Interim Order 4

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Bail Matters 1338/2025
STATE VS. AYAZ AHMAD ALIAS JAVED
FIR No. 383/2023
PS: Anand Vihar
06.10.2025
This is an application under Section 483 of BNSS
seeking regular bail moved on behalf of applicant/accused Ayaz
Ahmad.
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 1 of 51 --
(In-camera Proceedings)
Bail Matters 1345/2025
STATE VS. Shri Balram
FIR No. 386/2025
PS: Anand Vihar
06.10.2025
This is an application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023
seeking bail moved on behalf of applicant/accused Shri Balram.
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 2 of 51 --
Bail Matters 1379/2025
STATE VS. Ajay Kumar Sharma
FIR No. 427/2025
PS: Anand Vihar
U/s 69 BNS
06.10.2025
This is an application under Section 483 BNSS seeking
interim bail moved on behalf of applicant/accused Ajay Kumar
Sharma.
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Sh. S.P. Sharma, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused.
1. Medical Status report from the concerned Jail
Superintendent received, copy of the same is supplied to Ld. Counsel
for applicant/accused.
2. At this stage, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused seeks
time to address arguments on the present application.
3. Submissions heard. Record perused. Adjournment sought
is granted.
4. Put up for arguments on the present application on
08.10.2025.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 3 of 51 --
SC No. 200/2019
State Vs. Gaurav
FIR No. 139/2017
PS: Seema Puri
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 4 of 51 --
Cr. Rev. No. 195/2025
Gyatri Devi Vs. State & Ors.
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 5 of 51 --
SC No. 141/2024
State Vs. Faizan
FIR No. 34/2024
PS: Welcome
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 6 of 51 --
SC No. 250/2017
STATE VS. Jitender Pal Narang & Anr.
FIR No. 137/2010
PS: Anand Vihar
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 7 of 51 --
SC No. 170/2022
STATE VS. Manish Kumar & Anr.
FIR No.170/2022
PS: Anand Vihar
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Both the accused persons are produced from JC.
Sh. Arpit Jain and Ms. Eshika Sharma, Ld. Counsel for
both the accused persons.
PW W/ASI Sudha in person.
1. PW W/ASI Sudha has been examined as PW-6, duly
cross-examined by Ld. Defence Counsel and discharged.
2. No other PW is present today. PW/Ct. Praveen is absent
despite service.
3. Ld. Counsel for accused persons has submitted that FSL
in the present case has not been filed till date.
4. Submissions heard. Record perused. Issue notice to the
SHO concerned for filing the FSL result in the present case and if the
said report/result is not ready, he is directed to take appropriate steps
for getting it expedited.
5. Put up for PE on 05.12.2025. PWs. Ct. Praveen and Ct.
Rohitash be summoned for the next date of hearing.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 8 of 51 --
SC No. 193/2023
State Vs. Deepak & Anr.
FIR No. 62/2023
PS: GTB Enclave
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Accused Deepak is present on bail.
Accused Rahul @ Chatpati is absent.
Sh. Omvir Singh Sisodiya and Sh. Ashutosh Mahajan,
Ld. Counsels for accused Deepak.
Ms. Payal Gupta, Ld. Amicus Curiae for accused Rahul
@ Chatpati.
PW ASI Rakesh Kumar in person.
1. Death verification report of the accused Rahul @
Chatpati is received on record. It is reported that accused Rahul @
Chatpati has died on 03.09.2025 in LNJP Hospital. Copy of the Death
Certificate is attached with the report.
2. Ld. Addl. PP for the State has submitted that since, the
death of the accused Rahul @ Chatpati has already been verified,
therefore, proceeding against him may be abated.
3. Submissions heard. Record perused. In view of the Death
Verification Report of accused Rahul @ Chatpati, proceedings against
him is abated. Ms. Payal Gupta is also discharged as Ld. Amicus
Curiae for the accused Rahul @ Chatpati.
4. At this stage, Ld Addl. PP for the State has submitted that
PW/ASI Rakesh Kumar may be discharged unexamined today since,
he is one of the IO of the present case and arrest and recovery witness
PW/HC Amit may be examined before him.
