Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 28 Aug 2024 · CNR DLSH010053322024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF SH. SAMEER BAJPAI ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-03 (SHAHDARA), KARKARDOOMA COURT, DELHI Bail Application No. : 1580/24 State vs. Nitin Rana FIR No. : 329/24 PS : Harsh Vihar U/s : 18 NDPS Act 28.08.2024 Present : Ms. Neelam Narang Addl. PP for the State alongwith I.O. SI Nitin Kumar. Sh. Ravi Drall and Ms. Aditi Singh counsel for the applicant/accused. This is an application moved u/s 483 BNSS on behalf of applicant/accused Nitin Rana seeking regular bail. It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that the present case was registered on the complaint of complainant who alleged that while checking the jail premises, the applicant/accused was found in possession of substance like opium 100 gms. It is further submitted that firstly, the applicant’s bag and his body was fully checked by the ITBP and nothing was found in his possession. Further, he was again checked at CPRO gate and he was found in possession of 100 gms. Contraband opium at about 9.15 p.m. Further, the allegations of the manner of recovery as mentioned in the FIR are concocted. Further, in order to prove his innocence, the applicant/accused got preserved the CCTV footage of the security gate which will show that no recovery of alleged substance was made in the manner in which it has been shown in the FIR. Further, no complaint was given in the police station about the recovery of drugs on the same day of alleged recovery and the FIR was lodged on 25.07.2024 i.e. after six days of alleged recovery. Further, the applicant/accused is ready to join the investigation and undertakes to extend his full co-operation to the investigation agencies. -- 1 of 2 -- Reply filed by the I.O. Copy supplied. It is submitted that on 20.07.2024 a General Diary no. 06A was received at P.S. Harsh Vihar from the Mandoli Jail Complex, Delhi that some suspicious substance was recovered from the possession of Jail Warder Nitin Kumar Rana while searching by the CRPF officials at CPRO hall. Further, the I.O. reached the spot and the CRPF staff handed over him one white envelope which was suspected to have 100 gms. Opium (2 bars). Further, on getting a complaint from CRPF staff, the present case was registered and on 27.07.2024 the applicant/accused was arrested. Ld. Addl. PP has opposed the bail application on the grounds that the offence committed by the accused is heinous in nature. Further, the recovered contraband is intermediate in quantity. Further, the investigation is at initial stage and the source of contraband is not traceable. Further, if the accused is enlarged on bail, he may affect the investigation. The court has heard the arguments and perused the material available on record. The record shows that the accused has been in custody for last about one month and the investigation qua him is complete. Further, the applicant is a Govt. servant and the court sees no chance that he will abscond or will not cooperate in remaining investigation. Considering the over all facts and circumstances, the application is allowed, the applicant/accused is admitted to bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount. Nothing stated herein shall tantamount to an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. Order dasti. ( Sameer Bajpai ) Addl. Sessions Judge-03 Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi : 28.08.2024 -- 2 of 2 --
