Order 16

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1 CS (COMM) 554/24
Gaurav Gupta Vs. Khetrapal Kiran, proprietor of M/s Dynamic Print
Grafix
19.03.2026
Present: Sh. Naman Gari, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
The matter is fixed for service of the summons to the
defendant by way of publication thereof in the newspapers “The Times of
India” and “Amar Ujala” having wide circulation in the area of Delhi and
in Greater Noida (Uttar Pradesh). The newspapers are not received in this
court. But, today, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has filed newspapers “The
Times of India” and “Amar Ujala” both edition dated 31.01.2026 along
with his affidavit regarding service of summons to the defendant by way
of publication thereof in the abovesaid newspapers. Filing affidavit and
newspapers on the e-portal has been verified by the Assistant Ahlmad
posted in this court. But, today despite of repeated calls, no one has
appeared on behalf of the defendant. Since sufficient time has already
been passed from the date of publication of summons in the abovesaid
newspapers. But, despite of service of the summons in the newspapers,
the defendant has failed to appear in the court, so, the matter stands
passed over till 01:00 PM for awaiting the defendant.
(PAWAN KUMAR MATTO)
DISTRICT JUDGE
(COMMERCIAL COURT)-04,
SHAHDARA, KKD,
Delhi/19.03.2026
-- 1 of 2 --
At 1:00 PM.
Present: Sh. Naman Gari, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
The matter was passed over for 01:00 PM for awaiting the
defendant. But, even at 01:00 PM, no one has appeared on behalf of the
defendant. So, the matter was passed over till 2:30 PM for awaiting the
defendant.
(PAWAN KUMAR MATTO)
DISTRICT JUDGE
(COMMERCIAL COURT)-04,
SHAHDARA, KKD,
Delhi/19.03.2026
At 2:30 PM.
Present: Sh. Naman Gari, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
The matter is fixed for service of the summons to the
defendant by way of publication thereof in the newspapers “The Times of
India” and “Amar Ujala” having wide circulation in the area of Delhi and in
Greater Noida (Uttar Pradesh). The Defendant has been served by way of
publication thereof summons in the newspapers “The Times of India” and
“Amar Ujala” both edition dated 31.01.2026 and sufficient time has already
been passed from the date of publication of summons in the abovesaid
newspapers. But, today, despite of repeated calls since morning till 02:30
PM, no one has appeared on behalf of the defendant, so, the defendant is
proceeded exparte. The matter stands adjourned for exparte evidence of the
plaintiff. To come up on 21.04.2026.
(PAWAN KUMAR MATTO)
DISTRICT JUDGE
(COMMERCIAL COURT)-04,
SHAHDARA, KKD,
Delhi/19.03.2026
-- 2 of 2 --