Bail Matters

STATEVsDILIP

CNR DLSH010066152024777-Additional Sessions Judge

Karkardooma Shahdara, District Sessions Court

delhi · Delhi (DL)

CASE DISPOSED

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Decision Date: 06th November 2024

TrustJury record updated 22 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number: 1931/2024
Registration Date: 21 Oct 2024

Advocates

No advocate information is available in this record.

Parties

Petitioner

1STATE

Respondent

1DILIP

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita · Sec 103(1) · 109(1) · 3(5)

Police / FIR Details

Police Station: Harash Vihar
FIR Number / Year: 551/2024

Case Timeline

Newest first2 dates/groups

Case disposedCompletion recorded

06 Nov 2024

2 records

Court Proceeding

CONSIDERING THE OVERALL CIRCMSTNCES, IT IS ORDERED THAT IN CASE THE APPLICANT/ACCUSED ARE SOUGHT TO BE ARRESTED IN THE PRESENT CASE, FIVE (WORKING ) DAYS…

Read full proceeding

Business: CONSIDERING THE OVERALL CIRCMSTNCES, IT IS ORDERED THAT IN CASE THE APPLICANT/ACCUSED ARE SOUGHT TO BE ARRESTED IN THE PRESENT CASE, FIVE (WORKING ) DAYS NOTICE BE GIVEN TO THE APPLICANT/ACCUSED PRIOR TO THEIR ASSEST. APPLICATION DISPOSED OF ACCORDINGLY.
Nature Of Disposal: DISPOSED
Disposal Date: 06-11-2024

Final Order 2

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: Bail Applications No.1930/24 & 1931/24 State Vs. Avnish Kumar @ Vishal & Dilip. FIR No. 551/24 U/s 103(1), 109(1), 345(1), 3(5) BNS. PS – Harsh Vihar. 06.11.2024 Present: Sh.Rakesh…

View order details ↓

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Bail Applications No.1930/24 & 1931/24
State Vs. Avnish Kumar @ Vishal & Dilip.
FIR No. 551/24
U/s 103(1), 109(1), 345(1), 3(5) BNS.
PS – Harsh Vihar.
06.11.2024
Present: Sh.Rakesh Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Sh. K.D. Soni, Ld. Counsel for the applicants.
IO/Inspector Rajeev Kumar.
Vide this common order, two applications u/s 482 Cr. P.C for
grant of anticipatory bail shall be disposed of arising out of same FIR.
Heard on the applications.
During the course of arguments, it is submitted by the IO that
the custodial interrogation of the applicants/accused is not required as of
now.
Considering the overall circumstances, it is ordered that in
case if the applicants/accused are sought to be arrested in the present case,
five (working) days notice be given to the applicants/accused prior to their
arrest. With these observations, both the applications stand disposed of
accordingly. Copy of the order be given dasti, if required.
(Raghubir Singh)
Addl. Sessions Judge (FTC),
Shahdara District,
Karkardooma Courts
Delhi/06.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

22 Oct 2024

3 records

Court Proceeding

BAIL

Next purpose: For Bail

Read full proceeding

Business: BAIL
Next Purpose: For Bail

Interim Order 1

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: Bail Application No.1930/2024 State vs. Avnish Kumar @ Vishal Bail Application No.1931/2024 State vs. Dilip FIR No.551/2024 U/s 103(1)/109(1)/345(3)/3(5) BNS & Sec.25 Arms Act…

Read Full Order →

Order 1