RAKESH DEVIVsRAJU +2 more

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
21.02.2026
Present : None for complainant.
All three accused with Ld. coiunsel Sh. Satender
Mishra.
File shows that for last several dates, none is
appearing for complainant. Let, notice be sent to complainant for
16.05.2026.
(Charu Aggarwal)
ASJ-02/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/21.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
18.10.2025
Present : None for complainant.
All three accused in person.
Sh. Pankaj Vashishth, Ld. counsel for all three accused
through VC.
Sh. Parmod Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
Adjournment sought on behalf of accused persons that
main counsel is not available. Considering that none is present for
complainant and on the request of accused persons, put up for
arguments on charge on 21.02.2026.
(Charu Aggarwal)
ASJ-02/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/18.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
02.08.2025
Present : Sh. Chandan Kanojia, Ld. proxy counsel for
complainant.
All three accused with Ld. proxy counsel Sh. Sunil
Kumar.
Sh. Parmod Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
Adjournment sought on behalf of complainant that
counsel is not available today due to personal reasons.
At request of complainant, put up for arguments on
charge on 18.10.2025.
(Charu Aggarwal)
ASJ-02/Spl. Judge: SC/ST
(POA) Act/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/02.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
31.05.2025
Present : Complainant in person with Ld. proxy counsels Sh.
Vinay Gautam and Sh. Virender Singh.
All accused present on bail with Ld. counsel
Sh. Satyendra Mishra.
Sh. Parmod Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
This complaint case is fixed for remaining
arguments/filing relevant authorities on the aforesaid aspects.
Accordingly, put up this matter for purpose fixed on
02.08.2025.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/Spl. Judge: SC/ST
(POA) Act/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/31.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
19.04.2025
Present : Complainant in person with Ld. Counsels Dr. S.P.
Gautam, Ms. Ankita Singh and Sh. Manas Chawla.
All accused present on bail except accused Dhanush
Pal with Ld. counsel Sh. Satyendra Mishra,
Sh. Sunder Bansal and Sh. Salman Saifi.
Sh. Parmod Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
This complaint case is fixed for further arguments on
the point of charge as well as on the aspect as to whether close
relatives can be considered as proper witness for the purpose of
‘public view’.
Part further arguments have been heard.
During the course of arguments, Ld. counsel for
complainant has sought adjournment for filing authorities of law in
support of his submissions.
At request, put up this matter for remaining
arguments/filing relevant authorities on the aforesaid aspects on
31.05.2025.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/Spl. Judge: SC/ST
(POA) Act/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/19.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
25.01.2025
Present : Complainant in person with Ld. Counsel
Sh. J.P. Singh and Dr. S.P. Gautam.
All accused present on bail with Ld. counsel Sh.
Satender Mishra.
None for State.
This complaint case is fixed for further arguments on
the point of charge.
Part further arguments have been heard.
Ld. counsel for complainant has sought some time to
place on record relevant authorities of law in support of his
contention that even close relatives can be considered as proper
witness for the purpose of public view as defined u/s 3(1)(X) of the
SC/ST (POA) Act 1989.
Time is granted in the interest of justice.
Put up for aforesaid purpose / remaining arguments on
the point of charge on 01.03.2025.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/Spl. Judge: SC/ST
(POA) Act/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/25.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
21.09.2024
Present : Complainant in person with Ld. counsel Sh. Shashi
Kamal.
All accused present on bail with Ld. Counsels
Sh. Satyendra Mishra and Sh. Sandesh Kumar.
Today, this complaint case is fixed for further
arguments on the point of charge.
However, main counsel for complainant is not present
today.
Accordingly, put up this matter for purpose fixed on
23.11.2024.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/Spl. Judge: SC/ST
(POA) Act/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/21.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Ct. Case No. 7/23
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju & Ors.
20.07.2024
Present : Sh. J. P. Singh, Ld. Counsel for complainant a/w
complainant.
All accused present on bail with Ld. Counsels
Sh. Satyendra Mishra, Sh. Salman Saifi and
Sh. Sandesh Kumar.
None for the State.
Today this complaint is fixed for further arguments
on the point of charge.
The regular Addl. PP for the State is on leave today
and no Substitute has been provided so far.
Accordingly, put up this complaint for said purpose
on 21.09.2024.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/E-Court (Shahdara)
KKD/Delhi/20.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
27.04.2024
Present : Complainant in person with Ld. counsel Sh. J.P. Singh.
All accused present on bail with Ld. Counsels
Sh. Satyendra Mishra and Sh. Salman Saifi.
Sh. Parmod Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
Today, this complaint case is fixed for arguments on
the point of charge.
Part arguments heard.
Put up this matter for further arguments on the point of
charge on 20.07.2024.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/Spl. Judge: SC/ST
(POA) Act/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/27.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
16.03.2024
Present : Complainant in person.
All accused present on bail with Ld. Counsel
Sh. Satyendra Mishra and Sh. Sundar Bansal. Fresh
v/n filed. Same is taken on record.
