Order 2

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 8 CS 465/24
SANJAY VERMA VS. MEENU SHARMA
07.11.2024
Present: Sh. Nishant Kumar Tyagi, ld. Counsel for plaintiff with son of
plaintiff no. 2.
Sh. Satish Verma and Sh. Vikas Chauhan, ld. Counsel for
defendant no. 1.
As per the ahlmad report, defendant no. 3 was served on
26.09.2024.
WS on behalf of defendant no. 1 alongwith reply to application
u/o 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC filed. Copy supplied.
Counsel for the plaintiff submits that WS has not been filed within
stipulated period. Counsel for defendant ensures to file condonation of delay
application with advance copy to the other side.
Counsel for defendant no. 1 submits that defendants no. 2 and 3
have contacted him today only. He has filed memo of appearance on behalf of
defendant no. 2 and 3. Ld. Counsel seeks an opportunity to file condonation of
delay application alongwith WS on behalf of defendant no. 2 and 3. Let the
same be filed within stipulated time with advance copy to the other side.
Reply to the condonation of delay application be filed by the
plaintiff within 04 weeks after receiving copy of application.
Counter claim has also been filed by the defendant. Copy
supplied.
-- 1 of 2 --
Ahlmad is directed to register the counter claim separately. Let
reply to the same be filed by the plaintiff within 04 weeks with advance copy
to the other side. Thereafter, rejoinder to the reply be filed within 04 weeks
with advance copy to the other side.
Put up for arguments on the above applications and further
proceedings on 17.02.2025.
(Mohammad Ehtesham)
DJ – 03, Shahdara District,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi
07.11.2024
-- 2 of 2 --