Full Order Text
Order 6 · 10 Jul 2026 · CNR DLNW030005542025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 19 CS SCJ 389/25 Sushil Kumar Shukla Vs. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan though its Commissioner 10.07.2026 Present: Sh. P.K. Dash, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC. Sh. Abhinav Bansal, Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant no. 1. Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 2 and 3 through VC. Report has been filed stating that WS has been filed. The same has been traced by the reader and has been placed on record. Copy supplied. It is stated that the application 8 rule 1 CPC filed by the defendant no. 2 and 3 that certain documents of the plaint were illegible. Hence, a legible copy was obtained and WS was prepared, hence, there has been a delay of 217 days in filing of WS. It is prayed that the same be condoned as the same is neither intentional nor deliberate. Per contra, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has opposed the application stating that no plausible reason has been given. Heard. Record perused. Considering the submissions made by the defendant and in order to adjudicate the dispute on merits, the delay is condoned subject to cost of Rs. 2000/- to be paid to the plaintiff. Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant no.1 submits that the main counsel is not available . Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has pressed his application under order 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC. Ld. Counsel for defendant seeks some time to address arguments on the application. At request be put up for arguments on application under order 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC for 19.08.2026. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge/N-W District 10.07.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