Sh. Parmod Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
Today, this complaint case is fixed for arguments on
the point of charge.
However, adjournment has been sought by
complainant as her counsel is not available today being unwell.
Accordingly, put up this matter for arguments on the
point of charge on 27.04.2024.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/Spl. Judge: SC/ST
(POA) Act/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/16.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
18.11.2023
Present : Complainant in person.
All accused present on bail with Ld. Counsel
Sh. Satender Mishra.
Sh. Parmod Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
Today, this complaint case is fixed for pre-charge
evidence.
However, fresh vakalatnama has been filed on behalf
of all accused persons today. Same is taken on record. Adjournment
has been sought by the Ld. Counsel for accused persons.
Ld. Counsel for complainant is also not present at this
stage.
Accordingly, put up this matter for purpose fixed on
27.01.2024.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/Spl. Judge: SC/ST
(POA) Act/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/18.11.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Ct. Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and Ors.
19.05.2023
Present : Complainant in person.
All accused present on bail with Ld. Counsel
Sh. Saurabh Tyagi.
Today this matter is fixed for pre-charge evidence.
However, complainant has sought sometime as the
main counsel is not present today. Adjournment is granted in the
interest of justice.
Put up this matter for purpose fixed on 26.08.2023.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/E-Court (Shahdara)
KKD/Delhi/19.05.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
06.03.2023
Present : None for complainant.
Accused Parveen @ Monu and Dhanush Pal present
on bail.
Accused Raju present with Ld. Counsel (Fresh v/n
filed. Same is taken on record).
Sh. Vikas Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
This complaint case is fixed for filing of proper bail
application on behalf of accused Raju.
In compliance of the last order, bail application u/s
439 Cr. PC has been filed by the said accused supported by an
affidavit. Copy has been supplied to the State.
Issue notice to the complainant for NDOH.
Put up this matter for consideration on regular bail
application of accused Raju / FP on 15.03.2023. Interim order to
continue till NDOH.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/Spl. Judge: SC/ST
(POA) Act/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/06.03.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Ct. Case No. 7/2023
RAKESH DEVI Vs. RAJU
16.05.2026
Present : Complainant in person.
Accused Monu absent.
Remaining two accused with Ld. Counsels
Sh. Satyender Mishra and Mohd. Imteyazullah for
all accused.
Exemption application filed on behalf of accused
Monu. Heard and allowed for today.
Adjournment sought on behalf of complainant on
the ground that her counsel is not available today. At her request,
put up for arguments on charge on 01.08.2026.
(Charu Aggarwal)
ASJ-02/E-Court (Shahdara)
KKD/Delhi/16.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
21.02.2026
Present : None for complainant.
All three accused with Ld. coiunsel Sh. Satender
Mishra.
File shows that for last several dates, none is
appearing for complainant. Let, notice be sent to complainant for
16.05.2026.
(Charu Aggarwal)
ASJ-02/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/21.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
18.10.2025
Present : None for complainant.
All three accused in person.
Sh. Pankaj Vashishth, Ld. counsel for all three accused
through VC.
Sh. Parmod Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
Adjournment sought on behalf of accused persons that
main counsel is not available. Considering that none is present for
complainant and on the request of accused persons, put up for
arguments on charge on 21.02.2026.
(Charu Aggarwal)
ASJ-02/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/18.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
02.08.2025
Present : Sh. Chandan Kanojia, Ld. proxy counsel for
complainant.
All three accused with Ld. proxy counsel Sh. Sunil
Kumar.
Sh. Parmod Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
Adjournment sought on behalf of complainant that
counsel is not available today due to personal reasons.
At request of complainant, put up for arguments on
charge on 18.10.2025.
(Charu Aggarwal)
ASJ-02/Spl. Judge: SC/ST
(POA) Act/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/02.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
31.05.2025
Present : Complainant in person with Ld. proxy counsels Sh.
Vinay Gautam and Sh. Virender Singh.
All accused present on bail with Ld. counsel
Sh. Satyendra Mishra.
Sh. Parmod Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
This complaint case is fixed for remaining
arguments/filing relevant authorities on the aforesaid aspects.
Accordingly, put up this matter for purpose fixed on
02.08.2025.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/Spl. Judge: SC/ST
(POA) Act/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/31.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
19.04.2025
Present : Complainant in person with Ld. Counsels Dr. S.P.
Gautam, Ms. Ankita Singh and Sh. Manas Chawla.
All accused present on bail except accused Dhanush
Pal with Ld. counsel Sh. Satyendra Mishra,
Sh. Sunder Bansal and Sh. Salman Saifi.
Sh. Parmod Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
This complaint case is fixed for further arguments on
the point of charge as well as on the aspect as to whether close
relatives can be considered as proper witness for the purpose of
‘public view’.
Part further arguments have been heard.
During the course of arguments, Ld. counsel for
complainant has sought adjournment for filing authorities of law in
support of his submissions.
