Ved PrakashVsRAJENDER +3 more

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 8
CS SCJ 678/24
Ved Prakash Vs. Rajender
07.01.2026
Present : Plaintiff wit Ms. Naeem Jahan Heena, Ld. counsel for the
plaintiff.
Defendant with Sh. Sanjay Sharma, Ld. counsel for the
defendants.
Clarifications sought from Ld. counsel for defendant in
compliance of last order. Ld. counsel for defendant has submitted that
the Will in basis of which the present suit has been filed is forged and
fabricated by the plaintiff.
Ld. counsel for defendant further undertaken to pay the
cost of Rs. 5000/- imposed on defendant on 14.05.2025 during the
course of the day. WS of the defendant has already taken on record vide
order dated 14.05.2025.
Be put up for filing of replication,if any, admission denial
of documents and framing of issues on 08.04.2026.
(Gita)
ACJ/CCJ/ARC (North-West)
Rohini Courts, Delhi/07.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9
CS SCJ 678/24
Ved Prakash Vs. Rajender
14.05.2025
Present : Ms. Ritu Garg, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff with plaintiff.
Defendant in person.
An application under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC has been filed
on behalf of plaintiff for striking off the defence of the defendant.
Written Statement has been filed on behalf of defendant
alongwith an application for condonation of delay in filing of Written
Statement. Copy supplied to the plaintiff.
In the interest of justice, the delay is condoned and Written
Statement is taken on record subject to cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid to
the plaintiff on the next date of hearing.
Application is accordingly disposed off as allowed.
As the Written Statement has already been taken on record,
the application under 8 Rule 10 CPC filed on behalf of plaintiff is
disposed off as infructuous.
At this stage, a doubt is raised as to the maintainability of
the present suit as the property appears to be a J.J. property which is not
transferable in nature.
Be put up for arguments on maintainability on 20.08.2025.
(Mansi Malik)
ACJ/ARC (North-West)
Rohini Courts, Delhi/14.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10 CS SCJ 678/24 Ved Prakash Vs. Rajender
21.01.2025
Present : Ms Ld Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
Plaintiff in person.
Sh Sanjay Kumar, Ld Counsel for defendant with
defendant no. 2.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendants.
All the defendants were served on 13.06.2024.
No WS has been filed by the defendants till date.
Ld Counsel for defendant seeks an opportunity to file WS
alongwith an application for condonation of delay. Let advance copy of
the same be supplied to the plaintiff.
Be put up for further proceeding 14.05.2025.
(Mansi Malik)
ACJ/ARC (North-West)
Rohini Courts, Delhi/21.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 678/2024
VED PRAKASH VS. RAJENDER
20.05.2024
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked
and registered as per rules.
Present : Ms. Ritu Garg, Ld. counsel for plaintiff with plaintiff.
Issue fresh summons for settlement of issues to the
defendant on filing of PF within seven days returnable on 21.01.2025.
(Amardeep Kaur)
ACJ/ARC (North-West)
Rohini Courts, Delhi/20.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 17 CS SCJ 678/24 Ved Prakash Vs. Rajender
11.06.2026
Present : Sh. Burhan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant with Sh. Sanjay Sharma, Ld. counsel.
Previous cost of Rs. 5000/- imposed on defendant not paid.
Same be paid on the next date of hearing.
Replication has not been filed despite opportunities given
to plaintiff.
Pleadings are complete. Admission/denial is not pressed
for. From the pleadings of the parties, following issues are framed:
1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of mandatory
injunction against the defendant qua suit property, as prayed for?
(OPP)
2. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to decree of permanent
injunction against the defendant as prayed for? (OPP)
3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for decree of
damages/mesne profits, if so, at what rate? (OPP)
4. Relief.
No other issue arises or is pressed for. Plaintiff is directed
to file the list of witnesses within 15 days from today. Advance copy of
the evidence be supplied to the opposite party at least 7 days prior to
the next date of hearing. Put up for entire PE on 03.10.2026.
(Gita)
ACJ/CCJ/ARC (North-West)
Rohini Courts, Delhi/11.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 8
CS SCJ 678/24
Ved Prakash Vs. Rajender
07.01.2026
Present : Plaintiff wit Ms. Naeem Jahan Heena, Ld. counsel for the
plaintiff.
Defendant with Sh. Sanjay Sharma, Ld. counsel for the
defendants.
Clarifications sought from Ld. counsel for defendant in
compliance of last order. Ld. counsel for defendant has submitted that
the Will in basis of which the present suit has been filed is forged and
fabricated by the plaintiff.
Ld. counsel for defendant further undertaken to pay the
cost of Rs. 5000/- imposed on defendant on 14.05.2025 during the
course of the day. WS of the defendant has already taken on record vide
order dated 14.05.2025.
Be put up for filing of replication,if any, admission denial
of documents and framing of issues on 08.04.2026.
(Gita)
ACJ/CCJ/ARC (North-West)
Rohini Courts, Delhi/07.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9
CS SCJ 678/24
Ved Prakash Vs. Rajender
14.05.2025
Present : Ms. Ritu Garg, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff with plaintiff.
Defendant in person.
An application under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC has been filed
on behalf of plaintiff for striking off the defence of the defendant.
Written Statement has been filed on behalf of defendant
alongwith an application for condonation of delay in filing of Written
Statement. Copy supplied to the plaintiff.
In the interest of justice, the delay is condoned and Written
Statement is taken on record subject to cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid to
the plaintiff on the next date of hearing.
Application is accordingly disposed off as allowed.
As the Written Statement has already been taken on record,
the application under 8 Rule 10 CPC filed on behalf of plaintiff is
disposed off as infructuous.
At this stage, a doubt is raised as to the maintainability of
the present suit as the property appears to be a J.J. property which is not
transferable in nature.
Be put up for arguments on maintainability on 20.08.2025.
(Mansi Malik)
ACJ/ARC (North-West)
Rohini Courts, Delhi/14.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10 CS SCJ 678/24 Ved Prakash Vs. Rajender
21.01.2025
Present : Ms Ld Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
Plaintiff in person.
Sh Sanjay Kumar, Ld Counsel for defendant with
defendant no. 2.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendants.
All the defendants were served on 13.06.2024.
No WS has been filed by the defendants till date.
Ld Counsel for defendant seeks an opportunity to file WS
alongwith an application for condonation of delay. Let advance copy of
the same be supplied to the plaintiff.
Be put up for further proceeding 14.05.2025.
(Mansi Malik)
ACJ/ARC (North-West)
Rohini Courts, Delhi/21.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 678/2024
VED PRAKASH VS. RAJENDER
20.05.2024
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked
and registered as per rules.
Present : Ms. Ritu Garg, Ld. counsel for plaintiff with plaintiff.
Issue fresh summons for settlement of issues to the
defendant on filing of PF within seven days returnable on 21.01.2025.
(Amardeep Kaur)
ACJ/ARC (North-West)
Rohini Courts, Delhi/20.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --