Skip to main content
CS SCJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR CIVIL JUDGE

NARENDER LUTHRAVsKALPANA LUTHRA

CNR DLNW030019772025582-Civil Judge
Rohini North-West, Senior Civil Judge cum RC Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 21 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
1317/2025
Registration Date
10 Nov 2025
Next Hearing Date
09 Dec 2026
Case Stage
Misc. Argument

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1NARENDER LUTHRA

    Respondent

    1. 1KALPANA LUTHRA

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Injuctions-Both Permanent and Mandatory · Sec 1

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 11-11-2025
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
Next Hearing Date: 08-12-2025

Date: 08-12-2025
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
Next Hearing Date: 25-02-2026

Date: 25-02-2026
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
Next Hearing Date: 29-04-2026

Date: 29-04-2026
Business: further proceedings
Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
Next Hearing Date: 22-07-2026

Date: 22-07-2026
Business: adjourned for fp
Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance
Next Hearing Date: 30-09-2026

Date: 30-09-2026
Business: fp
Next Purpose: Misc. Argument
Next Hearing Date: 09-12-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 1992/2025
Filing Date: 07-11-2025
eFiling Number: ADL20230000255C202500093
eFiling Date: 07-11-2025
First Hearing Date: 11th November 2025
Court Number And Judge: 582-Civil Judge

