Full Order Text
Order 11 · 29 Apr 2026 · CNR DLNW030028642023
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 32CS SCJ1406/23AIMLAY FOUNDATION Vs. LALIT NAILWAL 29.04.2026 Present : Sh. Mohit Kaushik, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Vide this order, the Court shall dispose off an application seeking leave to defend filed on behalf of defendant. By virtue of present application, the defendant is seeking leave of this court to defend the present suit. It is stated that summons for judgement have been served upon defendant on 04.01.2025. It is further stated that plaintiff had sought recovery of Rs. 1,74,268/- against the defendant under the summary procedure prescribed under Order XXXVII CPC and plaintiff has not placed the right and proper facts before the Court and the entire suit is based on false, frivolous and vaxatious allegations without cause of action. Defendant joined the plaintiff’s company on 02.08.2023 as Operational Manager and continued the job with full dedication till 12.08.2023 and on 13.08.2023 defendant took leave due to illness of his mother and next day for urgent reasons defendant had to go out of station and after coming home he fell ill due to Pancreatic infection and above all facts were communicated to his reporting head Ms. Surbhi Jain and also gave assurance that as and when he becomes fit for his job he shall join his duty. In the meantime, plaintiff had fired him from the job through e-mail. Defendant returned all the assets of plaintiff i.e. mobile device, a concurrently active Airtel SIM Card, a set of earphones through field boy of plaintiff’s company namely Mr. Mahesh who came to his home for collecting the same in September 2023. Plaintiff’s company had breached the appointment letter condition and defendant has suffered monetary loss. Hence, the defendant is entitled to leave to defend the present suit unconditionally. Reply on behalf of plaintiff is filed wherein it is stated that the -- 1 of 3 -- -2- application is liable to be dismissed as defendant has failed to disclose any triable issue and the present application has been filed on false, frivolous, baseless and concocted facts and the same is not maintainable. I have heard the submissions made on behalf of parties and perused the record. Perusal of the record shows that after service of summons for appearance, the defendant has filed his appearance pursuant to which summons for judgment was filed by the plaintiff. Thereafter the present application was filed by the defendant seeking leave to defend to contest the present suit. From the averments made in the application for leave to defend and its reply thereof and from the submissions of the Ld. counsels, it appears that the main issue in dispute between the parties is with respect to the conditions of appointment letter dated 02.08.2023 with respect to the relations of employee and employer. It is the case of the plaintiff that the defendant had not comply the terms and conditions letter dated 02.08.2023 and did not hand over the mobile devices, SIM etc and remained absence from his duties without prior notice. On the contrary, the case of defendant is that on 13.08.2023 defendant took leave due to illness of his mother and next day for urgent reasons defendant had to go out of station and after coming home he fell ill due to Pancreatic infection and above all facts were communicated to his reporting head Ms. Surbhi Jain and also gave assurance that as and when he becomes fit for his job he shall join his duty. In the meantime, plaintiff had fired him from the job through e-mail. Defendant returned all the assets of plaintiff i.e. mobile device, a concurrently active Airtel SIM Card, a set of earphones through field boy of plaintiff’s company namely Mr. Mahesh who came to his home for collecting the same in September 2023. In the opinion of this Court, the defendant has raised a triable issue which can be decided only after the -- 2 of 3 -- -3- evidences are led by the parties. The issues raised by the defendant regarding the prior intimation of leave and handing over of mobile devices etc. to one Mr. Mahesh, employee of plaintiff, requires that the parties be given opportunity to adduce their evidence in order to prove their respective claims. In view of the aforesaid and in the interest of justice, the application of defendant stands allowed unconditionally. Defendant is directed to file his written statement within fifteen days with direction to supply copy of the same to the opposite party against due acknowledgement. Accordingly the application stands disposed off. Put up for completion of pleadings, A/D of documents and framing of issues on 13.08.2026. (GITA) ACJ/CCJ/ARC (North-West) Rohini Courts, Delhi/29.04.2026 -- 3 of 3 --
