SAROJ SEHGALVsSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 8
MISC DJ497/23
SAROJ SEHGAL Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
06.12.2023
Present: Sh. Rupesh Tyagi and Ms. Rajni Negi, ld. Counsels
for the applicant.
Fresh form no. 178 and 179, as per section 317 of
Indian Succession Act, 1925, has filed on behalf of petitioner.
I have perused the application along with the
inventory filed by the applicant.
It pertains only with respect to the valuation of the
immovable property i.e. ground floor, house no. 199, D-Block,
Delhi-95.
Accordingly, the application is allowed.
It is submitted by ld. Counsel for the petitioner that
the petitioner was the sole beneficiary/legatee of the deceased
testator, and the surety may be discharged.
In view of the submissions of ld. Counsel for the
petitioner, the surety stands discharged.
File be consigned to Record Room, after due
compliance.
(Ankur Jain-II)
Additional District Judge-02, Shd District
Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 06.12.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16MISC DJ497/23SAROJ SEHGAL Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
13.09.2023
Present: Ms. Ritu, Ld. Counsel for the applicant/ petitioner.
Applicant has filed the present application to place on record
the inventory and accounts of property bearing no. D-199, Ground Floor,
Vivek Vihar, Delhi.
Perusal of the record shows in the annexed form no. 178, the
pincode of the property wrongly mentioned as 48.
Ld. Counsel for the applicant undertakes to correct the said
error by filing fresh form no. 178.
Put up for consideration along with main case file on
06.12.2023.
(Ankur Jain)
Addl. District Judge-02, Shd, KKD
Delhi/ 13.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16MISC DJ497/23SAROJ SEHGAL Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
13.09.2023
Present: Ms. Ritu, Ld. Counsel for the applicant/ petitioner.
Applicant has filed the present application to place on record
the inventory and accounts of property bearing no. D-199, Ground Floor,
Vivek Vihar, Delhi.
Perusal of the record shows in the annexed form no. 178, the
pincode of the property wrongly mentioned as 48.
Ld. Counsel for the applicant undertakes to correct the said
error by filing fresh form no. 178.
Put up for consideration along with main case file on
06.12.2023.
(Ankur Jain)
Addl. District Judge-02, Shd, KKD
Delhi/ 13.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --