Skip to main content
RC ARC - RENT CONTROLLER/ADDL. R.C.

SANJEEV JAINVsNitesh Jain

CNR DLSH010067332023771-District Judge
Karkardooma Shahdara, District Sessions Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 01st October 2024

TrustJury record updated 22 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
780/2023
Registration Date
31 Oct 2023

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1SANJEEV JAIN

    Respondent

    1. 1Nitesh Jain

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Civil Procedure Code 1908 · Sec ORDER 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 01-11-2023
Business: Misc
Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments
Next Hearing Date: 22-11-2023

Date: 22-11-2023
Business: MISC.
Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments
Next Hearing Date: 03-01-2024

Date: 03-01-2024
Business: FP
Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments
Next Hearing Date: 27-02-2024

Date: 27-02-2024
Business: FP
Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments
Next Hearing Date: 25-05-2024

Date: 25-05-2024
Business: 25.04.2024 is declared holiday.
Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments
Next Hearing Date: 27-05-2024

Date: 27-05-2024
Business: FP
Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments
Next Hearing Date: 23-07-2024

Date: 23-07-2024
Business: Further proceedings.
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2024

Date: 01-10-2024
Business: Application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC is disposed off as allowed.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 01-10-2024

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 3407/2023
Filing Date: 26-10-2023
First Hearing Date: 01st November 2023
Decision Date: 01st October 2024
Court Number And Judge: 771-District Judge

    Orders

    11
    Final Order 6Full order available
    01 Oct 2024

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 11 MISC DJ 780/23 SANJEEV JAIN VS. NITESH JAIN 01.10.2024 Present: Sh. M. K. Singh and Sh. Sandeep Kumar, ld. Counsel for applicant with applicant. Sh. Deepak Yadav, ld. Counsel for respondent with respondent. Counsel for applicant / defendant points out the order sheets dated 01.02.2022 and 07.05.2022 from the main file and submits that father of defendant / Sh. Satish Jain had appeared. The applicant submits that his father never appeared in…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 5
    23 Jul 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 30 MISC DJ 780/23
SANJEEV JAIN Vs. NITESH JAIN
23.07.2024
Present: Sh. Pankaj Singhal (through VC) and Sh. Sandeep Kumar, ld.
Counsels for applicant.
Sh. Deepak Yadav and Sh. Navin Kumar Singhal, ld. Counsels for
respondent.
Counsel for applicant / Nitesh Jain has filed photocopy of sale
deed dated 04.03.2020 alongwith list of documents. Taken on record.
Applicant / Nitesh Jain is directed to appear in person on the
NDOH.
Put up for further proceedings on 01.10.2024.
(Mohammad Ehtesham)
DJ – 03, Shahdara District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
23.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 4
    27 Feb 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 28 MISC DJ 780/23
SANJEEV JAIN Vs. NITESH JAIN
27.02.2024
(Regular second PA is on long leave and no
substitute has been provided in her place.)
Present: Sh. Anuptam Jindal, Ld. counsel for Applicant
(through VC).
Sh. Deepak Yadav, Ld. counsel for Respondent.
Matter is listed today for arguments on application
under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.
Part arguments heard on said application.
Ld. Counsel for applicant submits that the address
on which the applicant/Defendant was served was sold by
Defendant in the year 2020 and therefore, there is no question of
defendant having been served on the said address. Ld. Counsel
seeks some time to file documentary proof regarding such
submissions.
Put up for further arguments on said application on
25.05.2024.
(Mohammad Ehtesham)
ADJ03(Shahdara),
KKD Courts, Delhi
27.02.2024.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 3
    03 Jan 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 22 MISC DJ No. 780/23
SANJEEV JAIN Vs. NITESH JAIN
03.01.2024
Present: Sh. M. K. Singh, proxy counsel for applicant.
Sh. Deepak Yadav, Ld. counsel for Respondent.
Matter is listed today for arguments on Applicant’s
application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. However, adjournment
sought by proxy counsel for applicant for arguments stating that
main counsel is not available today as he is having fever for the
last two days.
Adjournment is opposed by ld. counsel for
respondent by stating that factum of taking adjournment should
have been informed to him in advance.
Applicant is burdened with costs of Rs.500/-, which
shall be paid by him to the other side.
Put up for purpose fixed for 27.02.2024 at 12.30
PM.
It is made clear to Applicant that no further
adjournment shall be granted to him and in case of non-
availability of his Advocate, it is for him to make an alternate
arrangement accordingly.
(Mohammad Ehtesham)
ADJ-03(Shahdara),
KKD Courts, Delhi
03.01.2024.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    22 Nov 2023
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: MISC DJ 780/23
SANJEEV JAIN Vs. NITESH JAIN
22.11.2023
Present: Sh. Deepak Yadav, ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Anupam Jindal, ld. Counsel for respondent.
Main suit file received and tagged with the present
petition.
Counsel for petitioner has filed reply to the
application u/o 9 rule 13 r/w section 151 CPC. Copy supplied.
Put up for arguments on the application u/o 9 rule 13
r/w section 151 CPC on 03.01.2024.
(Mohammad Ehtesham)
ADJ03, Shahdara
KKD Courts, Delhi
22.11.2023
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    01 Nov 2023
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11 MISC DJ 780/23
SANJEEV JAIN Vs. NITESH JAIN
01.11.2023
Application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC filed by
applicant/Defendant.
Present: Sh. Pankaj Singhal, Ld. Counsel for Applicant.
Sh. Deepak Yadav, Ld. Counsel for Respondent/DH
appeared in connected Ex. No. 181/2023 and accepts notice of
this application.
Copy of application be supplied to
respondent/counsel within a week, who shall file reply to the said
application within two weeks with advance copy to other side.
Put up for reply and arguments on said application
on 22.11.2023.
Main file be requisitioned from the record room.
(Mohammad Ehtesham)
ADJ03, Shahdara
KKD Courts, Delhi
01.11.2023.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 5
    23 Jul 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 30 MISC DJ 780/23
SANJEEV JAIN Vs. NITESH JAIN
23.07.2024
Present: Sh. Pankaj Singhal (through VC) and Sh. Sandeep Kumar, ld.
Counsels for applicant.
Sh. Deepak Yadav and Sh. Navin Kumar Singhal, ld. Counsels for
respondent.
Counsel for applicant / Nitesh Jain has filed photocopy of sale
deed dated 04.03.2020 alongwith list of documents. Taken on record.
Applicant / Nitesh Jain is directed to appear in person on the
NDOH.
Put up for further proceedings on 01.10.2024.
(Mohammad Ehtesham)
DJ – 03, Shahdara District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
23.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 4
    27 Feb 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 28 MISC DJ 780/23
SANJEEV JAIN Vs. NITESH JAIN
27.02.2024
(Regular second PA is on long leave and no
substitute has been provided in her place.)
Present: Sh. Anuptam Jindal, Ld. counsel for Applicant
(through VC).
Sh. Deepak Yadav, Ld. counsel for Respondent.
Matter is listed today for arguments on application
under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.
Part arguments heard on said application.
Ld. Counsel for applicant submits that the address
on which the applicant/Defendant was served was sold by
Defendant in the year 2020 and therefore, there is no question of
defendant having been served on the said address. Ld. Counsel
seeks some time to file documentary proof regarding such
submissions.
Put up for further arguments on said application on
25.05.2024.
(Mohammad Ehtesham)
ADJ03(Shahdara),
KKD Courts, Delhi
27.02.2024.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3
    03 Jan 2024
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 22 MISC DJ No. 780/23
SANJEEV JAIN Vs. NITESH JAIN
03.01.2024
Present: Sh. M. K. Singh, proxy counsel for applicant.
Sh. Deepak Yadav, Ld. counsel for Respondent.
Matter is listed today for arguments on Applicant’s
application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. However, adjournment
sought by proxy counsel for applicant for arguments stating that
main counsel is not available today as he is having fever for the
last two days.
Adjournment is opposed by ld. counsel for
respondent by stating that factum of taking adjournment should
have been informed to him in advance.
Applicant is burdened with costs of Rs.500/-, which
shall be paid by him to the other side.
Put up for purpose fixed for 27.02.2024 at 12.30
PM.
It is made clear to Applicant that no further
adjournment shall be granted to him and in case of non-
availability of his Advocate, it is for him to make an alternate
arrangement accordingly.
(Mohammad Ehtesham)
ADJ-03(Shahdara),
KKD Courts, Delhi
03.01.2024.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    22 Nov 2023
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: MISC DJ 780/23
SANJEEV JAIN Vs. NITESH JAIN
22.11.2023
Present: Sh. Deepak Yadav, ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Sh. Anupam Jindal, ld. Counsel for respondent.
Main suit file received and tagged with the present
petition.
Counsel for petitioner has filed reply to the
application u/o 9 rule 13 r/w section 151 CPC. Copy supplied.
Put up for arguments on the application u/o 9 rule 13
r/w section 151 CPC on 03.01.2024.
(Mohammad Ehtesham)
ADJ03, Shahdara
KKD Courts, Delhi
22.11.2023
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    01 Nov 2023
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11 MISC DJ 780/23
SANJEEV JAIN Vs. NITESH JAIN
01.11.2023
Application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC filed by
applicant/Defendant.
Present: Sh. Pankaj Singhal, Ld. Counsel for Applicant.
Sh. Deepak Yadav, Ld. Counsel for Respondent/DH
appeared in connected Ex. No. 181/2023 and accepts notice of
this application.
Copy of application be supplied to
respondent/counsel within a week, who shall file reply to the said
application within two weeks with advance copy to other side.
Put up for reply and arguments on said application
on 22.11.2023.
Main file be requisitioned from the record room.
(Mohammad Ehtesham)
ADJ03, Shahdara
KKD Courts, Delhi
01.11.2023.
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.