SAMINA BEGUMVsHOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH PEER

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 27 CS SCJ/898/2024
CNR No. DLNW03-0013642024
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH
PEER
19.08.2026
Present : Sh. Ram Kishan, Ld. LAC for plaintiff.
Be put up for orders during course of the day.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC (NW)/19.08.2026
At 04:00 pm
Present : None
No time left as judgment was passed in three cases
i.e. CS SCJ 1272/21, CS SCJ 876/24, CS SCJ 427/26 and one
miscellaneous order was passed today in CS SCJ 92/25.
Be put up for orders on 15.09.2026.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC (NW)/19.08.2026(m)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19 CS SCJ 898/24
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH
PEER
18.07.2026
Present : Sh. Ram Kishan, Ld. LAC for plaintiff.
Sh. Gaurav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is fixed today for arguments on application
u/o 7 rule 11 CPC.
Arguments heard.
Be put up for orders on 19.08.2026.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/18.07.2026(m)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 31 CS SCJ 898/24
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH
PEER
11.05.2026
Present : Sh. Ram Kishan, Ld. LAC for plaintiff.
Sh. Gaurav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is fixed today for arguments on application
u/o 7 rule 11 CPC.
At request, matter is passed over at 11:30 am.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC (NW)/11.05.2026
At 11:30 am
Present : As above
Part submissions heard on aforesaid application.
At the request of Ld. Counsel for defendant, matter
is adjourned for further arguments on application u/o 7 rule 11
CPC on 18.07.2026.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC (NW)/11.05.2026(m)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 CS SCJ 898/24
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH PEER
16.02.2026
Present : Sh. Ram Kishan, Ld. LAC for Plaintiff.
Sh. Gaurav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for Defendant.
Ld. Counsel for Defendant has submitted that he has moved
an application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC. Copy of which has already been supplied
to plaintiff.
Adjournment is requested on behalf of plaintiff for reply and
arguments on the said application.
Be put up for reply and arguments on aforesaid application on
11.05.2026. The date is given as per convenience of the parties. No
adjournment/exemption/passover shall be granted on the next date of
hearing.
Plaintiff is directed to supply 15 days advance copy of the
reply, if any to the opposite side.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/16.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 40 CS SCJ 898/24
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH PEER
08.12.2025
Present : Shri Ram Kishan, Ld. LAC for plaintiff.
Shri Gaurav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendants.
Ld. LAC for the plaintiff has moved an application for
adopting rejoinder and evidence led by the parties in the Court of ld.
District Judge.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant no.2 has moved an application
for proceeding ahead with the case from the stage where the suit was
returned.
It is noted that ld. Predecessor of this Court, vide order dated
30.10.2025, has clarified that case will start de-novo. Accordingly, the
aforesaid application of the defendant no.2. is dismissed being devoid of
merits.
Ld. Counsel for the defendants seeks adjournment for filing
reply to the aforesaid application filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
At request, matter is adjourned for reply/arguments on
aforesaid application of the plaintiff on 16.02.2026.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/08.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 38 CS SCJ 898/24
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH PEER
17.11.2025
Present : Sh. Ram Kishan, Ld. LAC for plaintiff.
Sh. Gaurav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for Defendant.
Counsel for both the sides have submitted that this court
should adopt the proceedings before the court of Ld. District Judge and
final arguments be heard, accordingly.
Both the parties have sought adjournment for moving separate
application in this regard alongwith relevant case law. Be put up on
08.12.2025 at 11:00 am. The date is given as per convenience of the
parties. No adjournment/exemption/passover shall be granted on the next
date of hearing.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/17.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 38 CS SCJ 898/24
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH PEER
17.11.2025
Present : Sh. Ram Kishan, Ld. LAC for plaintiff.
Sh. Gaurav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for Defendant.
Counsel for both the sides have submitted that this court
should adopt the proceedings before the court of Ld. District Judge and
final arguments be heard, accordingly.
