SHARAD GOELVsVIVEK GOYAL

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ/654/2024
CNR No. DLNW03-0009982024
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
17.08.2026
Present : Sh. Aditya Goel, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through
VC).
Sh. Tushar Saigal, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Cost paid by plaintiff to the defendant.
Matter is fixed today for PE.
PW-1 cross-examined and discharged. Vide separate
statement of plaintiff, PE stands closed.
Defendant is directed to file evidence affidavit of all
its witnesses on the next date of hearing and supply 15 days
advance copy of the same to the plaintiff against proper
receiving.
Be put up for DE on 25.09.2026.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/17.08.2026(u)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 17 CS SCJ 654/24
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
02.06.2026
Present : Sh. Aditya Goel (through VC) and Sh. Pranjal
Sharma, Ld. Counsels for plaintiff with
plaintiff/PW1.
Sh. Tushar Saigal, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is fixed today for PE.
An application filed for waiving of cost.
Submissions heard.
The application filed has not accompanied with
affidavit nor the application has been supported by relevant
medical documents. No merit is found in the application.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed. Plaintiff is directed to
deposit the cost on NDOH.
Plaintiff has been examined-in-chief as PW1. At
request, cross is deferred.
Be put up for cross-examination of PW1 on
17.08.2026.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/02.06.2026(m)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19 CS SCJ 654/24
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
07.04.2026
Present : Sh. Pranjal Sharma, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Aditya Goel, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
Ms. Ishika Garg, Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant through
VC.
In between dates, the WS was filed alongwith the proof of
service.
In between date of hearings, list of witnesses was also filed on
behalf of defendant on 18.07.2025. Same is being taken on record.
Matter is fixed for PE. Affidavit of PW 1 filed. It is submitted
by Proxy Counsel for defendant that the defendant has been supplied the
copy of affidavit of PW 1 last night only, due to which, the defendant is not
able to cross-examine PW 1.
In the interest of justice and subject to cost of Rs.1,000/- to be
paid to the plaintiff by the defendant, put up for PE on 02.06.2026.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/07.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 53 CS SCJ 654/24
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
18.12.2025 (04:00 pm)
Present : None
No time left for orders.
Be put up for orders on 20.12.2025.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/18.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ 654/24
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
03.12.2025
Present : Sh. Aditya Goel, Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff through VC.
Sh. Tushar Sehgal, Ld. Counsel for Defendant through VC.
Arguments heard on leave to defend application.
Parties are at liberty to file written submissions not exceeding
5 pages with case law after marking relevant portion of same within 7 days
from today. Be put up for orders on 18.12.2025.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/03.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 30 CS SCJ 654/24
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
04.09.2025
Present : Shri Aditya Goel (through VC) and Shri Pranjal Sharma, Ld.
Counsels for plaintiff.
Shri Tushar Saigal, Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC.
Arguments on leave to defend have been heard.
Parties are at liberty to file written arguments within 10 days
from today.
Matter be re-listed for clarifications, if any/orders on
18.10.2025.
(Anuj Kumar Singh)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/04.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 26 CS SCJ 654/24
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
26.04.2025
Present : Sh. Aditya Goel, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through
VC.
Sh. Tushar Sehgal, Ld. Counsel for defendant
through VC.
Arguments heard on leave to defend.
After the conclusion of arguments, ld. Counsel for
plaintiff sought time to file reply to the leave to defend
application.
Same is opposed by Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Put up for consideration on submissions at 4:00 PM.
(Priyanka Rajpoot)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/26.04.2025
At 3:55 PM
Present : None.
The undersinged has to attend a meeting at 4:00 PM.
Let reply to the application for leave to defend be
filed positively on or before the next date of hearing with
advance copy thereof to the opposite party.
Put up for filing of filing of reply and remaining
arguments, if any on 05.07.2025.
(Priyanka Rajpoot)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/26.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 654/24
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
17.02.2025
Lawyers are abstaining from work today
due to strike
Present : Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC.
Summons were served on the defendant on
18.12.2024. However, appearance as per the prescribed format
has not been filed.
On the contrary, the defendant filed leave to defend
application on 23.12.2024.
After some deliberations, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
submits that he has no objection if the leave to defend is taken on
record and the matter be kept for arguments on the said
application.
However, he has requested that the directions may
be given to the opposite party to supply the copy of leave to
defend.
In view of submission, leave to defend is taken on
record. Ld. Counsel for defendant is directed to supply the same
to the opposite party.
Put up for reply, if any/arguments on leave to defend
on 26.04.2025.
(Priyanka Rajpoot)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/17.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 18 CS SCJ 654/24
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
06.11.2024
Present: Sh. Aditya Goel, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
The present suit is under Order 37 CPC.
A Certificate u/S 65B of Indian Evidence Act is placed on
record by Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Issue summons under
Order 37 CPC in the prescribed form
for service upon the Defendants by ordinary process as well as through
post/speed post/courier/e-mail, on previous PF, returnable for
17.02.2025. Summons be also served through electronic mode /
Whatsapp / e-mail on filing of affidavit of plaintiff qua the mobile phone
number/e-mail of defendant and soft copy of the suit as well as
documents at the email ID of the court alongwith PF, returnable for
NDOH.
Process Server is directed to give report of three mandatory
visits and in case of non-availability / refusal summon be served by way
of affixation.
Further Plaintiff to submit the internet generated tracking report of
proof of delivery of summons sent through post alongwith the certificate
of Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act for the next date.
(Priyanka Rajpoot)
SCJ cum RC, (North-West)
Rohini Courts, Delhi/06.11.2024.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19 CS SCJ/654/2024
CNR No. DLNW03-0009982024
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
25.09.2026
Present : Sh. Aditya Goel, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Tushar Saigal, Ld. Counsel for defendant
alongwith DW-1 in person.
Matter is fixed today for DE.
DW-1 examined-in-chief and partly cross-examined.
DW-1 is directed to bring GST and Income Tax
returns for the year 2022-23 as asked in his cross-examination on
NDOH.
Be put up for remaining DE on 27.10.2026.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/25.09.2026(u)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ/654/2024
CNR No. DLNW03-0009982024
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
17.08.2026
Present : Sh. Aditya Goel, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff (through
VC).
Sh. Tushar Saigal, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Cost paid by plaintiff to the defendant.
Matter is fixed today for PE.
PW-1 cross-examined and discharged. Vide separate
statement of plaintiff, PE stands closed.
Defendant is directed to file evidence affidavit of all
its witnesses on the next date of hearing and supply 15 days
advance copy of the same to the plaintiff against proper
receiving.
Be put up for DE on 25.09.2026.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/17.08.2026(u)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 17 CS SCJ 654/24
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
02.06.2026
Present : Sh. Aditya Goel (through VC) and Sh. Pranjal
Sharma, Ld. Counsels for plaintiff with
plaintiff/PW1.
Sh. Tushar Saigal, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is fixed today for PE.
An application filed for waiving of cost.
Submissions heard.
The application filed has not accompanied with
affidavit nor the application has been supported by relevant
medical documents. No merit is found in the application.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed. Plaintiff is directed to
deposit the cost on NDOH.
Plaintiff has been examined-in-chief as PW1. At
request, cross is deferred.
Be put up for cross-examination of PW1 on
17.08.2026.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/02.06.2026(m)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19 CS SCJ 654/24
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
07.04.2026
Present : Sh. Pranjal Sharma, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Aditya Goel, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
Ms. Ishika Garg, Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant through
VC.
In between dates, the WS was filed alongwith the proof of
service.
In between date of hearings, list of witnesses was also filed on
behalf of defendant on 18.07.2025. Same is being taken on record.
Matter is fixed for PE. Affidavit of PW 1 filed. It is submitted
by Proxy Counsel for defendant that the defendant has been supplied the
copy of affidavit of PW 1 last night only, due to which, the defendant is not
able to cross-examine PW 1.
In the interest of justice and subject to cost of Rs.1,000/- to be
paid to the plaintiff by the defendant, put up for PE on 02.06.2026.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/07.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 53 CS SCJ 654/24
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
18.12.2025 (04:00 pm)
Present : None
No time left for orders.
Be put up for orders on 20.12.2025.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/18.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 29 CS SCJ 654/24
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
03.12.2025
Present : Sh. Aditya Goel, Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff through VC.
Sh. Tushar Sehgal, Ld. Counsel for Defendant through VC.
Arguments heard on leave to defend application.
Parties are at liberty to file written submissions not exceeding
5 pages with case law after marking relevant portion of same within 7 days
from today. Be put up for orders on 18.12.2025.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/03.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 30 CS SCJ 654/24
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
04.09.2025
Present : Shri Aditya Goel (through VC) and Shri Pranjal Sharma, Ld.
Counsels for plaintiff.
Shri Tushar Saigal, Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC.
Arguments on leave to defend have been heard.
Parties are at liberty to file written arguments within 10 days
from today.
Matter be re-listed for clarifications, if any/orders on
18.10.2025.
(Anuj Kumar Singh)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/04.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 26 CS SCJ 654/24
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
26.04.2025
Present : Sh. Aditya Goel, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through
VC.
Sh. Tushar Sehgal, Ld. Counsel for defendant
through VC.
Arguments heard on leave to defend.
After the conclusion of arguments, ld. Counsel for
plaintiff sought time to file reply to the leave to defend
application.
Same is opposed by Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Put up for consideration on submissions at 4:00 PM.
(Priyanka Rajpoot)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/26.04.2025
At 3:55 PM
Present : None.
The undersinged has to attend a meeting at 4:00 PM.
Let reply to the application for leave to defend be
filed positively on or before the next date of hearing with
advance copy thereof to the opposite party.
Put up for filing of filing of reply and remaining
arguments, if any on 05.07.2025.
(Priyanka Rajpoot)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/26.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 654/24
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
17.02.2025
Lawyers are abstaining from work today
due to strike
Present : Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC.
Summons were served on the defendant on
18.12.2024. However, appearance as per the prescribed format
has not been filed.
On the contrary, the defendant filed leave to defend
application on 23.12.2024.
After some deliberations, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
submits that he has no objection if the leave to defend is taken on
record and the matter be kept for arguments on the said
application.
However, he has requested that the directions may
be given to the opposite party to supply the copy of leave to
defend.
In view of submission, leave to defend is taken on
record. Ld. Counsel for defendant is directed to supply the same
to the opposite party.
Put up for reply, if any/arguments on leave to defend
on 26.04.2025.
(Priyanka Rajpoot)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/17.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 18 CS SCJ 654/24
SHARAD GOEL Vs. VIVEK GOYAL
06.11.2024
Present: Sh. Aditya Goel, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
The present suit is under Order 37 CPC.
A Certificate u/S 65B of Indian Evidence Act is placed on
record by Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Issue summons under
Order 37 CPC in the prescribed form
for service upon the Defendants by ordinary process as well as through
post/speed post/courier/e-mail, on previous PF, returnable for
17.02.2025. Summons be also served through electronic mode /
Whatsapp / e-mail on filing of affidavit of plaintiff qua the mobile phone
number/e-mail of defendant and soft copy of the suit as well as
documents at the email ID of the court alongwith PF, returnable for
NDOH.
Process Server is directed to give report of three mandatory
visits and in case of non-availability / refusal summon be served by way
of affixation.
Further Plaintiff to submit the internet generated tracking report of
proof of delivery of summons sent through post alongwith the certificate
of Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act for the next date.
(Priyanka Rajpoot)
SCJ cum RC, (North-West)
Rohini Courts, Delhi/06.11.2024.
-- 1 of 1 --