Full Order Text
Order 4 · 20 May 2025 · CNR DLNW030016952024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 10 CS SCJ 1106/24 SHAILANDAR Vs. SANJAY PANDEY 20.05.2025 Present : Sh. Mithilesh Kumar Yadav, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff. An application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC was filed on behalf of plaintiff on the last date of hearing. It is submitted by counsel for the plaintiff that inadvertently in the plaint, the name of the defendant has wrongly been mentioned as Sanjay Pandey instead of Sanju Pandey and it has been mentioned that the defendant is the son of Ajay Pandey whereas she is the wife of Ajay Pandey. It is therefore prayed that permission be granted to correct the abovesaid mistakes in the plaint. Submissions heard on the application for amendment under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. Record perused. Considering the submissions and material on record and the fact that the matter is at the initial stage and the amendment as sought do not change the nature of the suit the application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC stands allowed. Amended plaint alongwith amended memo of parties taken on record. Application stands disposed off. At request, issue fresh summons for settlement of issue to the defendant as per the amended memo of parties through all permissible modes including electronic mode on filing of PF within seven days, returnable for 14.10.2025. Steps be taken within one week from today. (Mansi Malik) ACJ/ARC (North-West) Rohini Courts, Delhi/20.05.2025 -- 1 of 1 --