SONUVsASHISH GUPTA

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6 MACT 220/24
SONU vs. ASHISH GUPTA
27.08.2025
Today the Advocates are abstaining from work.
Present:- Proxy counsel for the petitioner through
videoconferencing.
Proxy counsel for respondent no.1 through
videoconferencing.
It is submitted by proxy counsel for the petitioner
that talks of settlement are in progress. Matter is adjourned.
Put up for verification of settlement/ Pre-Lok Adalat
on 10.09.2025.
(Vijay Kumar Jha)
PO (MACT-01)/SHD/Delhi
27.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 13 MACT 220/24
SONU vs. ASHISH GUPTA
23.07.2025
Present:- Sh. Lakshya Kumar, proxy counsel for the petitioner.
Ms. Sonia Singh, proxy counsel for respondent no.2.
Sh. Milind Awasthi, Ld. counsel for
respondent/insurance co.
On behalf of respondent no.2 written statement filed.
From the submissions of Ld. counsel for
respondent/insurance co., it appears that matter can be settled.
Put up for pre Lok Adalat on 27.08.2025.
(Vijay Kumar Jha)
PO (MACT-01)/SHD/Delhi
23.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 2 MACT 220/24
Sonu Vs. Ashish Gupta
09.05.2025
Present:- Sh. Harsh Kumar, proxy counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. Milind Awasthi, Ld. counsel for respondent
no.1/insurance co.
Sh. Sanjay Bhardwaj, Ld. counsel for respondent
no.2 through V/C.
Also Ms. Tarita, Proxy Ld. counsel for respondent
no.2.
Separate vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent
no.1 and respondent no.2.
Copy of claim petition is supplied to proxy counsel
for respondent no.2, who is present in the court.
Respondent no.1/insurance co. has filed its written
statement. Copy supplied.
Petitioner to file the certified copy of charge-sheet of
criminal case.
Respondent no.2 to file its written statement on or
before NDOH.
Put up for framing of issues on 23.07.2025.
(Vijay Kumar Jha)
PO (MACT-01)/SHD/Delhi
09.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 MACT 220/24
Sonu Vs. Ashish Gupta
23.01.2025
Present:- Proxy counsel for the petitioner.
Matter is passed over till 11.00 a.m.
(Vijay Kumar Jha)
PO (MACT-01)/SHD/Delhi
23.01.2025
At 11.40 a.m.
Present:- Sh. Rajni Kant, Ld. counsel for the petitioner.
In compliance of Rule 8 (2) (b) of Delhi MACT
Rules, 2008 on behalf of petitioner list of witnesses along with
affidavit of evidence of petitioner no.1 and the eye witness at sr.
no.2 i.e. Yash Kumar along with copy of criminal case have been
filed.
The Tribunal deems it sufficient complaince of Rule
8 (2) (b) of Delhi MACT Rules, 2008.
Issue notice of the claim petition to all the
respondents on filing of PF through all modes, returnable on
09.05.2025.
(Vijay Kumar Jha)
PO (MACT-01)/SHD/Delhi
23.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 MACT 220/24
Sonu Vs. Ashish Gupta
21.10.2024
Present:- Sh. Amit Parashar, Proxy counsel for the petitioner.
The matter was fixed for compliance of Rule 8 (2)
(b) of Delhi MACT Rules, 2008. The list of witness has been
filed. Only filing of list of witnesses is not sufficient compliance
of above said rules.
At request, matter is adjourned.
Put up for compliance of Rule 8 (2) (b) of Delhi
MACT Rules, 2008 /consideration on 23.01.2025.
(Vijay Kumar Jha)
PO (MACT-01)/SHD/Delhi
21.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 MACT 220/24
Sonu Vs. Ashish Gupta
25.07.2024
Present:- Ms. Poonam, Ld. counsel for the petitioner.
At the request of Ld. Counsel for the petitioner,
matter is adjourned.
Put up for compliance of Rule 8 (2) (b) of Delhi
MACT Rules, 2008 on 21.10.2024.
(Vijay Kumar Jha)
PO MACT-01/SHD/Delhi
25.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: MACT no.220/2024
Sonu & Ors. v. Go Digit GIC Ltd. & Anr.
24.05.2024
Present:- Ms. Priyanka, proxy counsel for the petitioners.
It is submitted by leaned proxy counsel for the petitioners that
as per practice in Ghaziabad, no DAR is filed there and she undertakes that
if any DAR is filed before the concerned Claims Tribunal, certified copy of
the same shall be filed. Be that as it may. As per Rule-8(b) of ‘Delhi Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal Rules-2008’ along with the claim petition, the
petitioner is required to file all requisite documents and affidavits of
witnesses as proof of all the facts which have been stated in the claim
petition. Hence, as per said rules, along with the petition, the petitioner is
required to file not only the documents but also affidavits of the witnesses
to whom he wishes to examine. In this case, petitioner has not complied
with the Rule-8 of the above Rules, which is mandated as per Form-G of
the claim petition. Let the requisite documents be filed on next date of
hearing.
Put up for consideration on 25.07.2024.
(Vijay Kumar Jha)
PO MACT-01/SHD/Delhi
24.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: MACT no. 220/2024
Sonu & Ors. v. Go Digit GIC Ltd. & Anr.
28.03.2024
Fresh claim petition received. It be checked and registered.
Present : Sh. Rajnikant, proxy counsel for the petitioners.
This is a claim petition under section 166 of M.V. Act, 1988.
As per the claim petition, a fatal accident had occurred on 31.01.2024 at
08:00 p.m. in which, the deceased had expired. The accident had occurred
within the jurisdiction of PS Indirapuram, Ghaziabad, U.P.
Issue notice to the concerned SHO/ IO to apprise this Tribunal
on the next date as to the status of DAR whether the same has been filed or
not, if not filed, reasons thereof, on filing PF by the petitioners.
Put up for further proceedings on 24.05.2024.
(Vijay Kumar Jha)
PO-MACT-01/SHD/KKD
Delhi/28.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6 MACT 220/24
SONU vs. ASHISH GUPTA
27.08.2025
Today the Advocates are abstaining from work.
Present:- Proxy counsel for the petitioner through
videoconferencing.
Proxy counsel for respondent no.1 through
videoconferencing.
It is submitted by proxy counsel for the petitioner
that talks of settlement are in progress. Matter is adjourned.
Put up for verification of settlement/ Pre-Lok Adalat
on 10.09.2025.
(Vijay Kumar Jha)
PO (MACT-01)/SHD/Delhi
27.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 13 MACT 220/24
SONU vs. ASHISH GUPTA
23.07.2025
Present:- Sh. Lakshya Kumar, proxy counsel for the petitioner.
Ms. Sonia Singh, proxy counsel for respondent no.2.
Sh. Milind Awasthi, Ld. counsel for
respondent/insurance co.
On behalf of respondent no.2 written statement filed.
From the submissions of Ld. counsel for
respondent/insurance co., it appears that matter can be settled.
Put up for pre Lok Adalat on 27.08.2025.
(Vijay Kumar Jha)
PO (MACT-01)/SHD/Delhi
23.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 2 MACT 220/24
Sonu Vs. Ashish Gupta
09.05.2025
Present:- Sh. Harsh Kumar, proxy counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. Milind Awasthi, Ld. counsel for respondent
no.1/insurance co.
Sh. Sanjay Bhardwaj, Ld. counsel for respondent
no.2 through V/C.
Also Ms. Tarita, Proxy Ld. counsel for respondent
no.2.
Separate vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent
no.1 and respondent no.2.
Copy of claim petition is supplied to proxy counsel
for respondent no.2, who is present in the court.
Respondent no.1/insurance co. has filed its written
statement. Copy supplied.
Petitioner to file the certified copy of charge-sheet of
criminal case.
Respondent no.2 to file its written statement on or
before NDOH.
Put up for framing of issues on 23.07.2025.
(Vijay Kumar Jha)
PO (MACT-01)/SHD/Delhi
09.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 MACT 220/24
Sonu Vs. Ashish Gupta
23.01.2025
Present:- Proxy counsel for the petitioner.
Matter is passed over till 11.00 a.m.
(Vijay Kumar Jha)
PO (MACT-01)/SHD/Delhi
23.01.2025
At 11.40 a.m.
Present:- Sh. Rajni Kant, Ld. counsel for the petitioner.
In compliance of Rule 8 (2) (b) of Delhi MACT
Rules, 2008 on behalf of petitioner list of witnesses along with
affidavit of evidence of petitioner no.1 and the eye witness at sr.
no.2 i.e. Yash Kumar along with copy of criminal case have been
filed.
The Tribunal deems it sufficient complaince of Rule
8 (2) (b) of Delhi MACT Rules, 2008.
Issue notice of the claim petition to all the
respondents on filing of PF through all modes, returnable on
09.05.2025.
(Vijay Kumar Jha)
PO (MACT-01)/SHD/Delhi
23.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 MACT 220/24
Sonu Vs. Ashish Gupta
21.10.2024
Present:- Sh. Amit Parashar, Proxy counsel for the petitioner.
The matter was fixed for compliance of Rule 8 (2)
(b) of Delhi MACT Rules, 2008. The list of witness has been
filed. Only filing of list of witnesses is not sufficient compliance
of above said rules.
At request, matter is adjourned.
Put up for compliance of Rule 8 (2) (b) of Delhi
MACT Rules, 2008 /consideration on 23.01.2025.
(Vijay Kumar Jha)
PO (MACT-01)/SHD/Delhi
21.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 MACT 220/24
Sonu Vs. Ashish Gupta
25.07.2024
Present:- Ms. Poonam, Ld. counsel for the petitioner.
At the request of Ld. Counsel for the petitioner,
matter is adjourned.
Put up for compliance of Rule 8 (2) (b) of Delhi
MACT Rules, 2008 on 21.10.2024.
(Vijay Kumar Jha)
PO MACT-01/SHD/Delhi
25.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: MACT no.220/2024
Sonu & Ors. v. Go Digit GIC Ltd. & Anr.
24.05.2024
Present:- Ms. Priyanka, proxy counsel for the petitioners.
It is submitted by leaned proxy counsel for the petitioners that
as per practice in Ghaziabad, no DAR is filed there and she undertakes that
if any DAR is filed before the concerned Claims Tribunal, certified copy of
the same shall be filed. Be that as it may. As per Rule-8(b) of ‘Delhi Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal Rules-2008’ along with the claim petition, the
petitioner is required to file all requisite documents and affidavits of
witnesses as proof of all the facts which have been stated in the claim
petition. Hence, as per said rules, along with the petition, the petitioner is
required to file not only the documents but also affidavits of the witnesses
to whom he wishes to examine. In this case, petitioner has not complied
with the Rule-8 of the above Rules, which is mandated as per Form-G of
the claim petition. Let the requisite documents be filed on next date of
hearing.
Put up for consideration on 25.07.2024.
(Vijay Kumar Jha)
PO MACT-01/SHD/Delhi
24.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: MACT no. 220/2024
Sonu & Ors. v. Go Digit GIC Ltd. & Anr.
28.03.2024
Fresh claim petition received. It be checked and registered.
Present : Sh. Rajnikant, proxy counsel for the petitioners.
This is a claim petition under section 166 of M.V. Act, 1988.
As per the claim petition, a fatal accident had occurred on 31.01.2024 at
08:00 p.m. in which, the deceased had expired. The accident had occurred
within the jurisdiction of PS Indirapuram, Ghaziabad, U.P.
Issue notice to the concerned SHO/ IO to apprise this Tribunal
on the next date as to the status of DAR whether the same has been filed or
not, if not filed, reasons thereof, on filing PF by the petitioners.
Put up for further proceedings on 24.05.2024.
(Vijay Kumar Jha)
PO-MACT-01/SHD/KKD
Delhi/28.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --