Full Order Text
Final Order 6 · 21 Apr 2025 · CNR DLNW030003952024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDGMENT Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF MS. MANSI MALIK, ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL JUDGE/ADDITIONAL RENT CONTROLLER : NORTH- WEST DISTRICT: ROHINI COURTS: DELHI. Succ. Court 24/2024 CNR No. DLNW03-000395-2024 Date of Filing : 22.02.2024 Date of Judgment : 21.04.2025 Final Order : Petition allowed. In the matter of: 1. Sh. Rajender Parshad Gupta, S/o Late Sh. Satya Narain Gupta, R/o C-2/4, Phase-2, Ashok Vihar, Delhi110052. ... Petitioner VERSUS 1. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) 2. Smt. Laxmi Devi, W/o Late Sh. Satya Narain Gupta, R/o 2/4, Phase-2, Ashok Vihar, Delhi110052. 3. Smt. Kanta Brijkishore Chaudhary, D/o Late Sh. Satya Narain Gupta, R/o Bungla No. 13, Viraj Colony, NR Surya Hospital Opp. Tarkapur Bus Stand, Sawedi, Savedi Road, Ahmadnagar, Maharashtra-414003. 4. Smt. Manju Aggarwal, D/o Late Sh. Satya Narain Gupta, W/o Shree Ram Aggarwal, R/o 27, Cantonment Cantt. Kanpur Nagar, Kanpur Cantt., SCC No. 24/2024 Rajender Prasad Gupta Vs. State Page No. 1 of 6 -- 1 of 6 -- Utter Pradesh-208004. 5. Smt. Poonam Bharat Sarawagi, D/o Late Sh. Satya Narain Gupta, W/o Sh. Bharat Sarawagi, R/o 26, Varsha C.H.S. Ltd. 69/B Nepeansea Road, near P.D.P. Park, Nepeansea Road Malabar Hill, Mumbai, Maharashtra-400006. 5. Sh. Ramesh Gupta, S/o Late Sh. Satya Narain Gupta, R/o H. No. 1, Atur Park, Naylor Road, Opp. St. Mita College Pune, Maharashtra-411001. … Respondents JUDGMENT ON PETITION UNDER SECTION 372 OF THE INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 372 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, seeking issuance of succession certificate with respect to the PPF account bearing no. 10525778672 with State Bank of India, Keshav Puram Branch, ( hereinafter referred to as “assets”) left behind by the deceased late Sh. Satya Narain Gupta ( hereinafter referred to as “deceased”). 2. It is stated in the petition that deceased late Sh. Satya Narain Gupta expired on 23.07.2023 and at that time he was ordinarily residing at C-2/4, Phase-2, Ashok Vihar, Delhi110052. It is stated that the deceased was having a PPF account bearing no. 10525778672 with State Bank of India, Keshav Puram Branch. Petitioner and respondent no. 6 being the sons, respondent no. 2 being the wife, respondent no. 3 to 5 being the daughters of the deceased are the only surviving legal SCC No. 24/2024 Rajender Prasad Gupta Vs. State Page No. 2 of 6 -- 2 of 6 -- heirs of the deceased. It is stated that there is no impediment to the grant of succession certificate under the Succession Act. 3. After filing of present petition, notice was issued and general public was served through publication in daily newspaper 'Veer Arjun', Hindi edition dated 16.05.2024 to invite objections from the public at large to the grant of succession certificate to the petitioner but none appeared from general public to oppose or contest the present petition. 4. As per the LR report filed by the Tehsildar, Saraswati Vihar, Rajender Parshad Gupta (son), Laxmi Devi (wife), Kanta Brijkishore Chaudhary (daughter), Ramesh Gupta (son), Manju Agarwal (daughter) and Poonam Bharat Sarawagi (daughter) are the only legal heirs of the deceased. 5. During the summary proceedings conducted as per Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act,1925, eight witnesses were examined. 6. PW-1/ Petitioner Rajender Parshad Gupta tendered his evidence by way of affidavit i.e. Ex. PW-1/A, testifying that he is the son of the deceased. He further testified that there are six legal heirs of the deceased i.e. himself and respondent no. 2 to 6, who have already given their NOCs in his favour. PW-1 relied upon the following documents: (a) Copy of her Aadhar card i.e. Ex. PW-1/1 (OSR); (b) Death certificate of the deceased i.e. Ex. PW-1/2; (c) Copy of passbook of PPF account bearing no. 10525778672 in the name of deceased i.e. Mark A; (d) Surviving member certificate i.e. Ex. PW-1/4; (e) Copy of Will of the deceased i.e. Ex. PW-1/5(colly)(OSR). SCC No. 24/2024 Rajender Prasad Gupta Vs. State Page No. 3 of 6 -- 3 of 6 -- 7. RW-1/Satish, Bailiff, SDM Office, Saraswati Vihar, Delhi, has produced LR report of deceased Satya Narain Gupta which is Ex. RW-1/1. 