Interim Order 3

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 358/25
RAJENDRA KUMAR Vs. ROHIT
31.10.2025
Present: Plaintiff in person alongwith Ld. Counsel.
Defendant no. 2 in person alongwith Ld. Counsels Mr.
Charul Chaudhary, Ms. Farah Naaz and Mr. Mohd. Tausif
Zahir. (Fresh
vakalatnama filed. Taken on record.)
Summons issued in the name of defendant no. 1 Rohit in
usual course returned back with the report ‘address unavailable’. As per
directions however, no photographs have been filed qua affixation, which
ostensibly may be because of the address having not been found.
Electronic service report shows double white ticks which are not
conclusive since it is not clear as to whether copy of the plaint was also
sent alongwith.
Be that as it may, since the address of defendant no. 1 has
not been verified and Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff states that defendant
no. 1 is intentionally trying to evade service of summons, the Court is of
the view that dasti summons be given as well to the plaintiff.
In view of the above, let defendant no. 1 be served by way
of affixation on filing of PF returnable for NDOH. Copies of photographs
be attached with the summons report to be furnished. The plaintiff to
accompany the Process Server for ruling out any doubt regarding finding
of the address of defendant no. 1.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 2 states that copy of the
plaint received is incomplete as the pleadings contained therein before
paragraph no. 6 are missing. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff to supply a
complete set to the Ld. Counsel. Subject to the same, let WS be filed
with an advance copy to the opposing side at least a week prior to
NDOH.
Re-list on 17.12.2025.
(Gaurav Sharma)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
North West/Rohini Courts/Delhi
31.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --