Skip to main content
CS SCJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR CIVIL JUDGE

V.C. TRADERSVsBALANCE ART CONSTRUCTION +2 more

CNR DLNW030006062025532-JSCC-cum-Addl. SCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 21 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
421/2025
Registration Date
19 Apr 2025
Next Hearing Date
23 Dec 2026
Case Stage
Misc. cases/purpose

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    4

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Recovery of Money · Sec 74

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 19-04-2025
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 15-05-2025
    
    Date: 15-05-2025
    Business: LD PO IS ON MATERNITY LEAVE
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 01-07-2025
    
    Date: 01-07-2025
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 06-09-2025
    
    Date: 06-09-2025
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 26-09-2025
    
    Date: 26-09-2025
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 29-01-2026
    
    Date: 29-01-2026
    Business: misc
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 14-05-2026
    
    Date: 14-05-2026
    Business: lawyers are abstaining work for today
    adjourned
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 10-09-2026
    
    Date: 10-09-2026
    Business: FP
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 23-12-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 610/2025
    Filing Date: 16-04-2025
    eFiling Number: ADL20240007228C202500027
    eFiling Date: 16-04-2025
    First Hearing Date: 19th April 2025
    Court Number And Judge: 532-JSCC-cum-Addl. SCJ-cum-Guardian Judge

    Orders

    12
    Interim Order 6
    10 Sept 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 4
    CS SCJ 421/25
    V.C. TRADERS
    Vs.
    BALANCE ART CONSTRUCTION
    10.09.2026
    Present: Sh. Harshit Goel, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
    through VC.
    Last and final opportunity is given to the plaintiff to
    verify the address of the defendant, failing which the suit shall be
    dismissed for non prosecution.
    Re-list on 23.12.2026.
    (Mansi Malik)
    JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
    North West / Rohini Courts /Delhi
    10.09.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 5
    14 May 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS SCJ 421/25
    V.C. TRADERS Vs. BALANCE ART CONSTRUCTION
    14.05.2026
    Lawyers are abstaining from work today.
    Present: None.
    Summons issued in the name of defendant no. 1
    returned back with the report not found.
    Summons issued in the name of defendants no. 2 &
    3 returned back with the report unavailable.
    Plaintiff to verify defendants addresses.
    Re-list on 10.09.2026.
    (Gaurav Sharma)
    JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
    North West/Rohini Courts/Delhi
    14.05.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 4
    29 Jan 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS SCJ 421/25
    V.C. TRADERS Vs. BALANCE ART CONSTRUCTION
    29.01.2026
    Present: None.
    Previous order not complied with. To be complied
    afresh for NDOH. Final opportunity granted failing which suit
    shall be dismissed for non prosecution.
    Re-list on 14.05.2026.
    (Gaurav Sharma)
    JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
    North West/Rohini Courts/Delhi
    29.01.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 3
    26 Sept 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS SCJ 421/25
    V.C. TRADERS Vs. BALANCE ART CONSTRUCTION
    26.09.2025
    Present: Mr. Varun Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
    In terms of previous order, application under O 6 R
    17 CPC has been filed together with deficient Court fee.
    Reader has reported the overall Court fee to be now
    in order.
    Further, vide the application under O 6 R 17 CPC,
    the inadvertent error of stating the defendant firm as
    proprietorship in paragraph no. 5 of the plaint is sought to be
    amended. The amendment is seen to be formal in nature. As such
    therefore, the application is allowed. Amended plaint taken on
    record.
    With respect to the cause of action and the period of
    limitation, Ld. Counsel has relied upon judgment of the Hon’ble
    Supreme Court as stated in paragraph no. 21 of the amended
    plaint. For the time being, the same is seen to be satisfactory.
    In view of the above, let summons be issued to all
    the defendants on filing of PF / RC / through all prescribed
    modes returnable for NDOH.
    Re-list on 29.01.2026.
    (Gaurav Sharma)
    JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
    North West/Rohini Courts/Delhi
    26.09.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    06 Sept 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS SCJ 421/25
    V.C. TRADERS Vs. BALANCE ART CONSTRUCTION
    06.09.2025
    Present: Mr. Varun Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
    through VC.
    Time sought in terms of previous order. Heard.
    Allowed.
    Re-list on 26.09.2025.
    (Gaurav Sharma)
    JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
    North West/Rohini Courts/Delhi
    06.09.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    01 Jul 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 5 CS SCJ 421/25
    V.C. TRADERS Vs. BALANCE ART CONSTRUCTION
    01.07.2025
    Present : Mr. Varun Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
    (through VC).
    The Reader has reported that Court Fee deposited is
    deficient. Further, the last transaction between the parties is of
    the year 2020 and the suit has been filed in the year 2025. The
    limitation aspect therefore is also required to be explained.
    Further, though defendants no. 2 and 3 have been made parties
    being partners of defendant no. 1 firm but paragraph no. 5 of the
    plaint states the defendant no. 1 firm to be a proprietorship
    instead. Clarifications required on the same as well. Time sought.
    Heard. Allowed.
    Re-list for 06.09.2025.
    (GAURAV SHARMA)
    JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-GJ
    North-West, Rohini Courts
    Delhi/01.07.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 6
    10 Sept 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 4
    CS SCJ 421/25
    V.C. TRADERS
    Vs.
    BALANCE ART CONSTRUCTION
    10.09.2026
    Present: Sh. Harshit Goel, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
    through VC.
    Last and final opportunity is given to the plaintiff to
    verify the address of the defendant, failing which the suit shall be
    dismissed for non prosecution.
    Re-list on 23.12.2026.
    (Mansi Malik)
    JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
    North West / Rohini Courts /Delhi
    10.09.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 5
    14 May 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS SCJ 421/25
    V.C. TRADERS Vs. BALANCE ART CONSTRUCTION
    14.05.2026
    Lawyers are abstaining from work today.
    Present: None.
    Summons issued in the name of defendant no. 1
    returned back with the report not found.
    Summons issued in the name of defendants no. 2 &
    3 returned back with the report unavailable.
    Plaintiff to verify defendants addresses.
    Re-list on 10.09.2026.
    (Gaurav Sharma)
    JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
    North West/Rohini Courts/Delhi
    14.05.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 4
    29 Jan 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS SCJ 421/25
    V.C. TRADERS Vs. BALANCE ART CONSTRUCTION
    29.01.2026
    Present: None.
    Previous order not complied with. To be complied
    afresh for NDOH. Final opportunity granted failing which suit
    shall be dismissed for non prosecution.
    Re-list on 14.05.2026.
    (Gaurav Sharma)
    JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
    North West/Rohini Courts/Delhi
    29.01.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3
    26 Sept 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS SCJ 421/25
    V.C. TRADERS Vs. BALANCE ART CONSTRUCTION
    26.09.2025
    Present: Mr. Varun Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
    In terms of previous order, application under O 6 R
    17 CPC has been filed together with deficient Court fee.
    Reader has reported the overall Court fee to be now
    in order.
    Further, vide the application under O 6 R 17 CPC,
    the inadvertent error of stating the defendant firm as
    proprietorship in paragraph no. 5 of the plaint is sought to be
    amended. The amendment is seen to be formal in nature. As such
    therefore, the application is allowed. Amended plaint taken on
    record.
    With respect to the cause of action and the period of
    limitation, Ld. Counsel has relied upon judgment of the Hon’ble
    Supreme Court as stated in paragraph no. 21 of the amended
    plaint. For the time being, the same is seen to be satisfactory.
    In view of the above, let summons be issued to all
    the defendants on filing of PF / RC / through all prescribed
    modes returnable for NDOH.
    Re-list on 29.01.2026.
    (Gaurav Sharma)
    JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
    North West/Rohini Courts/Delhi
    26.09.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    06 Sept 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS SCJ 421/25
    V.C. TRADERS Vs. BALANCE ART CONSTRUCTION
    06.09.2025
    Present: Mr. Varun Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
    through VC.
    Time sought in terms of previous order. Heard.
    Allowed.
    Re-list on 26.09.2025.
    (Gaurav Sharma)
    JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
    North West/Rohini Courts/Delhi
    06.09.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    01 Jul 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 5 CS SCJ 421/25
    V.C. TRADERS Vs. BALANCE ART CONSTRUCTION
    01.07.2025
    Present : Mr. Varun Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
    (through VC).
    The Reader has reported that Court Fee deposited is
    deficient. Further, the last transaction between the parties is of
    the year 2020 and the suit has been filed in the year 2025. The
    limitation aspect therefore is also required to be explained.
    Further, though defendants no. 2 and 3 have been made parties
    being partners of defendant no. 1 firm but paragraph no. 5 of the
    plaint states the defendant no. 1 firm to be a proprietorship
    instead. Clarifications required on the same as well. Time sought.
    Heard. Allowed.
    Re-list for 06.09.2025.
    (GAURAV SHARMA)
    JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-GJ
    North-West, Rohini Courts
    Delhi/01.07.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.