Order 11

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: -1-
11 CS (COMM) 438/24
Suresh Lata Vs. Laxmi traders
10.10.2025
Present : Sh. Ashok Kumar Jain, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Nishant Chaudhary and Sh. Rakshit Singh, Ld. Counsels for the
defendant.
The matter is fixed for payment of the cost of Rs.5000/- by the defendant to
the plaintiff and also for cross examination of PW-1. Today the counsel for the defendant
has told to the court that in view of some personal exigency, the defendant could not
come and he has assured that defendant will pay the cost to the plainitff on the next date
of hearing and submitted that he may be allowed to cross examine of PW-1. So, taking
into consideration the submission made by the counsel for the defendant, the defendant
is allowed to pay the cost of Rs.5000/- to the plaintiff on the next date of hearing. The
counsel for the defendant is allowed to cross examine PW-1.
At this stage, Sh. Nishant Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel for the defendant,
started cross examination of PW-1 and during cross examination of PW-1, Sh. Nishant
Chaudhary, advocate started wasting the time of the court as during cross examination
of PW-1 he is making gossip with Sh. Rakshit, Advocate before putting the question to
the PW-1 and he is taking big pause. He is requested not to waste the time of the court
in making gossip Sh. Rakshit, Advocate. The counsel for the defendant is requested to
expedite the cross examination of PW-1.
At this stage, Sh. Nishant Chaudhary has submitted that he was consulting
with Rakshit, Advocate for cross examination of PW-1.
Accordingly, PW-1 has been cross examined by the counsel for the
defendant. His cross examination has been concluded. Thereafter, the attorney of the
plaintiff has given the statement that the plaintiff does not want to examine any other
witness and prayed for closing the evidence of the plaintiff. Separate statement of
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
attorney of the plaintiff has been recorded to this efffect. In view of the statement of the
attorney of the plaintiff, the evidence of the plaintiff stands closed.
Accordingly, matter is ordered to be listed for evidence of the defendant.
The defendant is directed to file affidavits of all the witnesses in the court at least one
week prior to the next date of hearing and to supply advance copy thereof to the plaintiff
or her counsel in similar fashion. To come up on 12.01.2026.
(PAWAN KUMAR MATTO)
DISTRICT JUDGE
(COMMERCIAL COURT)-04,
SHAHDARA, KKD,
Delhi/10.10.2025
-- 2 of 2 --