TrustJury record updated 21 Oct 2026
Not available
Date: 05-04-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 09-05-2024 Date: 09-05-2024 Business: none Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 05-08-2024 Date: 05-08-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 26-10-2024 Date: 26-10-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 25-01-2025 Date: 25-01-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 26-04-2025 Date: 26-04-2025 Business: ARG Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 20-09-2025 Date: 20-09-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 07-01-2026 Date: 07-01-2026 Business: dismissed Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED Disposal Date: 07-01-2026
Filing Number: 709/2024 Filing Date: 03-04-2024 eFiling Number: ADL20230000544C202400010 eFiling Date: 02-04-2024 First Hearing Date: 05th April 2024 Decision Date: 07th January 2026 Court Number And Judge: 532-JSCC-cum-Addl. SCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: M - SCJ 95/24 SUDHA GUPTA Vs. SAURAB MADAAN 07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Anil K Chabbra, Ld. Counsel for the applicant. Mr. Ajay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the non applicant through VC. Arguments heard on the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. An application of such a kind can be favorably considered only when the applicant is able to show that either summons were not duly served upon him or that he…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 27 M – SCJ 95/24 SUDHA GUPTA Vs. SAURAB MADAAN 25.01.2025 Present : Sh. Saurabh Pandit, Ld. Proxy counsel for applicant. Sh. Ajay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for non applicant. Arguments heard on behalf of non applicant. Adjournment is sought on behalf of the applicant on the ground that the counsel is not available today. Heard. Allowed subject to cost of Rs. 3,000/- to be paid by applicant to non applicant on 26.04.2025. (NAINA GUPTA) JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-GJ North-West, Rohini Courts Delhi/25.01.2025 At 2:00 pm. Present : Sh. Anil Chhabra, Ld. Counsel for applicant. Ld. Counsel for applicant has advanced arguments on the application, in view thereof order of the imposition of cost is re-called. Arguments on behalf of counsel for non applicant already heard. List the matter for date already fixed i.e. 26.04.2025. (NAINA GUPTA) JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-GJ North-West, Rohini Courts Delhi/25.01.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 35 M- CJ 95/24 SUDHA GUPTA Vs. SAURAB MADAAN 26.10.2024 The undersigned has been transferred vide Office Order bearing No.38/DHC/Gaz-IIB/G-7/VI.E.2(a)/2024 dated 25.10.2024 of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. Present : Proxy counsel for applicant. Sh. Ajay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for non-applicant. Put up for arguments on the present application on 25.01.2025. (NEHA MITTAL) JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-GJ North-West, Rohini Courts Delhi/26.10.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9 M-SCJ 95/24 SUDHA GUPTA Vs. SAURAB MADAAN 05.08.2024 Present : Sh. Anil Kumar Chhabra, Counsel for applicant through VC. Sh. Ajay Kumar, Counsel for non-applicant. Ahlmad has not tagged the main file with the present application despite direction. He is directed to file an explanation within 2 days as to why action should not be taken against him. Reply to the present application has been filed. Let its copy be supplied against acknowledgment. Main file be summoned for the next date. Put up for arguments on application on 26.10.2024. (NEHA MITTAL) JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-GJ North-West, Rohini Courts Delhi/05.08.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 17 M-SCJ 95/24 SUDHA GUPTA Vs. SAURAB MADAAN 09.05.2024 Present: Sh. Saurabh, Proxy counsel for applicant. This is an application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC filed on behalf of applicant/defendant for setting aside decree and judgment dated 22.11.2022. Issue notice of the present application on filing of PF/RC, returnable for 05.08.2024. Main file be also summoned for next date. (NEHA MITTAL) JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-GJ (North-West) Rohini Courts, Delhi/09.05.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: M SCJ No. 95/24 Sudha Gupta Vs. Saurabh Madaan 05.04.2024 (Fresh Application received through e-mode by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules) Present: None for applicant. Physical file is yet to be filed. Be filed well before NDOH. To come up for appearance of the applicant/filing of physical file/consideration on 09.05.2024. (NEHA MITTAL) JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-GJ (North-West) Rohini Courts, Delhi/05.04.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 27 M – SCJ 95/24 SUDHA GUPTA Vs. SAURAB MADAAN 25.01.2025 Present : Sh. Saurabh Pandit, Ld. Proxy counsel for applicant. Sh. Ajay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for non applicant. Arguments heard on behalf of non applicant. Adjournment is sought on behalf of the applicant on the ground that the counsel is not available today. Heard. Allowed subject to cost of Rs. 3,000/- to be paid by applicant to non applicant on 26.04.2025. (NAINA GUPTA) JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-GJ North-West, Rohini Courts Delhi/25.01.2025 At 2:00 pm. Present : Sh. Anil Chhabra, Ld. Counsel for applicant. Ld. Counsel for applicant has advanced arguments on the application, in view thereof order of the imposition of cost is re-called. Arguments on behalf of counsel for non applicant already heard. List the matter for date already fixed i.e. 26.04.2025. (NAINA GUPTA) JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-GJ North-West, Rohini Courts Delhi/25.01.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 35 M- CJ 95/24 SUDHA GUPTA Vs. SAURAB MADAAN 26.10.2024 The undersigned has been transferred vide Office Order bearing No.38/DHC/Gaz-IIB/G-7/VI.E.2(a)/2024 dated 25.10.2024 of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. Present : Proxy counsel for applicant. Sh. Ajay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for non-applicant. Put up for arguments on the present application on 25.01.2025. (NEHA MITTAL) JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-GJ North-West, Rohini Courts Delhi/26.10.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9 M-SCJ 95/24 SUDHA GUPTA Vs. SAURAB MADAAN 05.08.2024 Present : Sh. Anil Kumar Chhabra, Counsel for applicant through VC. Sh. Ajay Kumar, Counsel for non-applicant. Ahlmad has not tagged the main file with the present application despite direction. He is directed to file an explanation within 2 days as to why action should not be taken against him. Reply to the present application has been filed. Let its copy be supplied against acknowledgment. Main file be summoned for the next date. Put up for arguments on application on 26.10.2024. (NEHA MITTAL) JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-GJ North-West, Rohini Courts Delhi/05.08.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 17 M-SCJ 95/24 SUDHA GUPTA Vs. SAURAB MADAAN 09.05.2024 Present: Sh. Saurabh, Proxy counsel for applicant. This is an application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC filed on behalf of applicant/defendant for setting aside decree and judgment dated 22.11.2022. Issue notice of the present application on filing of PF/RC, returnable for 05.08.2024. Main file be also summoned for next date. (NEHA MITTAL) JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-GJ (North-West) Rohini Courts, Delhi/09.05.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: M SCJ No. 95/24 Sudha Gupta Vs. Saurabh Madaan 05.04.2024 (Fresh Application received through e-mode by way of assignment. It be checked and registered as per rules) Present: None for applicant. Physical file is yet to be filed. Be filed well before NDOH. To come up for appearance of the applicant/filing of physical file/consideration on 09.05.2024. (NEHA MITTAL) JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-GJ (North-West) Rohini Courts, Delhi/05.04.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