-- 9 of 51 --
5. Submissions heard. Record perused. PW/ ASI Rakesh
Kumar is discharged unexamined today at the request of Ld. Addl. PP
for the State.
6. Put up for PE on 08.12.2025. PWs HC Amit and ASI
Rakesh Kumar be summoned for the next date of hearing.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 10 of 51 --
SC No. 237/2024
STATE VS. Faizan @ Faizi @ Maya & Ors.
FIR No. 137/2024
PS: Welcome
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 11 of 51 --
CA No. 77/2024
Chanderbhan Vs. Soni Devi
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. Amit Riyar and Sh. Pankaj Riyar, Ld. Counsel for
appellant.
Respondent in person.
1. Both the parties have submitted that subject property is of
four floors consisting of ground floor to third floor.
2. Ld. Counsel for appellant has submitted that subject
property i.e. top floor of the property is third floor, however,
respondent has submitted that she calls top floor of the property as
fourth floor of the house.
3. At this stage, Ld. Counsel for appellant seeks
adjournment to address further clarification on the aforesaid aspect
and respondent also seeks adjournment while submitting that her
Counsel is not available today due to some personal exigency.
4. Submissions heard. Record perused. Adjournment sought
is granted.
5. Put up for further arguments on the present Appeal on
13.01.2026. Date is given as per the request and convenience of both
the parties.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 12 of 51 --
Cr. Rev. No. 235/2024
Pawan Vs. State
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. Pradeep Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for revisionist.
Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State/respondent.
1. Arguments on the present Revision Petition further heard.
2. Put up for remaining arguments on 03.12.2025.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 13 of 51 --
Cr. Rev. No. 151/2025
M/s. Sagron Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Vikash Yadav & Ors.
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. Pravesh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for Revisionist.
Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State/respondent
no. 1.
1. Ld. Counsel for Revisionist has submitted that Ld. Trial
Court has already issued summons to the proposed accused persons
and now the complainant/revisionist want to pursue his matter as a
complaint case, therefore, the present Revision Petition may be
disposed of as withdrawn.
2. Submissions heard. Record perused. Separate statement
of Ld. Counsel for Revisioniost is recorded in this regard and in view
of the same, the present Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Revision File be consigned to record room. TCR along
with copy of this order be sent to Ld. Trial Court. Copy of this order
be given dasti to Ld. Counsel for revisionist.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 14 of 51 --
Cr. Rev. No. 151/2025
M/s. Sagron Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Vikash Yadav & Ors.
06.10.2025
Statement of Sh. Pravesh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for Revisionist,
Enrollment No. D-3192/2014.
AT BAR
I am Counsel for Revisionist. The Ld. Trial Court has
already issued summons to the proposed accused persons and now as
per the instructions received from the complainant/revisionist, he
wants to pursue this matter as a complaint case only, therefore, he
wants to withdraw the present Revision Petition. Accordingly, as per
the instructions of the complainant/revisionist, I am withdrawing this
Revision Petition.
RO&AC
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 15 of 51 --
CA No. 120/2024
Shilu Bawalia Vs. Victor Vicky
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. Arvind Kumar, Ld. Counsel for appellant.
Sh. Durgesh Pal, Ld. Counsel for respondent (through
VC).
1. Arguments on the present appeal heard.
2. Put up for remaining arguments, if any or for orders on
14.10.2025.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 16 of 51 --
SC No. 543/2018, IA No. 04/2025
STATE VS. Veerpal
FIR No. 476/2015
PS: Harsh Vihar
06.10.2025
File is taken up on an application seeking release of surety/RC
of vehicle bearing No. DL5SBS2915 moved on behalf of surety namely
Amit Singh.
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Ld. Counsel for applicant/surety.
1. Ld. Counsel for applicant/surety submits that present
application has been moved on behalf of the applicant/surety Amit Singh
seeking release of original RC of his vehicle number DL5SBS2915.
2. Submissions heard. Record perused.
3. Perusal of order dated 16.02.2024 reveals that present case
FIR was quashed vide order dated 12.01.2024 passed by the Hon’ble High
Court of Delhi and consequently proceedings in the present matter were
cancelled and the bail bonds of the accused persons were cancelled and all
the sureties were discharged and a direction was issued that original
documents, if any, be released to its rightful claimant as per rules and
endorsement of the documents, if any, be cancelled. Since, the direction to
release the original documents to the rightful claimant has already been
passed vide order dated 16.02.2024 and there is no requirement of any fresh
directions in this regard, therefore, the present application is dismissed as
infructuous.
4. Copy of this order be given dasti to Ld. Counsel for
applicant/surety. File be consigned to record room.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 17 of 51 --
CA No. 115/2025
Kusum Dhadwal Vs. State
06.10.2025
Present: Ms. Sandhaya Gupta, Ld. Counsel for appellant/convict
(through VC).
Sh. Varchaswa Singh, Ld. Counsel for appellant/convict
(in Court).
Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State/respondent.
Respondent no. 2 alongwith Ld. Counsel Sh. Bhairav
Das.
1. A copy of the Appeal and related documents is supplied to the
Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 2.
2. Ld. Counsel for appellant has submitted that an application
seeking exemption to deposit 20% of the compensation/ fine amount is also
pending and is listed today.
3. Arguments on the aforesaid application heard.
4. Vide separate order, the application seeking exemption from
depositing 20 % of fine/compensation amount moved on behalf of the
appellant/convict is dismissed with a direction to deposit the 20% of the
compensation/fine amount before the Ld. Trial Court within a week from
this order.
5. At this stage, Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 2 seeks
adjournment to address arguments on the present Appeal while submitting
that he requires some time to go through the Appeal before addressing
arguments on the same.
6. Submissions heard. Record perused. Adjournment sought is
granted.
7. Put up for arguments on the present Appeal on 05.12.2025.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 18 of 51 --
CA No. 115/2025, IA No. 01/2025
Kusum Dhadwal Vs. State
06.10.2025
This is an application moved on behalf of appellant/
convict seeking exemption from depositing 20 % of the compensation/
fine amout.
Present: Ms. Sandhaya Gupta, Ld. Counsel for applicant/
appellant/convict (through VC).
Sh. Varchaswa Singh, Ld. Counsel for applicant/
appellant/convict (in Court).
Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State/respondent.
Respondent no. 2 alongwith Ld. Counsel Sh. Bhairav
Das.
1. Ld. Counsel for the appellant/convict submits that the
appellant is a single mother of a 20-year-old male child; that the Ld.
Trial Court has erroneously passed the impugned judgment against
her, without due consideration of the material facts; that the
appellant/convict is currently unemployed, having resigned from her
banking position in 2023, and is therefore not in a financial position to
comply with the direction of this Hon’ble Court dated 04.08.2025 to
deposit 20% of the compensation/fine amount. Accordingly, it is
prayed that the appellant may be exempted from depositing the said
amount, to enable her to pursue the present appeal on merits.
2. Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 2 opposes the application
while submitting that the appellant was directed to deposit 20% of the
compensation/fine amount within 60 days of the order dated
04.08.2025, however, the appellant has failed to comply with the said
direction and has willfully disobeyed the order of this Hon’ble Court.
The present application has been filed only on 02.09.2025 i.e. nearly a
-- 19 of 51 --
month after the passing of the said order and without sufficient cause
for the delay or non-compliance.
3. Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 2 has further argued that
the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,
1881, was originally filed on 29.10.2015, and a significant amount of
time has already elapsed; that the plea of financial incapacity raised by
the appellant is wrong since, the appellant/convict is employed as a
Regional Manager in a bank and draws a substantial salary and she is
regularly being represented by two private Counsels before the Court.
It is further argued that the appellant/convict had furnished a FDR of
Rs. 2,00,000/- as surety at the time of furnishing her bail bond before
the Trial Court and she had also moved an application seeking
permission to travel abroad in the month of March/April, 2025, which
demonstrates that she possesses sufficient means to comply with the
direction of this Court and deposit 20% of the compensation/fine
amount.
4. At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that
though the appellant/convict has left her banking job in the year 2023,
however, subsequently she was employed in a different organization
and the foreign trip in question was organised by her employer. It is
further submitted that the appellant has resigned from the said
employment in the month of August, 2025 and is currently
unemployed.
5. In response, Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 2 has argued
that no documentary proof or evidence is placed on record which
shows that appellant/convict is not currently employed; that even for
the sake of argument argument advanced by Ld. Counsel for
appellant/convict is considered true, then also, appellant/convict
-- 20 of 51 --
remained gainfully employed even after 2023 and till August, 2025.
Further, it was the informed decision of the appellant/convict to resign
from her job and has no bearing on the present case. Therefore, it can
reasonably be inferred that the appellant possesses adequate financial
means to comply with the direction of this Hon’ble Court and deposit
20% of the compensation/fine amount.
4. Submissions heard. Record perused.
5. At this stage, it is relevant to refer to Section 148 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which reads as under:
148. Power of Appellate Court to order payment pending appeal
against conviction
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973, in an appeal by the drawer against conviction under
section 138, the Appellate Court may order the appellant to deposit
such sum which shall be a minimum of twenty per cent of the fine or
compensation awarded by the trial Court:
Provided that the amount payable under this sub-section shall be in
addition to any interim compensation paid by the appellant under
section 143A.
(2) The amount referred to in sub-section (1) shall be deposited within
sixty days from the date of the order, or within such further period not
exceeding thirty days as may be directed by the Appellate Court on
sufficient cause being shown by the appellant.
(3) The Appellate Court may direct the release of the amount
deposited by the appellant to the complainant at any time during the
pendency of the appeal:
Provided that if the appellant is acquitted, the Court shall direct the
complainant to repay to the appellant the amount so released, with
interest at the bank rate as published by the Reserve Bank of India,
prevalent at the beginning of the relevant financial year, within sixty
days from the date of such order.
6. The objective of Section 148 of NI Act is to strengthen
the enforcement mechanism for cheque dishonour cases under Section
138 NI Act and to ensure greater accountability on the part of the
-- 21 of 51 --
convicted person during the pendency of an appeal. Recognizing the
delay caused by frivolous or dilatory appeals, the legislature
introduced Section 148 of NI Act through the Negotiable Instruments
(Amendment) Act, 2018 to deter such tactics and ensure that
complainants are not unduly prejudiced after securing a conviction.
By imposing condition of a minimum deposit of 20% of the
compensation or fine amount, the provision balances the appellant’s
right to appeal with the complainant’s right to timely justice. The
deposit acts as a safeguard against meritless appeals and underscores
that once a person is convicted, the presumption of innocence no
longer operates. Thus, the provision furthers both judicial efficiency
and public confidence in the sanctity of financial instruments such as
cheques.
7. In the present case, the sole ground urged by the
appellant/convict is that she is unable to arrange funds to deposit 20%
of the compensation/fine amount as directed by the order dated
04.08.2025. However, no supporting documents have been placed on
record to substantiate her claim of financial hardship. Apart from the
bald assertion, the appellant/convict has not shown any exceptional
circumstances that would justify exemption from the statutory
requirement under Section 148 of the NI Act.
Having regard to the fact that the original complaint
under Section 138 NI Act was filed nearly a decade ago in October
2015 and considering the statutory rights of the complainant as a
victim of a dishonoured cheque and in balancing the equities and the
legislative intent underlying Section 148, this Court finds no sufficient
or compelling reason to interfere with the direction requiring the
deposit of 20% of the compensation/fine amount. The appellant/
-- 22 of 51 --
convict has failed to establish genuine financial incapacity or any
exceptional hardship warranting waiver of the statutory requirement.
Accordingly, the present application is dismissed with a direction to
the appellant/ convict the deposit the 20% of the compensation/fine
amount before the Ld. Trial Court within a week of this order.
8. The application stands disposed of. Copy of this order be
given dasti to both the parties and be also sent to Ld. Trial Court for
information.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 23 of 51 --
Old SC No.338/2019
STATE VS. Faizal & Anr.