8. RW-2/Deepak Kumar, Clerk, SBI, Keshav Puram Branch, Delhi, has brought on record details of debts and securities i.e. details in respect of PPF account No.10525778672, in the name of Sh. Satya Narain Gupta, as per which there is a balance of Rs. 37,87,476.36/- as on 18.11.2024 in the said account. He further stated that as per record, there is no nominee in respect of the said account. 9. RW-3/Smt. Laxmi Devi Gupta, RW-4/Smt. Kanta Brijkishore Chaudhary, RW-5/Smt. Manju Aggarwal, RW-6/Smt. Poonam Bharat Sarawagi and RW-7/Sh. Ramesh Gupta have filed their joint Written Statement, which is Ex. R-1. RW-3, RW-4, RW-5, RW-6 and RW-7 further testified that they have no objection, if the succession certificate in respect of their shares is issued in favor of petitioner. They also relied upon copy of their Aadhar cards i.e. Ex. RW-3/1(OSR), Ex. RW-4/1(OSR), Ex. RW-5/1(OSR), Ex. RW-6/1(OSR) and Ex. RW-7/1 (OSR) to establish their identities. 10. Thereafter, PE was closed on 04.02.2025 and the matter was listed for final arguments. 11. Heard. Perused. 12. From the material on record, it stands proved that deceased late SCC No. 24/2024 Rajender Prasad Gupta Vs. State Page No. 4 of 6 -- 4 of 6 -- Sh. Satya Narain Gupta expired on 23.07.2023 and at that time he was ordinarily residing at C-2/4, Phase-2, Ashok Vihar, Delhi-110052, which confers the territorial jurisdiction upon this Court. 13. As per the LR report filed by Tehsildar, Saraswati Vihar, Delhi, the deceased left behind Rajender Parshad Gupta (son), Laxmi Devi (wife), Kanta Brijkishore Chaudhary (daughter), Ramesh Gupta (son), Manju Agarwal (daughter) and Poonam Bharat Sarawagi (daughter) as his surviving legal heirs. From the testimony of concerned officials/banks, the total amount payable towards the deceased towards the assets in question has been brought on record. The succession certificate has been sought in favour of petitioner and the remaining LRs have already issued their NOCs in his favor. Petitioner is otherwise also the Class-1 Legal heir of the deceased being his son and no impediment has been brought on record in respect of grant of succession certificate in favor of petitioner. 14. Considering the above, petitioner Smt. Rajender Parshad Gupta is held entitled to the Succession Certificate in respect of the following assets of the deceased Late Sh. Satya Narain Gupta, along with accrued interest, if any. Nature of securities Bank Amount PPF account No.10525778672 State Bank of India, Keshav Puram Branch Rs. 37,87,476.36/- as on 18.11.2024 15. The succession certificate be issued in favor of petitioner Rajender Parshad Gupta on furnishing of an Indemnity Bond of the same value with one surety of like amount each within one month from today. Petitioner to file court fees in terms of Article 12 Schedule 1 of SCC No. 24/2024 Rajender Prasad Gupta Vs. State Page No. 5 of 6 -- 5 of 6 -- the Court Fees Act as applicable to Delhi for issuance of succession certificate. 16. It is clarified, that succession certificate shall be considered only as an entitlement of the petitioner to receive the amount due towards Sh. Satya Narain Gupta from concerned bank so as to discharge the debtor(s). 17. Since nothing else survives, file be consigned to Record Room after due compliance. Announced in an Open Court on 21.04.2025. (Mansi Malik) ACJ/ARC/North-West District Rohini District Courts, Delhi. SCC No. 24/2024 Rajender Prasad Gupta Vs. State Page No. 6 of 6 -- 6 of 6 --
