Final Order 1

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Page 1/4
Bail Matter No. 405/2026
STATE GNCTD Vs. SURAJ KANT
Bail Matter No. 406/2026
STATE GNCTD Vs. SURINDER KUMAR
Bail Matter No.407/2026
STATE GNCTD Vs. SUNITA
Bail Matter No. 408/2026
STATE GNCTD Vs. REENA
Bail Matter No. 409/2026
STATE GNCTD Vs. POOJA RANI
FIR No. 602/2025
PS (Harash Vihar)
U/S 406/498A/34 IPC
08.04.2026
Present: Sh. Jitendra Sharma, Ld. Addl. PP for the State.
Sh. Manu Dhama, Ld. LAC for the applicants /
accused.
IO ASI Jagdish Dhaka in person.
Complainant in person.
These are the applications U/s 482 BNSS moved on
behalf of applicants/ accused persons namely Suraj Kant, Surinder
Kumar, Sunita, Reena and Pooja Rani for grant of anticipatory
bails.
A common reply to the present anticipatory bail
applications filed by IO. Same is taken on record. Copy of the
same supplied to Ld. Counsel for applicants/ accused persons.
Arguments on the present anticipatory bail
applications, heard.
-- 1 of 4 --
Page 2/4
Put up the present anticipatory bail applications for
orders at 4:00 pm.
(Gajender Singh Nagar)
Special Judge, NDPS
Shahdara Distt./KKD/08.04.2026
At 4.00 p.m.
ORDER
1. Vide this common order, the undersigned shall decide five
anticipatory bail applications U/s 482 BNSS moved on behalf of
applicants/ accused persons namely Suraj Kant (brother in-law),
Surinder Kumar (father in-law), Sunita (mother in-law), Reena
and Pooja Rani (sister in-law) for grant of anticipatory bail.
2. It is contended by Ld. Counsel for applicants/ accused
persons that the applicant / accused persons are in-laws of the
victim. It is contended that the applicants / accused persons have
been falsely implicated in the present case. They have duly joined
investigation as and when required by the IO. Hence, it is
requested that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted to
applicants/ accused persons.
3. The prosecutrix / complainant submits that bail may not be
given to the applicants / accused persons as they harassed her.
They are not giving any right in the property or maintenance to her
& her son. Thus anticipatory bail may not be granted to the
applicants / accused persons.
4. Today, reply filed by IO stating therein that he has already
filed chargesheet in the present matter without arresting the
-- 2 of 4 --
Page 3/4
applicants / accused persons. Custodial interrogation of the
applicants/ accused persons is not required in the present matter.
5. Heard. Record perused.
6. Considering the fact that none of the offences in question
is punishable with imprisonment for more than seven years. Since
the investigation in the present case has been completed. Further,
IO did not require custodial interrogation of the applicants /
accused persons.
7. In such circumstances, the applicants/ accused persons
namely Suraj Kant, Surinder Kumar, Sunita, Reena and Pooja
Rani, are admitted to anticipatory bail and in case of their arrest,
they may be released on furnishing their personal bonds in the sum
of Rs.10,000/- each with one surety each of the like amount to the
satisfaction of IO/ SHO/ Ld. Judicial Magistrate First Class/ Link
Judicial Magistrate First Class/ Duty Judicial Magistrate First
Class concerned, subject to the conditions mentioned herein
below: -
i) That the applicants/ accused persons shall join the
further investigation, if any as and when required by the IO
or as directed by the Court;
ii) That the applicants/ accused persons shall convey
any change of address immediately to the IO and to the
Court;
iii) That the applicants/ accused persons shall not leave
the Country without prior permission of the Court;
iv) That the applicants/ accused persons will not induce/
threaten the complainant/ victim, her family and witnesses
or tamper the evidence, in any manner;
v) That the applicants/ accused persons shall not
indulge in/ commit any kind of activities as alleged against
them in the present case;
-- 3 of 4 --
Page 4/4
vi) That the applicants/ accused persons shall attend the
Court proceedings regularly.
8. Nothing expressed here-in-above, shall tantamount to any
opinion on the merits of this case.
9. Copy of this order be given dasti to Ld. Counsel for
applicants/ accused persons and to the IO, as per rules.
(Gajender Singh Nagar)
Special Judge (NDPS Act)
Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts
Delhi/08.04.2026
-- 4 of 4 --