Skip to main content
CS (COMM) - CIVIL SUIT (COMMERCIAL)

Mohit MehendirattaVsMOHD RAFIQ

CNR DLSH010072092024767-District Judge Commercial Court-02
Karkardooma Shahdara, District Sessions Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 28th April 2025

TrustJury record updated 22 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
594/2024
Registration Date
22 Nov 2024

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Mohit Mehendiratta

    Respondent

    1. 1MOHD RAFIQ

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Suits for recovery and Damages · Sec 78

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 25-11-2024
Business: submissions heard  put up for fp
Next Purpose: Case Management Hear/Pre--Trial Conference
Next Hearing Date: 16-12-2024

Date: 16-12-2024
Business: counsel seeks time move application
Next Purpose: Case Management Hear/Pre--Trial Conference
Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2025

Date: 15-01-2025
Business: submissions heard put up for fp
Next Purpose: Case Management Hear/Pre--Trial Conference
Next Hearing Date: 18-02-2025

Date: 18-02-2025
Business: none put up  for fp
Next Purpose: Case Management Hear/Pre--Trial Conference
Next Hearing Date: 20-03-2025

Date: 20-03-2025
Business: put up for appearance of plaintiff
Next Purpose: Case Management Hear/Pre--Trial Conference
Next Hearing Date: 28-04-2025

Date: 28-04-2025
Business: none despite repeated call court fees and cost not paid  hence  case is dismissed in default and for non prosecution.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Disposal Date: 28-04-2025

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 3808/2024
Filing Date: 21-11-2024
eFiling Number: ADL20230002250C202400035
eFiling Date: 21-11-2024
First Hearing Date: 25th November 2024
Decision Date: 28th April 2025
Court Number And Judge: 767-District Judge Commercial Court-02

    Orders

    11
    Final Order 6
    28 Apr 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 5 CS (COMM) 594/24
Mohit Mehendiratta
Vs.
Mohd Rafiq
28.04.2025
Present: None since morning despite repeated call till 1:00 pm.
Plaintiff has not filed court fees till date. Even cost of Rs.3,000/-
was imposed upon the plaintiff on 18.02.2025 to be deposited with DLSA,
Shahdara, which the plaintiff has not deposited nor the receipt of deposit of
cost filed on record till date. It seems that the plaintiff is not interested in
pursuing the present case and thus, the present case is dismissed in default
and for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to record room.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /28.04.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 5
    20 Mar 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 6 CS (COMM) 594/24
Mohit Mehendiratta
Vs.
Mohd Rafiq
20.03.2025
Present: None since morning despite repeated call till 2:11 pm.
On the last date of hearing also, none had appeared on behalf of
plaintiff. Previous cost also not paid by the plaintiff.
In the interest of justice, no adverse order.
Put up for appearance on behalf of plaintiff and for compliance
of previous orders on 28.04.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /20.03.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 4
    18 Feb 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 594/24
Mohit Mehendiratta
Vs.
Mohd Rafiq
18.02.2025
Present: None for the plaintiff despite repeated calls since morning.
Even on the last date of hearing, more time was sought to move
appropriate application. The suit has been instituted on 22.11.2024 and has not
proceeded further due to lapse on the part of the plaintiff. As per the Reader
also, no application has been e-filed as reflected on the portal. Cost of
Rs.3,000/- is imposed upon the plaintiff for today’s adjournment. Cost be
deposited with DLSA, Shahdara and receipt be placed on record.
Put up for further proceedings on 20.03.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 18.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 3
    15 Jan 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) NO. 594/2024
MOHIT MEHENDIRATA
VS.
MOHD. RAFIQ
15.01.2025
Present: Sh. Gaurav, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
More time sought to move appropriate application.
As the case has not proceeded further due to the lapse on the part
of the plaintiff, it is directed that plaintiff shall not be entitled to interest for
intervening period.
Put up for further proceedings on 18.02.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 15.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    16 Dec 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 594/24
Mohit Mehendiratta
Vs.
Mohd Rafiq
16.12.2024
Present: Sh. Yogesh, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
List of documents and list of additional documents under Order XI
Rule 1 CPC along with documents and supporting affidavit of Sh. Mohit
Mehendiratta filed on behalf of plaintiff.
Plaintiff now wishes to file Part B of the E-way bills and Bank
account statement to show receiving of the payment from the defendant within
the jurisdiction of the present court. But, no appplication has been filed by the
plaintiff for taking on record the additional documents (running into 13 pages) as
per the additional list of documents.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff seeks time to move appropriate application
under Order XI Rule 1 (5) Commercial Courts Act.
Let the same be done.
Put up for further proceedings on 15.01.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 16.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    25 Nov 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 2 CS (COMM) 594/24
Mohit Mehendiratta
Vs.
Mohd Rafiq
25.11.2024
Fresh suit received on assignment basis. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Durgesh Pal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
Court fees not filed by the plaintiff. Certificate under Section 63
of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 in support of digital evidence also not
filed. List of documents also not filed as per the Commercial Courts Act. No
bank account statement has been filed by the plaintiff showing receiving of
payment from the defendant with the jurisdiction of the present Court.
Counsel seeks time to do the needful.
At request, put up for further proceeding on 16.12.2024.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 25.11.2024.
Digital signature not appended as the same have expired and renewal of the same has been
applied.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 5
    20 Mar 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 6 CS (COMM) 594/24
Mohit Mehendiratta
Vs.
Mohd Rafiq
20.03.2025
Present: None since morning despite repeated call till 2:11 pm.
On the last date of hearing also, none had appeared on behalf of
plaintiff. Previous cost also not paid by the plaintiff.
In the interest of justice, no adverse order.
Put up for appearance on behalf of plaintiff and for compliance
of previous orders on 28.04.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi /20.03.2025.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 4
    18 Feb 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 594/24
Mohit Mehendiratta
Vs.
Mohd Rafiq
18.02.2025
Present: None for the plaintiff despite repeated calls since morning.
Even on the last date of hearing, more time was sought to move
appropriate application. The suit has been instituted on 22.11.2024 and has not
proceeded further due to lapse on the part of the plaintiff. As per the Reader
also, no application has been e-filed as reflected on the portal. Cost of
Rs.3,000/- is imposed upon the plaintiff for today’s adjournment. Cost be
deposited with DLSA, Shahdara and receipt be placed on record.
Put up for further proceedings on 20.03.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 18.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3
    15 Jan 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM.) NO. 594/2024
MOHIT MEHENDIRATA
VS.
MOHD. RAFIQ
15.01.2025
Present: Sh. Gaurav, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
More time sought to move appropriate application.
As the case has not proceeded further due to the lapse on the part
of the plaintiff, it is directed that plaintiff shall not be entitled to interest for
intervening period.
Put up for further proceedings on 18.02.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 15.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    16 Dec 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 594/24
Mohit Mehendiratta
Vs.
Mohd Rafiq
16.12.2024
Present: Sh. Yogesh, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
List of documents and list of additional documents under Order XI
Rule 1 CPC along with documents and supporting affidavit of Sh. Mohit
Mehendiratta filed on behalf of plaintiff.
Plaintiff now wishes to file Part B of the E-way bills and Bank
account statement to show receiving of the payment from the defendant within
the jurisdiction of the present court. But, no appplication has been filed by the
plaintiff for taking on record the additional documents (running into 13 pages) as
per the additional list of documents.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff seeks time to move appropriate application
under Order XI Rule 1 (5) Commercial Courts Act.
Let the same be done.
Put up for further proceedings on 15.01.2025.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 16.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    25 Nov 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 2 CS (COMM) 594/24
Mohit Mehendiratta
Vs.
Mohd Rafiq
25.11.2024
Fresh suit received on assignment basis. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Durgesh Pal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
Court fees not filed by the plaintiff. Certificate under Section 63
of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 in support of digital evidence also not
filed. List of documents also not filed as per the Commercial Courts Act. No
bank account statement has been filed by the plaintiff showing receiving of
payment from the defendant with the jurisdiction of the present Court.
Counsel seeks time to do the needful.
At request, put up for further proceeding on 16.12.2024.
(Kiran Bansal)
District Judge, Commercial Court-02,
Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi / 25.11.2024.
Digital signature not appended as the same have expired and renewal of the same has been
applied.
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.