At request, put up this matter for remaining
arguments/filing relevant authorities on the aforesaid aspects on
31.05.2025.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/Spl. Judge: SC/ST
(POA) Act/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/19.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
25.01.2025
Present : Complainant in person with Ld. Counsel
Sh. J.P. Singh and Dr. S.P. Gautam.
All accused present on bail with Ld. counsel Sh.
Satender Mishra.
None for State.
This complaint case is fixed for further arguments on
the point of charge.
Part further arguments have been heard.
Ld. counsel for complainant has sought some time to
place on record relevant authorities of law in support of his
contention that even close relatives can be considered as proper
witness for the purpose of public view as defined u/s 3(1)(X) of the
SC/ST (POA) Act 1989.
Time is granted in the interest of justice.
Put up for aforesaid purpose / remaining arguments on
the point of charge on 01.03.2025.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/Spl. Judge: SC/ST
(POA) Act/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/25.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
21.09.2024
Present : Complainant in person with Ld. counsel Sh. Shashi
Kamal.
All accused present on bail with Ld. Counsels
Sh. Satyendra Mishra and Sh. Sandesh Kumar.
Today, this complaint case is fixed for further
arguments on the point of charge.
However, main counsel for complainant is not present
today.
Accordingly, put up this matter for purpose fixed on
23.11.2024.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/Spl. Judge: SC/ST
(POA) Act/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/21.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Ct. Case No. 7/23
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju & Ors.
20.07.2024
Present : Sh. J. P. Singh, Ld. Counsel for complainant a/w
complainant.
All accused present on bail with Ld. Counsels
Sh. Satyendra Mishra, Sh. Salman Saifi and
Sh. Sandesh Kumar.
None for the State.
Today this complaint is fixed for further arguments
on the point of charge.
The regular Addl. PP for the State is on leave today
and no Substitute has been provided so far.
Accordingly, put up this complaint for said purpose
on 21.09.2024.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/E-Court (Shahdara)
KKD/Delhi/20.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
27.04.2024
Present : Complainant in person with Ld. counsel Sh. J.P. Singh.
All accused present on bail with Ld. Counsels
Sh. Satyendra Mishra and Sh. Salman Saifi.
Sh. Parmod Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
Today, this complaint case is fixed for arguments on
the point of charge.
Part arguments heard.
Put up this matter for further arguments on the point of
charge on 20.07.2024.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/Spl. Judge: SC/ST
(POA) Act/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/27.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
16.03.2024
Present : Complainant in person.
All accused present on bail with Ld. Counsel
Sh. Satyendra Mishra and Sh. Sundar Bansal. Fresh
v/n filed. Same is taken on record.
Sh. Parmod Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
Today, this complaint case is fixed for arguments on
the point of charge.
However, adjournment has been sought by
complainant as her counsel is not available today being unwell.
Accordingly, put up this matter for arguments on the
point of charge on 27.04.2024.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/Spl. Judge: SC/ST
(POA) Act/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/16.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
18.11.2023
Present : Complainant in person.
All accused present on bail with Ld. Counsel
Sh. Satender Mishra.
Sh. Parmod Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
Today, this complaint case is fixed for pre-charge
evidence.
However, fresh vakalatnama has been filed on behalf
of all accused persons today. Same is taken on record. Adjournment
has been sought by the Ld. Counsel for accused persons.
Ld. Counsel for complainant is also not present at this
stage.
Accordingly, put up this matter for purpose fixed on
27.01.2024.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/Spl. Judge: SC/ST
(POA) Act/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/18.11.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Ct. Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and Ors.
19.05.2023
Present : Complainant in person.
All accused present on bail with Ld. Counsel
Sh. Saurabh Tyagi.
Today this matter is fixed for pre-charge evidence.
However, complainant has sought sometime as the
main counsel is not present today. Adjournment is granted in the
interest of justice.
Put up this matter for purpose fixed on 26.08.2023.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/E-Court (Shahdara)
KKD/Delhi/19.05.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1
CT Case No. 07/2023
Rakesh Devi Vs. Raju and ors.
06.03.2023
Present : None for complainant.
Accused Parveen @ Monu and Dhanush Pal present
on bail.
Accused Raju present with Ld. Counsel (Fresh v/n
filed. Same is taken on record).
Sh. Vikas Kumar, Ld. Addl. PP for State.
This complaint case is fixed for filing of proper bail
application on behalf of accused Raju.
In compliance of the last order, bail application u/s
439 Cr. PC has been filed by the said accused supported by an
affidavit. Copy has been supplied to the State.
Issue notice to the complainant for NDOH.
Put up this matter for consideration on regular bail
application of accused Raju / FP on 15.03.2023. Interim order to
continue till NDOH.
(Vineet Kumar)
ASJ-02/Spl. Judge: SC/ST
(POA) Act/E-Court/Shahdara
KKD/Delhi/06.03.2023
-- 1 of 1 --