Both the parties have sought adjournment for moving separate
application in this regard alongwith relevant case law. Be put up on
08.12.2025 at 11:00 am. The date is given as per convenience of the
parties. No adjournment/exemption/passover shall be granted on the next
date of hearing.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/17.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 13 CS SCJ 898/24
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH
PEER
07.07.2025
Present : Sh. Ram Kishan, Ld. LAC for plaintiff.
Sh. Gaurav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Arguments heard regarding the stage from which
proceedings shall commence in view of the judgment titled as
M/s EXL Careers & Anr. v. Frankfinn Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd.
Ld. LAC for plaintiff has filed aforesaid judgment in
support of his submissions.
Ld. Counsel for defendant also replied upon
judgment titled as
Jag Mohan Chawla v. Dera Radha Swami
Satsang & Ors.
Be listed for clarifications, if any/orders on
01.09.2025.
(Anuj Kumar Singh)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/07.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 898/24
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH
PEER
10.03.2025
Present : Sh. Pramod, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff with plaintiff.
Sh. Gaurav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
As per record, the plaint was returned to the plaintiff
vide order dated 06.06.2024 of Ld. Principal District & Sessions
Judge, North-West, Rohini Courts, Delhi.
Both the counsels have requested that the original
file be summoned from the said court.
However, in the case of
M/s EXL Careers v.
Frankfinn Aviation Services Private Limited (Civil Appeal no.
2904 of 2020 dated 05.08.2020), it was held by Hon’ble Apex
Court that if the plaint is returned under Order 7 Rule 10 and 10A
of the CPC for presentation in the court in which it should have
been instituted, the suit shall proceed denovo.
Both the counsels seek time to address the
arguments on the abovesaid aspect.
Re-notify on 07.07.2025.
(Priyanka Rajpoot)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/10.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 26 CS SCJ/898/2024
CNR No. DLNW03-0013642024
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH
PEER
15.09.2026
Present : Sh. Ram Kishan, Ld. LAC for plaintiff.
Sh. Gaurav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant
(through VC).
Clarification sought with regard to the non
availability of complete documents annexed with the plaint. It
has been apprised by Ld. LAC for plaintiff that earlier the suit
was filed before the court of Ld. District Judge. It is submitted
that plaint before the court of Ld. District Judge was returned.
Ld. LAC for plaintiff has submitted that the plaintiff
has not filed the plaint again and the record was transferred from
the court of Ld. District Judge to Ld. Principal District &
Sessions Judge, North West, Rohini Courts, Delhi.
Ahlmad is directed to file report regarding the
receiving of pleading in the present case on NDOH.
Be put up on 23.11.2026.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/15.09.2026(u)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 27 CS SCJ/898/2024
CNR No. DLNW03-0013642024
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH
PEER
19.08.2026
Present : Sh. Ram Kishan, Ld. LAC for plaintiff.
Be put up for orders during course of the day.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC (NW)/19.08.2026
At 04:00 pm
Present : None
No time left as judgment was passed in three cases
i.e. CS SCJ 1272/21, CS SCJ 876/24, CS SCJ 427/26 and one
miscellaneous order was passed today in CS SCJ 92/25.
Be put up for orders on 15.09.2026.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC (NW)/19.08.2026(m)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19 CS SCJ 898/24
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH
PEER
18.07.2026
Present : Sh. Ram Kishan, Ld. LAC for plaintiff.
Sh. Gaurav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is fixed today for arguments on application
u/o 7 rule 11 CPC.
Arguments heard.
Be put up for orders on 19.08.2026.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/18.07.2026(m)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 31 CS SCJ 898/24
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH
PEER
11.05.2026
Present : Sh. Ram Kishan, Ld. LAC for plaintiff.
Sh. Gaurav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is fixed today for arguments on application
u/o 7 rule 11 CPC.
At request, matter is passed over at 11:30 am.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC (NW)/11.05.2026
At 11:30 am
Present : As above
Part submissions heard on aforesaid application.
At the request of Ld. Counsel for defendant, matter
is adjourned for further arguments on application u/o 7 rule 11
CPC on 18.07.2026.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC (NW)/11.05.2026(m)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 CS SCJ 898/24
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH PEER
16.02.2026
Present : Sh. Ram Kishan, Ld. LAC for Plaintiff.
Sh. Gaurav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for Defendant.
Ld. Counsel for Defendant has submitted that he has moved
an application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC. Copy of which has already been supplied
to plaintiff.
Adjournment is requested on behalf of plaintiff for reply and
arguments on the said application.
Be put up for reply and arguments on aforesaid application on
11.05.2026. The date is given as per convenience of the parties. No
adjournment/exemption/passover shall be granted on the next date of
hearing.
Plaintiff is directed to supply 15 days advance copy of the
reply, if any to the opposite side.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/16.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 40 CS SCJ 898/24
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH PEER
08.12.2025
Present : Shri Ram Kishan, Ld. LAC for plaintiff.
Shri Gaurav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendants.
Ld. LAC for the plaintiff has moved an application for
adopting rejoinder and evidence led by the parties in the Court of ld.
District Judge.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant no.2 has moved an application
for proceeding ahead with the case from the stage where the suit was
returned.
It is noted that ld. Predecessor of this Court, vide order dated
30.10.2025, has clarified that case will start de-novo. Accordingly, the
aforesaid application of the defendant no.2. is dismissed being devoid of
merits.
Ld. Counsel for the defendants seeks adjournment for filing
reply to the aforesaid application filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
At request, matter is adjourned for reply/arguments on
aforesaid application of the plaintiff on 16.02.2026.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/08.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 38 CS SCJ 898/24
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH PEER
17.11.2025
Present : Sh. Ram Kishan, Ld. LAC for plaintiff.
Sh. Gaurav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for Defendant.
Counsel for both the sides have submitted that this court
should adopt the proceedings before the court of Ld. District Judge and
final arguments be heard, accordingly.
Both the parties have sought adjournment for moving separate
application in this regard alongwith relevant case law. Be put up on
08.12.2025 at 11:00 am. The date is given as per convenience of the
parties. No adjournment/exemption/passover shall be granted on the next
date of hearing.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/17.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 38 CS SCJ 898/24
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH PEER
17.11.2025
Present : Sh. Ram Kishan, Ld. LAC for plaintiff.
Sh. Gaurav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for Defendant.
Counsel for both the sides have submitted that this court
should adopt the proceedings before the court of Ld. District Judge and
final arguments be heard, accordingly.
Both the parties have sought adjournment for moving separate
application in this regard alongwith relevant case law. Be put up on
08.12.2025 at 11:00 am. The date is given as per convenience of the
parties. No adjournment/exemption/passover shall be granted on the next
date of hearing.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/17.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 13 CS SCJ 898/24
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH
PEER
07.07.2025
Present : Sh. Ram Kishan, Ld. LAC for plaintiff.
Sh. Gaurav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Arguments heard regarding the stage from which
proceedings shall commence in view of the judgment titled as
M/s EXL Careers & Anr. v. Frankfinn Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd.
Ld. LAC for plaintiff has filed aforesaid judgment in
support of his submissions.
Ld. Counsel for defendant also replied upon
judgment titled as
Jag Mohan Chawla v. Dera Radha Swami
Satsang & Ors.
Be listed for clarifications, if any/orders on
01.09.2025.
(Anuj Kumar Singh)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/07.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 898/24
SAMINA BEGUM Vs. HOLY SHRINE DARGAH PANCH
PEER
10.03.2025
Present : Sh. Pramod, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff with plaintiff.
Sh. Gaurav Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
As per record, the plaint was returned to the plaintiff
vide order dated 06.06.2024 of Ld. Principal District & Sessions
Judge, North-West, Rohini Courts, Delhi.
Both the counsels have requested that the original
file be summoned from the said court.
However, in the case of
M/s EXL Careers v.
Frankfinn Aviation Services Private Limited (Civil Appeal no.
2904 of 2020 dated 05.08.2020), it was held by Hon’ble Apex
Court that if the plaint is returned under Order 7 Rule 10 and 10A
of the CPC for presentation in the court in which it should have
been instituted, the suit shall proceed denovo.
Both the counsels seek time to address the
arguments on the abovesaid aspect.
Re-notify on 07.07.2025.
(Priyanka Rajpoot)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/10.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --