Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 6

CNR DLNW03000996202623 May 2026
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 6 · 23 May 2026 · CNR DLNW030009962026

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 33 CS SCJ 602/26
CANARA BANK Vs. RAJIV KUMAR PASWAN
23.05.2026 (03:00 pm)
Present : None
Matter is fixed today for orders.
The present suit is for recovery of sum of Rs.
1,36,252/-. On the LDOH, the Ld. Counsel for plaintiff filed
relevant judgment on the maintainability of the present suit and
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff also advanced his submissions on the
maintainability of the present suit.
Heard. Perused.
After perusal of the record, it is found that the
defendant took a loan of Rs. 50,000/- from the plaintiff i.e.
Canara Bank on 27.05.2016. Later the defedant stopped paying
the EMI. The said loan was declared NPA on 26.10.2016. The
defendant executed an acknowledgment of debt on 27.08.2023. It
is submitted by the counsel for the plaintiff that the suit is within
limitation from the date of acknowledgment of debt i.e.
27.08.2023.
It is noted that section 18 of the Limitation Act,
1963 specifically states that for availing the benefit of section 18,
the acknowledgment of liability in respect of property or right
must be before expiration of the prescribed period of limitation
for a suit. The prescribed period of limitation for the suit of
recovery of money is 3 years from the date of loan. In the case at
hand, the period of limitation of 3 years shall start reckoning on
26.10.2016, which would have expired on 25.10.2019. Later, the
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
defendant has acknowledged debt on 27.08.2023, which is also
beyond the period of limitation.
The case of IL & FS FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD
Vs. ADHUNIK MEGHALAYA STEEL PVT. LTD
MANU/SC/0996/2025 does not apply to the facts of this case.
The case of B. Prashanth Hegde Vs. SBI MANU/SC/0156/2026
also does not come to the rescue of the plaintiff as in that case the
period of limitation was extended by various working capital
consortium agreements executed between the parties, after the
acknowledgment of debt.
In view of the above discussion, the suit is barred by
limitation and plaint is rejected u/o 7 rule 11 (d).
File be consigned to Record Room after due
compliance.
(Mayank Mittal)
SCJ-cum-RC, North-West,
Rohini Courts, Delhi/23.05.2026(u)
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.