TrustJury record updated 21 Oct 2026
Not available
Date: 26-07-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 24-08-2024 Date: 24-08-2024 Business: adjourned for fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 19-11-2024 Date: 19-11-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 21-12-2024 Date: 21-12-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 24-03-2025 Date: 24-03-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. Argument Next Hearing Date: 08-07-2025 Date: 08-07-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. Argument Next Hearing Date: 28-10-2025 Date: 28-10-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. Argument Next Hearing Date: 09-02-2026 Date: 09-02-2026 Date: 22-04-2026 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Order on Application Next Hearing Date: 08-06-2026 Date: 08-06-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Order on Application Next Hearing Date: 11-08-2026 Date: 11-08-2026 Business: dimissed Next Purpose: Issues Next Hearing Date: 29-10-2026
Filing Number: 1466/2024 Filing Date: 24-07-2024 eFiling Number: ADL20230004232C202400011 eFiling Date: 23-07-2024 First Hearing Date: 26th July 2024 Court Number And Judge: 582-Civil Judge
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 1 44 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 11.08.2026 Argued by: Sh. R.S. Lathwal, Sh. Amit Mittal and Sh. Ajay, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh.Vijay Prajapati, Ld. Counsel for both the defendants alongwith defendant no. 1. ORDER 1. Vide this order I shall dispose off the application u/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs are co-bhumidar having 1/3rd share each…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 36 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 08.06.2026 Present: Sh. R.S. Lathwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Defendant in person. Clarifications required. Be put up for 11.08.2026. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge/N-W District 08.06.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 32 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 22.04.2026 Present: Sh. R.S. Lathwal and Sh. Ajay, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Abhishek Sharma, Chetan Chahar and Sh. Yash Tokas, Ld. Counsel for defendant. Arguments heard on the application under order 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC. Be put up for clarifications/orders for 08.06.2026. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-22.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 1 32 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 09.02.2026 Present: Sh. R.S Lathwal, Ld. Counsel for all plaintiffs. Sh. Chetan Chahar, Ld. Counsel for defendant along with defendant. Arguments heard on the application u/o 1 rule 10 filed by the defendants seeking deletion of plaintiff no. 2 and3 for the array of parties. Ld. Counsel for applicant/defendant has argued that the plaintiff no. 2 and 3 have not specified…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 28.10.2025 Present: Sh. RS Lathwal, Sh. Amit Mittal, Ld. Counsels for plaintiffs. Sh. Vijay Prajapati, Ld. Counsel for defendants (through VC). Sh. Abhishek Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant. Matter is at the stage of reply/arguments on the application under order 1 rule 10 CPC filed on behalf of the defendants. Today, reply has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff no. 2 and 3. Same be taken on record. Copy already supplied. At joint request, the matter stands adjourned. List the matter for arguments on the application under order 1 rule 10 CPC on 09.02.2026. (Arjun Kirar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-28.10.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 24 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 08.07.2025 Present: Sh. R.S. Lathwal and Sh. Ajay , Ld. Counsels for plaintiff. Sh. Abhishek Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendants. Matter is at the stage of reply/arguments on the application under order 1 rule 10 CPC. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that inadvertently he could not file reply to the said application. However, he is ready to argue the same. Both the parties are directed to appear at 02:45 pm. For advancing the arguments as time period before that has already been assigned to evidences and arguments in other matters. Both the counsels submits that they have urgent matter before other court and will not be available at the said time period and have requested for an adjournment. Adjournment granted. Plaintiff is directed to file reply to the abovesaid application on the NDOH with advance copy to the opposite party. List the matter for abovesaid purpose on 28.10.2025. (Arjun Kirar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts/08.07.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 9 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 24.03.2025 Present: Sh. R.S. Lathwal and Sh. Amit Mittal, Ld. Counsels for plaintiffs. Sh. Vijay Prajapati, Ld. Counsel for defendants. Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings. Today, replication has been filed on behalf of plaintiff to the WS of the defendants. Same be taken on record. Copy supplied to the opposite party. Today, an application u/O 1 Rule 10 CPC has been moved on behalf of defendants. Same be taken on record. Copy supplied to the opposite party. