Order 4

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CA 213/2024
RAMESH CHAND Vs. SANDEEP AGGARWAL
PS G.T.B. Enclave
05.03.2025 (through hybrid mode)
Present: Sh. Nitin Prabhakhar, Ld. Counsel for appellant.
Appellant through VC.
None for respondent.
FDR in the sum of Rs.12 lacs not deposited by the appellant
despite directions dt. 20.09.2024. On the last date of hearing i.e. 17.02.2025,
Ld. Counsel for appellant had submitted that a revision petition has been
preferred before Hon’ble High Court of Delhi vide diary no. 79090 dt.
30.01.2025 against order dt. 20.09.2024 of this Court. However, said mater has
yet not been listed. Further, there is no stay on the order dt. 20.09.2024 of this
Court from any Hon’ble Higher Court.
It was clarified in the order dt. 20.09.0024 that in case, appellant
fails to comply with the direction of deposit of FDR, the stay shall stand
vacated. It is noted that appellant was statutorily required to deposit the FDR
within sixty days of the order, however, he has failed to deposit the same
despite passage of more than 150 days since the date of order. No further time
can be granted.
Court is constrained to vacate the stay on execution of sentence
granted vide order dt. 20.09.2024. Further, appellant has failed to appear in
persons despite specific directions on the last date of hearing. No medical
document of appellant has been filed. Accordingly, Court deems it appropriate
and constrained to issue Non Bailable Warrants against the appellant and
notice to his surety returnable on 08.04.2025. Also put up for reply/arguments
on date fixed.
(ARVIND BANSAL)
ASJ-05, Shahdara, Karkardooma,
Delhi-05.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --