Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 2

CNR DLSH01003671202403 Jan 2025
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 2 · 03 Jan 2025 · CNR DLSH010036712024

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3 CS 349/24
MOHD. KHALID VS. CHARU GUPTA
03.01.2025
Present: Ms. , Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ms. Ruksana, Ld. Counsel for the defendants no.8 to
10 (through VC).
Perusal of the record shows that defendants no.1 and
2 were served on 22.07.2024 and their counsel Sh. Shailesh had
also appeared on their behalf on 17.08.2024, however, no WS has
been filed on behalf of defendants no.1 and 2 till date nor any
one has appeared on their behalf today despite several calls.
Accordingly, right of defendants no.1 and 2 to file
WS hereby stands closed.
No WS has also been filed on behalf of defendants
no.8 to 10 since 17.08.2024.
Accordingly, right of defendants no.8 to 10 to file
WS also stands closed.
Affidavit of service alongwith copy of tracking
report, speed post receipts, Whatsapp and Email filed on behalf
of plaintiff.
Let fresh summons of the plaint along with
documents be issued upon the defendants no.3 to 7, through all
modes, including speed post/Registered AD, on filing PF/RC.
Steps be taken within 07 days.
At request of Ld. Counsel for plaintiff, process be
also issued dasti to the plaintiff, through concerned District
Judge, U. P.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff presses for
her application U/o 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC seeking restraint upon
defendants no.1 and 2 from making defamatory statements
against the plaintiff, whereby they are alleging plaintiff to be a
Con-man and an Imposter and also provoking public sentiment
against the religion of plaintiff by publicly comparing him with
deceased Gangsters Atiq Ahmed and Mukhtar Ansari with the
personal pictures of the plaintiff; and also seeks relief against
defendants no.3 to 10 thereby directing them to take down the
videos uploaded in this regard on their official channels and
Twitter handles.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff fairly submits that no
such defamatory statement has been made on behalf of the
defendants no.1 and 2 against the plaintiff, as per the knowledge
of the plaintiff, since the filing of the present suit.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks time to bring
appropriate judgment in support of her submissions on NDOH.
Put up for service of defendants no.3 to 7/ arguments
on application U/o 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC on 03.04.2025.
(Ankur Jain-II)
DJ-02, SHD District
KKD/Delhi 03.01.2025
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.