Interim Order 4

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 22 CS SCJ 389/25
Sushil Kumar Shukla Vs. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan though its
Commissioner
29.01.2026
Present: Sh. P.K. Dass, J.P. Sharma, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Gurvinder Sigh, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 3.
Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1 through VC.
Defendant no. 4 is already ex parte.
Fresh vakalatnama has been filed for defendant no. 3. Be
taken on record.
In between the dates of hearing, a WS has been filed on
behalf of defendant no. 1 along with an application seeking condonation
of delay.
Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1 has argued that the delay
was caused due to procedure being adopted for obtaining the record
which was necessary for filing the WS.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has stated that no sufficient reason
has been shown by the defendant to explain day to day delay in filing of
the WS. He further submits that the defendant has wrongly mentioned
the delay of 82 days in place of 115 days.
Heard. Record perused.
The reason mentioned by the defendant no. 1 seems to be
sufficient for the purpose of condoning of delay. Accordingly, the
application stands allowed. WS of defendant no. 1 is taken on record
subject to cost of Rs. 2000/- to be paid to the plaintiff.
Be put up for completion of pleadings for 03.03.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-29.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --