demand was ever made by the accused/applicant. It is stated that trial of the present case may take long time and due to this reason accused/applicant cannot be incarcerated for any further period. It is stated that accused/applicant shall abide by all the conditions imposed by the Court, if ordered to be released on bail. -- 1 of 3 -- -2- 4. The bail application has been opposed by Ld. Addl. PP for State assisted by IO arguing that there are serious allegations against the accused/applicant and therefore, his bail application be dismissed. 5. Submissions heard. Record perused. 6. This Court has carefully perused the statement of complainant Raj Kumari recorded by the Executive Magistrate, Seemapuri which resulted in registration of FIR. It must be noted that there are allegations not only against accused/applicant but there are similar allegations against five other family members of accused/applicant to have caused harassment of deceased/victim for demand of dowry. 7. The marriage of victim with accused/applicant was solemnized on 14.05.2021 and the victim committed suicide on 06.08.2023. 8. There are categorical allegations against accused/applicant for demand of cash amount and a motorcycle. It is also the allegation that accused/applicant used to extends beatings to her. Prosecution has also relied upon the statements of witnesses other than complainant. Further, there appears another angle to the alleged dispute between husband and wife. It is the argument of Ld. Defence counsel that victim had an extra marital affair and she was counselled to stay away from the said person. He has also relied upon an audio-video footage of the victim allegedly admitting such a relationship. It is noted that the said footage is not part of the chargesheet and was never handed over to the IO for confirming its authenticity during investigation. It is observed that such unverified audio-video footage cannot be relied upon to grant the benefit of bail -- 2 of 3 -- -3- to accused/applicant. Further, the argument that victim committed suicide due to her relationship out of marriage, is a triable issue and cannot be considered convincing to nullify the allegations of dowry death, at the stage of bail. 9. In the opinion of this Court, the categorical allegations against accused/applicant cannot be ignored. Further, there is a presumption u/s 113-B of Indian Evidence Act against accused/applicant which can also not be lost sight of. Taking note of overall facts and circumstances of this case, no ground to allow the application is made out. Accordingly, bail application is dismissed. 10. Application is disposed of accordingly. 11. Order dasti. 12. In compliance of directions of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case titled ‘In Re: Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail’, Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 04/2021 dated 31.01.2023, copy of this order be sent to applicant through concerned Jail Superintendent for information. (ARVIND BANSAL) Addl. Sessions Judge-05 (Shahdara) Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/09.01.2024 -- 3 of 3 --
