Full Order Text
Interim Order 8 · 23 Jul 2024 · CNR DLSH010009052024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 11CS (COMM)100/24 M/S RYSA INFRATECH PVT. LTD. VS. THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUNE ZONE ANDANR 23.07.2024 Present: Sh. D.P. Rana along with Ms. Bharti, and Harendra Kumar, Sh. Gaurav Rana Ld. Proxy Counsels for the plaintiff. Ms. Ruby along with Sh. Subhash Kumar Anand, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1. Sh. Arjun D. Singh, Sh. Yimyanger LongKumer, Ld. Counsels for the defendant no. 2 along with Sh. R.K. Aggarwal (AR of the defendant no. 2). The matter is fixed for filing the reply/arguments on the application under order 7 Rule 10 and 11 of CPC, filed by the defendant no. 2 on dated 01.07.2024, the counsel for the plaintiff had filed their reply to the said application. Copy thereof has already been sent to the counsel for the defendant no. 2. Today, the Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 2 has given the statement for seeking permission to withdraw the said application as due to some inadvertence, Rule 10 of Order 7 was also mentioned therein. He has also submitted that he has already filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC through online mode and he is filing the hard-copies of the application and some annexures which are already there on the record. In view of the statement of the Ld. Couonsel for the defendant no. 2 recorded in the court, the application filed by the defndant no. 2 under order 7 Rule 10 & 11 of CPC is dismissed as withdrawn. Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 2 has also filed hard copies of the application under Order 7 rule 11 of CPC along with annexures running into 15 pages. Copies thereof have been supplied to Ld. proxy -- 1 of 2 -- -2- Counsels for the plaintiff, who seek adjournment to file reply to the said application. Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1 has submitted that defendant no. 1 had also filed an application under Order 7 Rule 10 & 11 of CPC R/w Section 1 Rule 10 (2) r/w Section 151 of CPC. But, reply to the said application has not been filed by the plaintiff. Ld. Proxy counsels for the plaintiff seek adjournment to file reply to the said application. Accordingly, matter stands adjourned for filing replies to the said applications of the defendants and also for hearing arguments thereon. Plaintiff is directed to file replies to the said applications at least 02 prior to the next date of hearing in the court and to supply advance copies thereof to the defendants or their counsels. To come up on 21.08.2024. (Pawan Kumar Matto) District Judge, Commercial Court-04 Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts Delhi/23.07.2024 -- 2 of 2 --
