RUKMANI DEVIVsSMT JYOTI

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 36 CS SCJ 1706/24
Rukmani Devi Vs. Smt Jyoti
02.09.2026
Present: Sh. Atul Kumar, Proxy counsel for plaintiff along with plaintiff.
Sh. Amarjeet Singh, Proxy counsel for defendant along with defendant.
Pleadings of the parties are complete. No document for admission/denial is
insisted upon. No useful purpose shall be served by referring the parties to ADR.
From the pleadings of the parties following issues are framed:
1.
Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of permanent injunction
thereby restraining the defendant from interfering in the peaceful
possession of the plaintiff qua the suit property, as prayed for? (OPP)
2.
Whether the plaintiff has not approached to this court with clean hands?
OPD.
3.
Relief.
No other issue arises or is pressed for. Put up for PE on 23.12.2026.
Advance copy of the affidavit be supplied to the opposite party 7 days prior to the next
date of hearing. List of witnesses be filed within 15 days from today.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge/N-W District
02.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 36 CS SCJ 1706/24
Rukmani Devi Vs. Smt Jyoti
02.09.2026
Present: Sh. Atul Kumar, Proxy counsel for plaintiff along with plaintiff.
Sh. Amarjeet Singh, Proxy counsel for defendant along with defendant.
Pleadings of the parties are complete. No document for admission/denial is
insisted upon. No useful purpose shall be served by referring the parties to ADR.
From the pleadings of the parties following issues are framed:
1.
Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of permanent injunction
thereby restraining the defendant from interfering in the peaceful
possession of the plaintiff qua the suit property, as prayed for? (OPP)
2.
Whether the plaintiff has not approached to this court with clean hands?
OPD.
3.
Relief.
No other issue arises or is pressed for. Put up for PE on 23.12.2026.
Advance copy of the affidavit be supplied to the opposite party 7 days prior to the next
date of hearing. List of witnesses be filed within 15 days from today.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge/N-W District
02.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 27 CS SCJ 1706/24
Rukmani Devi Vs. Smt Jyoti
01.07.2026
Present: Dr. V.P. Singh, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Anil Dagar, Ld. Counsel for defendants.
Cost has been deposited. Receipt produced. Be taken on
record.
Arguments heard on the application u/o XXXIX Rule 1 and 2
CPC.
Vide separate order, the application u/o XXXIX Rule 1 and 2
CPC has been dismissed.
Put up for completion of pleading/framing of issues on
02.09.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-01.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 27 CS SCJ 1706/24
Rukmani Devi Vs. Smt Jyoti
01.07.2026
Present: Dr. V.P. Singh, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Anil Dagar, Ld. Counsel for defendants.
Cost has been deposited. Receipt produced. Be taken on
record.
Arguments heard on the application u/o XXXIX Rule 1 and 2
CPC.
Vide separate order, the application u/o XXXIX Rule 1 and 2
CPC has been dismissed.
Put up for completion of pleading/framing of issues on
02.09.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-01.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 31 CS SCJ 1706/24
Rukmani Devi Vs. Smt Jyoti
14.01.2026
Present: Sh. Mohit, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff with plaintiff.
Sh. Anil Dagar, Ld. Counsel for defendants.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that he does not wish to
file any reply to the application seeking condonation of delay and he will
address arguments.
Arguments heard on the application.
Ld. Counsel for applicant/defendant submits that the
defendant was not in possession of relevant documents and it took time
to arrange for the same. He further submits that the counsel for
defendant was unwell hence, there was a delay in filing of WS.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has opposed the application stating
that delay should not be condoned as the same is not explained .
Arguments heard. Record perused. Considering the
submissions of the defendant/applicant the application stands allowed
subject to cost of Rs. 2000/- to be deposited in the Advocates Welfare
Fund.
WS is taken on record.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has filed replication. Be taken on
record. Copy supplied.
Be put up for arguments on application under order 39 rule
1 and 2 CPC on 25.03.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-14.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 31 CS SCJ 1706/24
Rukmani Devi Vs. Smt Jyoti
14.01.2026
Present: Sh. Mohit, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff with plaintiff.
Sh. Anil Dagar, Ld. Counsel for defendants.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that he does not wish to
file any reply to the application seeking condonation of delay and he will
address arguments.
Arguments heard on the application.
Ld. Counsel for applicant/defendant submits that the
defendant was not in possession of relevant documents and it took time
to arrange for the same. He further submits that the counsel for
defendant was unwell hence, there was a delay in filing of WS.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has opposed the application stating
that delay should not be condoned as the same is not explained .
Arguments heard. Record perused. Considering the
submissions of the defendant/applicant the application stands allowed
subject to cost of Rs. 2000/- to be deposited in the Advocates Welfare
Fund.
WS is taken on record.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has filed replication. Be taken on
record. Copy supplied.
Be put up for arguments on application under order 39 rule
1 and 2 CPC on 25.03.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-14.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 1706/24 Rukmani Devi Vs. Smt Jyoti
09.06.2025
Present: Sh. Dharam Singh Gautam, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Anil Dagar, Ld. Counsel for all defendants.
Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings.
In between the dates of hearing WS has been filed on behalf
of the defendants alongwith an application for condonation of delay.
Copy supplied to the ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that he would file reply to
the application for condontion of delay. Time granted till NDOH.
List the matter for reply and arguments on the application for
condonation of delay on 17.09.2025.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts/09.06.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 1706/24 Rukmani Devi Vs. Smt Jyoti
09.06.2025
Present: Sh. Dharam Singh Gautam, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Anil Dagar, Ld. Counsel for all defendants.
Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings.
In between the dates of hearing WS has been filed on behalf
of the defendants alongwith an application for condonation of delay.
Copy supplied to the ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that he would file reply to
the application for condontion of delay. Time granted till NDOH.
List the matter for reply and arguments on the application for
condonation of delay on 17.09.2025.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts/09.06.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 17 CS SCJ 1706/24
Rukmani Devi Vs. Smt Jyoti
22.03.2025
Present: Dr. V.P. Singh and Sh. Atul Kumar, Ld. Counsels for
plaintiff alongwith plaintiff.
Sh. Hemant Pathak, Ld. Counsel for defendants alongwith
defendant no.1.
Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendants. Same be taken
on record.
Ld. Counsel for defendants submits that he will file the WS
alongwith appropriate application.
List the matter for completion of pleadings on 09.06.2025.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts/22.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 17 CS SCJ 1706/24
Rukmani Devi Vs. Smt Jyoti
22.03.2025
Present: Dr. V.P. Singh and Sh. Atul Kumar, Ld. Counsels for
plaintiff alongwith plaintiff.
Sh. Hemant Pathak, Ld. Counsel for defendants alongwith
defendant no.1.
Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendants. Same be taken
on record.
Ld. Counsel for defendants submits that he will file the WS
alongwith appropriate application.
List the matter for completion of pleadings on 09.06.2025.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts/22.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 20 CS SCJ 1706/24 Rukmani Devi Vs. Smt Jyoti
21.12.2024
Fresh suit received by way of assignemnt. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Atul Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Heard. Record perused.
Issue summons to the defendant for settlement of issues and
notice of the application u/o 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC on filing of
PF/RC/Speed Post returnable on 22.03.2025.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts/21.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 20 CS SCJ 1706/24 Rukmani Devi Vs. Smt Jyoti
21.12.2024
Fresh suit received by way of assignemnt. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Atul Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Heard. Record perused.
Issue summons to the defendant for settlement of issues and
notice of the application u/o 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC on filing of
PF/RC/Speed Post returnable on 22.03.2025.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts/21.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --