Skip to main content
Court Order

Interim Order 6

CNR DLSH01003967202418 Jul 2025
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Interim Order 6 · 18 Jul 2025 · CNR DLSH010039672024

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CA No. 177/2024
Perfect Wellness Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Ashu Agarwal
18.07.2025
Present: Ms. Gauri Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the appellants.
Respondent in person.
1. Ld. Counsel for the appellants submits that vide
Judgment dated 31.01.2024, the accused persons/appellants were
convicted by the Ld. Trial Court under Section 138 of Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881 in a case titled as “Ashu Agarwal Vs. Perfect
Welness Pvt. Ltd”, CT NO. 2997/2020, PS Madhu Vihar. It is further
submitted that vide order on Sentence dated 24.05.2024, all the
accused persons i.e. M/s Perfect Wellness Pvt. Ltd (accused no. 1), Sh.
Ankit Agarwal (accused no. 2) and Sh. Raunak Agarwal (accused no.
3) were directed to pay a total sum of Rs. 31,35,032/- to the
complainant (Sh. Ashu Agarwal/respondent herein) as compensation.
2. Ld. Counsel further submits that convicts/accused
persons preferred appeals against the Judgment dated 31.01.2024 and
Order on Sentence dated 24.05.2024; that one of the Appeal filed by
the Sh. Ankit Agarwal (accused no. 2) was pending before the Court
of Sh. Kumar Rajat, Ld. ASJ-07, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts,
Delhi, however, the other Appeal filed by the Sh. Raunak Agarwal
(accused number 3), who is appellant no. 2 herein is pending before
this Hon’ble Court. The accused no. 1 i.e. M/s Perfect Wellness Pvt.
Ltd. and accused no. 2 i.e. Sh. Ankit Agarwal compounded the matter
with the complainant Sh. Ashu Agarwal (respondent herein) and paid
the entire compensation/fine amount to him; that vide order dated
-- 1 of 2 --
05.06.2024, Sh. Kumar Rajat, Ld. ASJ-07, Shahdara, Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi set aside the Judgment dated 31.01.2024 and Order on
Sentence dated 24.05.2024 and appellant Sh. Ankit Agarwal was
acquitted in view of the full and final settlement between the parties.
3. It is further submitted that an adjournment be granted, the
appellant Sh. Raunak Agarwal will appear on the next date of hearing
and will try to enter into a fresh settlement between complainant Sh.
Ashu Agarwal failing which the appellants would argue the matter on
the basis of settlement already entered into between the complainant/
respondent and the remaining accused persons on the next date of
hearing.
4. Submissions heard. Record perused.
5. Put up for arguments on the present Appeal on
21.11.2025. A long date is given at the request of both the parties
since, they require some time to enter into a settlement.
(SURABHI SHARMA VATS)
ASJ-04/Shahdara/KKD Courts,
Delhi/18.07.2025
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.