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff seeks time to file reply to the same. Let the same be filed on or before the NDOH with advance copy to the opposite party at least 15 days prior to the NDOH. Previous cost of Rs.2000/- paid by Ld. Counsel for defendant to the Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. List the matter for reply/arguments on the abovesaid application on 08.07.2025. (Arjun Kirar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts/24.03.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 15 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 21.12.2024 Present: Plaintiff in person. Sh. R.S. Lathwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Vijay Prajapati, Ld. Counsel for defendants. In between the dates of hearing, an application for condonation of delay has been filed on behalf of the defendants. Same be taken on record. Copy supplied to the opposite party. Today reply has been filed by ld. Counsel for the plaintiff to the application for condonation of delay. Same be taken on record. Arguments heard on behalf of both the parties on the application for condonation of delay. Record perused. This court is of the opinion that in an adversarial trial, no party should ordinarily be denied right to participate in justice deliverry system. In the present case the defendant has sufficiently explained the delay due to which he could not file the WS on time. In view of the same, the delay in filing the WS stands condoned subject to cost of Rs.2000/- to be paid on the NDOH to the plaintiff. List the matter for completion of pleadings, filing replication on 24.03.2025. (Arjun Kirar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts/21.12.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 14 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 19.11.2024. Present: Sh. R. S Lathwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Ravi, Ld. Counsel for defendant alongwith defendant. Today Ld. Counsel for defendant has filed WS and reply to the application u/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has taken the objection that the WS has not been filed within the limitation period. Ld. Counsel for defendant seeks one week time to move the application for condonation of delay. List the matter for further proceedings on 21.12.2024. (Arjun Kirar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-19.11.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 21 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 24.08.2024 Present: Sh. R. S Lathwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. None for the defendants despite service on 06.08.2024. WS has not been filed on behalf of the defendants. Be filed within the time prescribed by law. Now to come up for completion of pleadings/admission- denial of documents/framing of issues on 19.11.2024. At this stage, Sh. Sachin Dabas, Ld. Counsel for the defendant appeared. Fresh Vakalatnama filed. Same is taken on record. He has been apprised of the order and NDOH. (Shaina Goyal) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-24.08.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No. 972/2024 CHARAN SINGH & ORS. VS. RAJ SINGH MANN & ANR. 26.07.2024 Fresh suit for permanent injunction received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: Sh. R. S Lathwal and Sh. Amit Mittal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Heard. Record perused. Issue summons for settlement of issues and notice of application u/o XXXIX rule 1 & 2 CPC to the defendant on filing of PF & RC within one week returnable for 24.08.2024. (Shaina Goyal) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-26.07.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 1 44 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 11.08.2026 Argued by: Sh. R.S. Lathwal, Sh. Amit Mittal and Sh. Ajay, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh.Vijay Prajapati, Ld. Counsel for both the defendants alongwith defendant no. 1. ORDER 1. Vide this order I shall dispose off the application u/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs are co-bhumidar having 1/3rd share each…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 36 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 08.06.2026 Present: Sh. R.S. Lathwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Defendant in person. Clarifications required. Be put up for 11.08.2026. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge/N-W District 08.06.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 32 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 22.04.2026 Present: Sh. R.S. Lathwal and Sh. Ajay, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Abhishek Sharma, Chetan Chahar and Sh. Yash Tokas, Ld. Counsel for defendant. Arguments heard on the application under order 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC. Be put up for clarifications/orders for 08.06.2026. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-22.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 1 32 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 09.02.2026 Present: Sh. R.S Lathwal, Ld. Counsel for all plaintiffs. Sh. Chetan Chahar, Ld. Counsel for defendant along with defendant. Arguments heard on the application u/o 1 rule 10 filed by the defendants seeking deletion of plaintiff no. 2 and3 for the array of parties. Ld. Counsel for applicant/defendant has argued that the plaintiff no. 2 and 3 have not specified…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 28.10.2025 Present: Sh. RS Lathwal, Sh. Amit Mittal, Ld. Counsels for plaintiffs. Sh. Vijay Prajapati, Ld. Counsel for defendants (through VC). Sh. Abhishek Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant. Matter is at the stage of reply/arguments on the application under order 1 rule 10 CPC filed on behalf of the defendants. Today, reply has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff no. 2 and 3. Same be taken on record. Copy already supplied. At joint request, the matter stands adjourned. List the matter for arguments on the application under order 1 rule 10 CPC on 09.02.2026. (Arjun Kirar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-28.10.