Final Order 5

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 790/25
SURENDER CHOPRA Vs. KAPIL CHOPRA
28.03.2026
Present: Plaintiff in person alongwith Ld. Counsel.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1.
Defendant no. 2 in person alongwith Ld. Counsel.
Ms. Pooja Kaushik, Ld. Counsel for the defendant /
MCD.
The plaintiff suit is with regards seeking to restrain
defendants no. 1 & 2 from running illegal factories of hazardous
substances in the residential locality / area. As against defendants
no. 3, 4 & 5, the present suit seeks directions for conducting
enquiry so as to stop the illegal running of factories as aforesaid.
Statements of Ld. Counsels for defendants no. 1 to 3
have been recorded at bar. As per the same, the defendants no. 1
and 2 have stated that they have already closed / no longer
running all types of commercial / hazardous activities / business
from the site of the suit properties. In fact, defendant no. 2 has
also stated that MCD license has been obtained and in future, no
hazardous business activity shall be undertaken. Ld. Counsel for
the defendant no. 3 / MCD has likewise stated that during
inspection for sealing purposes, properties of both defendants no.
1 & 2 were found vacated as well.
In view of statements as aforesaid, plaintiff
statement has been recorded as well as to his satisfaction.
Considering the statements as above, with the only
reliefs sought by the plaintiff, in essence, being with regards
preventing the defendants from undertaking illegal / hazardous
CS SCJ 790/25 Surender Chopra Vs. Kapil Chopra pg. no. 1/2
-- 1 of 2 --
activities through factory work at the site of suit property,
regarding which undertakings have been taken already, the
present suit is liable to be decreed as no other factual
determination is required.
Accordingly, the suit stands decreed under Order 12
Rule 6 CPC and both the defendants no. 1 & 2 are hereby
permanently restrained from carrying out / running illegal /
hazardous substances / factory work at the site of the suit
property (4205, Sant Nagar, Rani Bagh / T-2 (GF, FF, SF, TF)
Sant Nagar, Rani Bagh, Delhi). Such restraint however shall not
operate against any of the defendants undertaking permissible
work from their respective premises after obtaining sanction /
license from defendants no. 3 to 5 or any other such authority in
that regard, as may be required.
Decree sheet be prepared accordingly. Statements of
the parties be made part of the decree sheet.
All pending applications, if any, stand disposed off
accordingly.
File be consigned to Record Room after necessary
compliance.
(Gaurav Sharma)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
North West/Rohini Courts/Delhi
28.03.2026
CS SCJ 790/25 Surender Chopra Vs. Kapil Chopra pg. no. 1/2
-- 2 of 2 --