    Orders

    10
    Interim Order 5
    30 Sept 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 22 CS SCJ 1317/25
NARENDER LUTHRA Vs. KALPANA LUTHRA
30.09.2026
Present: Sh. Arun Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Mohd. Azhar and Sh. Amit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for
defendant no.1 through VC.
Defendant no. 2 and 3 are Ex-parte.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that no settlement could
be arrived.
Today WS has been filed on behalf of defendant no. 1. The
same is accompanied with the application seeking condonation of delay.
Further an application under order 7 rule 11 CPC has been filed.
Let reply to these applications be filed with advance copy to
the opposite party.
Be put up for arguments on both the applications and on
order application u/o 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC on 09.12.2026.
Both the parties are directed to maintain a status quo qua
the suit property till the NDOH.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge/N-W District
30.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 4
    22 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14 CS SCJ 1317/25
NARENDER LUTHRA Vs. KALPANA LUTHRA
22.07.2026
Present: Sh.Arun Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Mhd. Azhar and Sh. Amit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for
defendant no.1 along with defendant.
An application under order 7 rule 11 CPC has been filed by
the defendant no. 1. Be taken on record. Copy supplied.
Ld counsel for plaintiff submits that no WS has been filed
by the defendant despite service being effected in January 2026. He
prays that right to file WS be closed.
Perusal reveals that appearance has only been entered on
behalf of defendant no. 1 and none has appeared for defendant no. 2 and
3.
Accordingly, defendant no. 2 and 3 are being proceeded ex
parte. Their defence if any is struck off.
Both the parties submit that they are exploring possibility of
settlement.
Considering the submissions, adverse order against
defendant no. 1 is deferred till the NDOH.
Be put up for verification of settlement/completion
pleadings on 30.09.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge/N-W District
22.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 3
    29 Apr 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 CS SCJ 1317/25
NARENDER LUTHRA Vs. KALPANA LUTHRA
29.04.2026
Present: Sh. Arun Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along
with plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC.
No WS has been filed.
Ld. Counsel for defendant submits that there is a
possibility of settlement and seeks some time to file WS.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has objected stating that the
statutory period for filing of WS has elapsed. However, he
submits that the parties are exploring possibility of settlement.
Submissions heard.
Be put up for completion of pleadings for
22.07.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-29.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    25 Feb 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 CS SCJ 1317/25
NARENDER LUTHRA Vs. KALPANA LUTHRA
25.02.2026
Present: Sh. Arun Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Mohd. Asgar, Ld. Counsel for all the defendants.
Ld. Counsel for defendants seeks some time to file WS.
Memo of appearance has been filed by the defendants . Same be taken
on record.
Let the WS be filed within stipulated time with advance
copy to the opposite party.
Be put up for completion of pleadings for 29.04.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-25.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    08 Dec 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 13 CS SCJ 1317/25 NARENDER LUTHRA Vs. KALPANA LUTHRA
08.12.2025
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered.
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Heard. Record perused.
Issue summons to the defendants by ordinary process as well as through
Post/Speed post/registered courier on filing of PF within three days, returnable on
25.02.2026.
Summons be also issued through all permissible electronic modes.
Plaintiff is directed to file affidavit with regard to mobile no. and email
address of the defendant along with certificate u/s 65 B of Indian Evidence Act.
The process server is directed to file a report of three mandatory visits and
the summons served by way of affixation in case of non-availability/refusal of
defendants.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-08.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 5
    30 Sept 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 22 CS SCJ 1317/25
NARENDER LUTHRA Vs. KALPANA LUTHRA
30.09.2026
Present: Sh. Arun Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Mohd. Azhar and Sh. Amit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for
defendant no.1 through VC.
Defendant no. 2 and 3 are Ex-parte.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that no settlement could
be arrived.
Today WS has been filed on behalf of defendant no. 1. The
same is accompanied with the application seeking condonation of delay.
Further an application under order 7 rule 11 CPC has been filed.
Let reply to these applications be filed with advance copy to
the opposite party.
Be put up for arguments on both the applications and on
order application u/o 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC on 09.12.2026.
Both the parties are directed to maintain a status quo qua
the suit property till the NDOH.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge/N-W District
30.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 4
    22 Jul 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14 CS SCJ 1317/25
NARENDER LUTHRA Vs. KALPANA LUTHRA
22.07.2026
Present: Sh.Arun Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Mhd. Azhar and Sh. Amit Kumar, Ld. Counsel for
defendant no.1 along with defendant.
An application under order 7 rule 11 CPC has been filed by
the defendant no. 1. Be taken on record. Copy supplied.
Ld counsel for plaintiff submits that no WS has been filed
by the defendant despite service being effected in January 2026. He
prays that right to file WS be closed.
Perusal reveals that appearance has only been entered on
behalf of defendant no. 1 and none has appeared for defendant no. 2 and
3.
Accordingly, defendant no. 2 and 3 are being proceeded ex
parte. Their defence if any is struck off.
Both the parties submit that they are exploring possibility of
settlement.
Considering the submissions, adverse order against
defendant no. 1 is deferred till the NDOH.
Be put up for verification of settlement/completion
pleadings on 30.09.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge/N-W District
22.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3
    29 Apr 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 CS SCJ 1317/25
NARENDER LUTHRA Vs. KALPANA LUTHRA
29.04.2026
Present: Sh. Arun Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along
with plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC.
No WS has been filed.
Ld. Counsel for defendant submits that there is a
possibility of settlement and seeks some time to file WS.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has objected stating that the
statutory period for filing of WS has elapsed. However, he
submits that the parties are exploring possibility of settlement.
Submissions heard.
Be put up for completion of pleadings for
22.07.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-29.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    25 Feb 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 CS SCJ 1317/25
NARENDER LUTHRA Vs. KALPANA LUTHRA
25.02.2026
Present: Sh. Arun Kumar, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Mohd. Asgar, Ld. Counsel for all the defendants.
Ld. Counsel for defendants seeks some time to file WS.
Memo of appearance has been filed by the defendants . Same be taken
on record.
Let the WS be filed within stipulated time with advance
copy to the opposite party.
Be put up for completion of pleadings for 29.04.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-25.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    08 Dec 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 13 CS SCJ 1317/25 NARENDER LUTHRA Vs. KALPANA LUTHRA
08.12.2025
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered.
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Heard. Record perused.
Issue summons to the defendants by ordinary process as well as through
Post/Speed post/registered courier on filing of PF within three days, returnable on
25.02.2026.
Summons be also issued through all permissible electronic modes.
Plaintiff is directed to file affidavit with regard to mobile no. and email
address of the defendant along with certificate u/s 65 B of Indian Evidence Act.
The process server is directed to file a report of three mandatory visits and
the summons served by way of affixation in case of non-availability/refusal of
defendants.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-08.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.