FIR No. 858/2014
PS: Nand Nagri
06.10.20255
Supplementary Chargesheet qua accused Faizal and Saleem
received.
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Accused persons are produced from JC.
Sh. Abbas Khan, Ld. Counsel for accused persons.
1. Perusal of the record reveals that vide Judgment dated
06.06.2024 passed by this Court, the co-accused persons i.e. Sunny and
Kranti @ Kake were acquitted for offence punishable under Section 394/34
IPC, however, co-accused Kranti @ Kaka was convicted only for offence
punishable under Section 379 IPC. Since, accused Faizal and Saleem were
declared PO vide order dated 01.08.2015 and were not arrested during the
pendency of the case, therefore, file was consigned to record room. Now,
the accused Faizal and Saleem are finally arrested on 02.09.2025 and
supplementary charge qua them has been filed.
2. Ahlmad is directed to get the present case restored to its
original number through Computer Branch forthwith.
3. At this stage, Ld Counsel for accused persons seeks some
time to address arguments on charge.
4. Submissions heard. Record perused. Adjournment sought is
granted.
5. Put up for arguments on Charge on 22.12.2025. Date is given
at the specific request and convenience of Ld. Counsel for accused persons.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 24 of 51 --
SC No. 485/2018, IA No. 30/2025
STATE VS. Suheb
FIR No. 351/2018
PS: Nand Nagri
U/s 302/364A/120B/34 IPC
06.10.2025
File is taken up on an application seeking direction to the
Jail Superintendent to submit medical treatment/health status of
applicant/accused Suheb and also seeking direction to get the
applicant/accused treated in G.B. Pant Hospital, Delhi.
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Sh. Rohit Sharma, Ld. proxy Counsel for accused/
applicant.
1. Medical Status Report from the concerned Jail
Superintendent received, copy of the same be supplied to Ld. Counsel
for applicant/accused.
2. As per the Medical Status Report, applicant/accused is on
regular treatment and follow-up from Cardiology Department-
Safdarjung Hospital and is a known case of RHD (Rheumatic Heart
Disease) with severe MS (Mitral Valve Stenosis) and mild TR
(Tricuspid Regurgitation) with supraventricular tachycardia (AV
Nodal re-entry tract) with successful RFA (Radio Frequency
Ablation). The applicant/accused was last reviewed in Cardiology
OPD, Safdarjung Hospital on 28.08.2025 where he was advised
medications for three months. The applicant/accused was reviewed in
Surgery Department- DDU Hospital on 01.10.2025 wherein, it was
noted that applicant/accused had paid in left side of chest and on
examination, no wound seen on the right side of chest.
3. Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused has submitted that
-- 25 of 51 --
since, applicant/accused is known case of RHD (Rheumatic Heart
Disease) with severe MS (Mitral Valve Stenosis) and mild TR
(Tricuspid Regurgitation) with supraventricular tachycardia (AV
Nodal re-entry tract) with successful RFA (Radio Frequency
Ablation), he requires intensive medical check-up and treatment from
a specialized hospital, therefore, he may be directed to be referred to
GB Pant Hospital.
4. Submissions heard. Record perused.
5. Considering the medical condition of the applicant/
accused Suheb, the nature of ailment and requirement of the
specialized treatment and also considering the request of the
applicant/accused, the applicant/accused Suheb may be referred to GB
Pant Hospital, Delhi, which is also a Government Hospital. Concerned
Jail Superintendent is directed to provide due medical care and
attention to the applicant/accused, as per rules.
6. Copy of this order be sent to concerned Jail
Superintendent and be also given dasti to Ld. Counsel for
applicant/accused.
7. The application stands disposed of.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 26 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 27 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 28 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 29 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 30 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 31 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 32 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 33 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 34 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 35 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 36 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 37 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 38 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 39 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 40 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 41 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 42 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 43 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 44 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 45 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 46 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 47 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 48 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 49 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 50 of 51 --
Rohit
SC No.
STATE VS.
FIR No.
PS
06.10.2025
Present: Sh. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/06.10.2025
-- 51 of 51 --