SAKEENAVsANEESH

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 886/24 Sakeena Vs. Aneesh
20.09.2025
Present: Sh. Amit Rao, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Jai Praksh Gautam and Sh. Santosh Kumar Singh Yadav, Ld. Counsel
for defendant.
Matter is at the stage of reply/arguments on the application u/o 12 Rule 6
CPC and application u/o 7 Rule 11 CPC.
Today, reply has been filed on behalf of the defendants to the application
u/o 12 Rule 6 CPC. Same be taken on record. Copy supplied.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that he does not want to file reply to the
application u/o 7 Rule 11 and would directly argue on the same.
Arguments heard on behalf of both the parties on the above said
applications.
List the matter for orders/clarification if any, on the above said applications
on 02.01.2026.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-20.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 886/24 Sakeena Vs. Aneesh
20.09.2025
Present: Sh. Amit Rao, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Jai Praksh Gautam and Sh. Santosh Kumar Singh Yadav, Ld. Counsel
for defendant.
Matter is at the stage of reply/arguments on the application u/o 12 Rule 6
CPC and application u/o 7 Rule 11 CPC.
Today, reply has been filed on behalf of the defendants to the application
u/o 12 Rule 6 CPC. Same be taken on record. Copy supplied.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that he does not want to file reply to the
application u/o 7 Rule 11 and would directly argue on the same.
Arguments heard on behalf of both the parties on the above said
applications.
List the matter for orders/clarification if any, on the above said applications
on 02.01.2026.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-20.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3
CS SCJ 886/24
Sakeena Vs. Aneesh
06.09.2025
Present: Sh. Amit Rao, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Plaintiff in person.
Defendant in person.
Sh. Jai Prakash Gautam, Sh. Santosh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is at the stage of reply/arguments on the application under order 12
rule 6 CPC and application under order 7 rule 11 CPC.
Ld. Counsel for both the parties submit that they seek time to file reply to
the above said applications and have requested for a short adjournment. Adjournment
granted.
List the matter for above said purpose on 20.09.2025.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-06.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3
CS SCJ 886/24
Sakeena Vs. Aneesh
06.09.2025
Present: Sh. Amit Rao, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Plaintiff in person.
Defendant in person.
Sh. Jai Prakash Gautam, Sh. Santosh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is at the stage of reply/arguments on the application under order 12
rule 6 CPC and application under order 7 rule 11 CPC.
Ld. Counsel for both the parties submit that they seek time to file reply to
the above said applications and have requested for a short adjournment. Adjournment
granted.
List the matter for above said purpose on 20.09.2025.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-06.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 886/24
Sakeena Vs. Aneesh
30.04.2025
Present: Sh. Amit Rao, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Ms. Diksha Sharma, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff
alongwith plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings.
Perusal of record reveals that WS has already been filed by
the defendant.
Today, an application u/O 12 Rule 6 CPC has been filed on
behalf of the plaintiff. Same be taken on record. Extra copy is retained
on record. Defendant is directed to collect the same.
List the matter for reply/arguments on the abovesaid
application on 24.05.2025.
The plaintiff submits that she has apprehension of being
attacked by the defendant. The SHO concerned is directed to ensure the
safety of the plaintiff.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts/30.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 886/24
Sakeena Vs. Aneesh
30.04.2025
Present: Sh. Amit Rao, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through VC).
Ms. Diksha Sharma, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff
alongwith plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings.
Perusal of record reveals that WS has already been filed by
the defendant.
Today, an application u/O 12 Rule 6 CPC has been filed on
behalf of the plaintiff. Same be taken on record. Extra copy is retained
on record. Defendant is directed to collect the same.
List the matter for reply/arguments on the abovesaid
application on 24.05.2025.
The plaintiff submits that she has apprehension of being
attacked by the defendant. The SHO concerned is directed to ensure the
safety of the plaintiff.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts/30.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 886/24 Sakeena Vs. Aneesh
27.01.2025
Present: None for plaintiff.
Sh. D.K. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings. However,
none is present on behalf of the plaintiff. In view of the same, matter
stands adjourned.
List the matter for completion of pleadings on 30.04.2025.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts/27.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 886/24 Sakeena Vs. Aneesh
27.01.2025
Present: None for plaintiff.
Sh. D.K. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings. However,
none is present on behalf of the plaintiff. In view of the same, matter
stands adjourned.
List the matter for completion of pleadings on 30.04.2025.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts/27.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --