Full Order Text
Interim Order 15 · 25 Aug 2026 · CNR DLSH010046392024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: -1- 8 CS (COMM) 405/24 Surender Singh Vs. Pushpa Giri 25.08.2026 Present: Sh. Kartik Sharma, Ld. proxy counsel for plaintiff. Ms. Aayushi Singh, Legal Aid Counsel for the defendant alongwith the defendant. Witness Sh. Mehfooz Alam, Technical Assistant, Department of Forensic Medicine, UCMS, GTB, Hospital, Delhi. Witness Sh. Atishay Jain, Inspector, CGST, From Sector 32, Gurgoan alongwith Advocate, Iqbal Singh Bedi. Witness HC Naveen Kumar, From Police Station Seemapuri, Delhi. Orderly Sh. Jai Kumar, from the Bank of India, Branch- Connaught Circus, New Delhi, (The Record Clerk from Bank of India, Branch- Connaught Circus, absented, despite service). The matter is fixed for evidence of the defendant. Today, the defendant has appeared alongwith Legal Aid Counsel, she has filed the affidavit of Sh. Suneet Kumar and submitted that Sh. Suneet Kumar is the husband of the defendant and he had personally served the notices to all the four witnesses. Today, Orderly, Jai Kumar has appeared from Bank of India, Connaught Circus, New Delhi, but, the Record Keeper/ Record Clerk has not appeared despite of service of notice to him. Jai Kumar has told that he was sent by the Manager of the Bank of India. Ld. Counsel for the defendant has submitted that since the summoned witness has not appeared, despite of service of notice, so, bailable warrants may be issued against the witness. So, bailable warrants in a sum of Rs. 5,000/- are ordered to be issued against witness concerned, Record Keeper/Record Clerk/Assistant, from Bank of India, Connaught Circus, New Delhi. Sh. Iqbal Singh Bedi, Advocate has appeared alongwith the witness Sh. Atishay Jain and he has filed the memo of appearance on behalf of this Witness Sh. Atishay Jain, Inspector, CGST, From -- 1 of 3 -- -2- Sector 32, Gurgoan, but, Sh. Atishay Jain did not bring the certificate u/s 63 of BSA and Ld. Counsel for the defendant has submitted that today this witness may be discharged unexamined. So that, he may bring the certificate under section 63 of BSA alongwith the summoned record, so, this witness Sh. Atishay Jain, CGST Inspector is discharged unexamined for today and he is bound down for the next date of hearing i.e. 01.12.2026. He is also directed to bring the complete summoned record and certificate u/s 63 of BSA. Sh. Mehfooz Alam, witness from the GTB Hospital has also appeared alongwith the summoned record. So, let this witness be examined. Accordingly, Sh. Mehfooz Alam has been examined as DW-1. When the examination in chief of this witness was being recorded, the Ld. proxy counsel for plaintiff left the court without informing to the court and thereafter, despite of repeated calls, he did not appear. Ld. legal Aid counsel for the defendant has submitted that Ld. proxy counsel for plaintiff has deliberately left the court. It also appears to the court that the Ld. proxy counsel for plaintiff has deliberately left the court and plaintiff also did not appear today in the court. Therefore, the opportunity of the plaintiff to cross-examine this witness is done nil. Witness Sh. Mehfooz Alam is paid died money to the tune of Rs. 500/- by the defendant, he is discharged. Sh. Naveen Kumar, HC witness is also present in the court. Let this witness be examined. Accordingly, examination in chief of this summoned witness is also recorded. But, the Ld. proxy counsel for plaintiff, who had left the court when the examination in chief of another witness was being recorded without informing to the court and thereafter, he did not appear, despite of repeated calls. Ld. legal Aid counsel for the defendant has submitted that Ld. proxy counsel for plaintiff has deliberately left the court. It also appears to -- 2 of 3 -- -3- the court that the Ld. proxy counsel for plaintiff has deliberately left the court and plaintiff also did not appear today in the court. Since, the plaintiff is also not appeared today in the court. Therefore, the opportunity of the plaintiff to cross-examine this witness is also done nil. The defendant is directed to take steps for issuance of bailable warrants against the witness within seven working days from today. To come up on 01.12.2026 for remaining evidence of the defendant. (PAWAN KUMAR MATTO) DISTRICT JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT)-04, SHAHDARA, KKD, Delhi/25.08.2026 -- 3 of 3 --