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 24 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 08.07.2025 Present: Sh. R.S. Lathwal and Sh. Ajay , Ld. Counsels for plaintiff. Sh. Abhishek Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the defendants. Matter is at the stage of reply/arguments on the application under order 1 rule 10 CPC. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that inadvertently he could not file reply to the said application. However, he is ready to argue the same. Both the parties are directed to appear at 02:45 pm. For advancing the arguments as time period before that has already been assigned to evidences and arguments in other matters. Both the counsels submits that they have urgent matter before other court and will not be available at the said time period and have requested for an adjournment. Adjournment granted. Plaintiff is directed to file reply to the abovesaid application on the NDOH with advance copy to the opposite party. List the matter for abovesaid purpose on 28.10.2025. (Arjun Kirar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts/08.07.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 9 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 24.03.2025 Present: Sh. R.S. Lathwal and Sh. Amit Mittal, Ld. Counsels for plaintiffs. Sh. Vijay Prajapati, Ld. Counsel for defendants. Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings. Today, replication has been filed on behalf of plaintiff to the WS of the defendants. Same be taken on record. Copy supplied to the opposite party. Today, an application u/O 1 Rule 10 CPC has been moved on behalf of defendants. Same be taken on record. Copy supplied to the opposite party. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff seeks time to file reply to the same. Let the same be filed on or before the NDOH with advance copy to the opposite party at least 15 days prior to the NDOH. Previous cost of Rs.2000/- paid by Ld. Counsel for defendant to the Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. List the matter for reply/arguments on the abovesaid application on 08.07.2025. (Arjun Kirar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts/24.03.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 15 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 21.12.2024 Present: Plaintiff in person. Sh. R.S. Lathwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Vijay Prajapati, Ld. Counsel for defendants. In between the dates of hearing, an application for condonation of delay has been filed on behalf of the defendants. Same be taken on record. Copy supplied to the opposite party. Today reply has been filed by ld. Counsel for the plaintiff to the application for condonation of delay. Same be taken on record. Arguments heard on behalf of both the parties on the application for condonation of delay. Record perused. This court is of the opinion that in an adversarial trial, no party should ordinarily be denied right to participate in justice deliverry system. In the present case the defendant has sufficiently explained the delay due to which he could not file the WS on time. In view of the same, the delay in filing the WS stands condoned subject to cost of Rs.2000/- to be paid on the NDOH to the plaintiff. List the matter for completion of pleadings, filing replication on 24.03.2025. (Arjun Kirar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts/21.12.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 14 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 19.11.2024. Present: Sh. R. S Lathwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Ravi, Ld. Counsel for defendant alongwith defendant. Today Ld. Counsel for defendant has filed WS and reply to the application u/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has taken the objection that the WS has not been filed within the limitation period. Ld. Counsel for defendant seeks one week time to move the application for condonation of delay. List the matter for further proceedings on 21.12.2024. (Arjun Kirar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-19.11.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 21 CS SCJ 972/24 Charan Singh Vs. Raj Singh Mann 24.08.2024 Present: Sh. R. S Lathwal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. None for the defendants despite service on 06.08.2024. WS has not been filed on behalf of the defendants. Be filed within the time prescribed by law. Now to come up for completion of pleadings/admission- denial of documents/framing of issues on 19.11.2024. At this stage, Sh. Sachin Dabas, Ld. Counsel for the defendant appeared. Fresh Vakalatnama filed. Same is taken on record. He has been apprised of the order and NDOH. (Shaina Goyal) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-24.08.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No. 972/2024 CHARAN SINGH & ORS. VS. RAJ SINGH MANN & ANR. 26.07.2024 Fresh suit for permanent injunction received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: Sh. R. S Lathwal and Sh. Amit Mittal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Heard. Record perused. Issue summons for settlement of issues and notice of application u/o XXXIX rule 1 & 2 CPC to the defendant on filing of PF & RC within one week returnable for 24.08.2024. (Shaina Goyal) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-26.07.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
