Order 11

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 20 CS 57/23
MOHD. RAFIQUE Vs. ARIF AND ORS
08.10.2025
Present:- Sh. Salim Malik, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff with plaintiff.
None for D1 to D5 (Ex-parte vide order dated 12.07.2023).
Sh.Vinay Rathi, Ld. Counsel for proposed defendant/DUSIB
through VC.
Today, matter is listed for arguments on the application under Order
1 Rule 10 CPC, filed by plaintiff.
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the proposed defendant, upon
instructions, fairly submits that he does not have any objection to the aforesaid
application and the same may be allowed as the DUSIB is the necessary party
to the suit.
Submissions heard. Record perused.
In view of the aforesaid submissions made by Ld. Counsels for the
parties as well as for the reasons mentioned in the application, this court is of
the view that the proposed defendant, being a necessary party, should be
impleaded in the suit to ensure a comprehensive adjudication of the issues
involved. Further, as no objection has been given by the Ld. Counsel for
proposed defendant, the impleadment of proposed defendant does not
prejudice any of the party, therefore, the aforesaid application is disposed off
as allowed. Proposed defendant/DUSIB is added in the array of defendants as
defendant no. 6.
Amended memo of parties is taken on record.
Plaintiff is directed to supply the complete paper book to D6 within
two days against proper receipt. Upon receipt, WS be filed within stipulated
period with an advance copy to the opposite party.
Matter is adjourned.
Put up for further proceedings on 11.02.2026.
(Gaurav)
District Judge-01/ SHD
KKD/Delhi/08.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --