DINESH KUMAR DABASVsSURESH DABAS +1 more

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
31.07.2026
Present: Sh. J.V. Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with the
plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Today replication has been filed along with affidavit of
admission/denial on behalf of the plaintiff. The same is objected by the
defendant being time barred.
Submissions heard.
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for defendant has filed an
application under order 11 rule 12, 14 and 15 CPC. Copy supplied. Let
reply if any be filed with advance copy to the opposite party.
Be put up for completion of pleadings and arguments on
application under order 11 rule 12, 14 and 15 CPC on 01.09.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge/N-W District
31.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 40 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
26.05.2026
This is parcha yadasht
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Sh. Jatin Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Ahlmad has informed that the present case file is
not traceable and seeks one week time to trace the same. Time
granted.
An affidavit for admission/denial has been filed on
behalf of the defendant. Copy supplied.
Ld. Counsel for defendant submits that he wishes to
address arguments on the maintainability of the suit.
List the matter for further proceedings on
31.07.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-26.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 36 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
14.03.2026
Matter taken up today as per the directions of Hon'ble High Court of
Delhi as 02.03.2026 was declared a holiday vide circular no.
64/G-4/Genl.I/DHC dated 27.02.2026.
Present: Sh. J. V. Rana Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Sh. Jatin Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for defendant alongwith
defendant.
Vide separate order on application under order 39 rule 1
and 2 CPC is disposed off.
Be put up for completion of pleadings/admission denial for
26.05.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-14.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 34 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
20.02.2026
Present: None for plaintiff.
Sh. Jatin Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for defendant alongwith
defendant.
In between the dates of hearing, certain documents and case
laws were filed on behalf of the plaintiff in support of his arguments on
the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.
Ld. Counsel for defendant submits that advance copy was
supplied to him and he has stated that the said document ie. notification
dated 16.05.2017 does not make any difference to his arguments.
Heard. Record perused.
Put up for clarification, if any/orders on 02.03.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-20.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 37 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
07.02.2026
Present: Sh. J.V. Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Jatin Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Arguments heard on the application under order 39 rule 1
and 2 CPC.
Documents have been filed by both the parties during the
course of arguments. Be taken on record. (the same has been objected by
the ld. counsel for the defendant) Copy be supplied.
Be put up for clarifications if any/orders on 20.02.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-07.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 39 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
05.02.2026
Present: Sh. J.V. Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh.Jatin Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Today, an application seeking waiver of cost has been filed
on behalf of the defendant. Copy supplied. Contents of the application
perused.
Submissions heard.
Perusal reveals that cost was imposed on the defendant on
the last date of hearing while providing opportunity to file WS after
delay.
In view of this court, no sufficient ground has been brought
forward to consider the present application seeking waiver.
Accordingly, the application in hand is dismissed and disposed off.
Cost paid.
Copy of WS has been supplied today to the plaintiff,
however, directions were to supply an advance copy.
Ld. Counsel for defendant seeks time to advance arguments
on application under order 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC.
One last opportunity is granted to the defendant to address
arguments of the application.
Be put up for arguments on application under order 39 rule
1 and 2 CPC 07.02.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-05.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 40 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
17.01.2026
Present: Sh. J.V. Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Jatin Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Arguments heard on application under order 8 rule 1 CPC.
Be put up for clarifications if any/orders on 22.01.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-17.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 30 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
13.01.2026
Present: Sh. J.V. Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff with plaintiff.
Sh. Jatin Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for all the defendants.
Matter is stage of arguments on application under order 39
rule 1 and 2 CPC.
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for defendants has filed an
application under order 8 rule 1 CPC seeking condonation of delay in
filing of WS. Copy supplied.
Perusal of record reveals that right of defendant to file reply
to the application under order 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC was closed vide order
dated 11.12.2025.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that the application filed
today is solely with the intent to delay the proceedings.
As the application under order 8 rule 1 CPC has been filed
today, this court deems it fit to decide the said application before
proceeding for arguments on application under order 39 rule 1 and 2
CPC.
Accordingly be put up for arguments on 17.01.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-13.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 34 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
07.01.2026
Present: Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is at the stage of arguments on the application u/o 39
Rule 1 & 2 CPC, however, Ld counsel for defendant submts that he
wishes to file WS alongwith appropriate application.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has vehemently opposed the
contention of the defendant.
Ld. Counsel for defendants seeks some time to address
arguments on the application u/o 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC.
Be put up for arguments on the application u/o 39 rule 1 &
2 CPC on 13.01.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-07.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 32 CS SCJ 252/24 Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
11.12.2025
Present: Sh. Ankit Sharma, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Matter is at the stage of filing of reply to the application under order 39 rule
1 and 2 CPC. However, none is present on behalf of the defendant. No reply has been
filed by the defendant. The same has been cross checked by the reader of this court from
the record register.
Accordingly, right to file reply to the application under order 39 rule 1 and 2
CPC stands closed.
However, the said application has to be decided on merits.
Be put up for arguments on the application under order 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC
for 07.01.2026.
The defendant is directed to appear on the NDOH, failing which, he shall be
proceeded Ex-parte.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-11.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 CS SCJ 252/24 Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
07.11.2025
Present: Sh. Ankit Sharma, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Defendant in person.
Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings/filing of WS.
Defendant submits that his counsel is not available today and has requested
for an adjournment. Adjournment granted and last opportunity is given to the defendant
to file WS along with appropriate application. Defendant is also directed to file the reply
to the application under order 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC.
List the matter for completion of pleadings/reply/arguments on the
application under order 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC on 11.12.2025.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-07.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
18.07.2025
Present: None for plaintiff.
Defendant in person.
Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings/filing of
WS.
Defendant submits that the copy of page no.30 as directed to
be supplied in view of order dated 08.04.2025 has been supplied to him
just 4 days before and he seeks time to file the WS. Time granted.
List the matter for abovesaid purpose on 07.11.2025.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts/18.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
08.04.2025
Present: Sh. Vikes Rathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Defendant in person.
Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings.
Defendant submits that he has not received the copy of
plaint.
Today, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has supplied copy of plaint
alongwith copy of documents to the defendant.
Defendant submits that page no.30 is not properly legible.
Plaintiff is directed to supply page no.30.
List the matter for completion of pleadings on 18.07.2025.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts/08.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
14.01.2025
Present: Sh. Ankit Dalal, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
Defendant in person.
Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings.
Defendant submits that he has not received the copy of
plaint and documents despite orders of the court on the LDOH. Plaintiff
is directed to supply the same within 15 days from today.
List the matter for completion of pleadings on 08.04.2025.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts/14.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
27.07.2024
VC is not working due to connectivity issue.
Present: Sh. Vikesh Rathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Defendant in person.
It is submitted that defendant has not received the complete
paper book of the suit. The plaintiff is directed to supply the same within
7 days whereafter, WS be filed within the time prescribed by law.
Now to come up for completion of pleadings/admission-
denial of documents/framing of issues on 05.10.2024.
(Shaina Goyal)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-27.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS NO. 252-2024
DINESH KUMAR DABAS VS. SURESH DABAS
20.02.2024
Fresh suit for permanent injunction received by way of
assignment. It be checked and registered.
Present: Sh. Pulkit Mittal, Proxy counsel for plaintiff.
Heard. Record perused.
Issue summons for settlement of issues and notice of
application u/o XXXIX rule 1 & 2 CPC to the defendant on filing
of PF & RC within one week returnable for 03.04.2024.
(Shaina Goyal)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-20.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
31.07.2026
Present: Sh. J.V. Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with the
plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Today replication has been filed along with affidavit of
admission/denial on behalf of the plaintiff. The same is objected by the
defendant being time barred.
Submissions heard.
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for defendant has filed an
application under order 11 rule 12, 14 and 15 CPC. Copy supplied. Let
reply if any be filed with advance copy to the opposite party.
Be put up for completion of pleadings and arguments on
application under order 11 rule 12, 14 and 15 CPC on 01.09.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge/N-W District
31.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 40 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
26.05.2026
This is parcha yadasht
Present: Plaintiff in person.
Sh. Jatin Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Ahlmad has informed that the present case file is
not traceable and seeks one week time to trace the same. Time
granted.
An affidavit for admission/denial has been filed on
behalf of the defendant. Copy supplied.
Ld. Counsel for defendant submits that he wishes to
address arguments on the maintainability of the suit.
List the matter for further proceedings on
31.07.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-26.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 36 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
14.03.2026
Matter taken up today as per the directions of Hon'ble High Court of
Delhi as 02.03.2026 was declared a holiday vide circular no.
64/G-4/Genl.I/DHC dated 27.02.2026.
Present: Sh. J. V. Rana Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Sh. Jatin Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for defendant alongwith
defendant.
Vide separate order on application under order 39 rule 1
and 2 CPC is disposed off.
Be put up for completion of pleadings/admission denial for
26.05.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-14.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 34 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
20.02.2026
Present: None for plaintiff.
Sh. Jatin Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for defendant alongwith
defendant.
In between the dates of hearing, certain documents and case
laws were filed on behalf of the plaintiff in support of his arguments on
the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.
Ld. Counsel for defendant submits that advance copy was
supplied to him and he has stated that the said document ie. notification
dated 16.05.2017 does not make any difference to his arguments.
Heard. Record perused.
Put up for clarification, if any/orders on 02.03.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-20.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 37 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
07.02.2026
Present: Sh. J.V. Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Jatin Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Arguments heard on the application under order 39 rule 1
and 2 CPC.
Documents have been filed by both the parties during the
course of arguments. Be taken on record. (the same has been objected by
the ld. counsel for the defendant) Copy be supplied.
Be put up for clarifications if any/orders on 20.02.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-07.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 39 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
05.02.2026
Present: Sh. J.V. Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh.Jatin Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Today, an application seeking waiver of cost has been filed
on behalf of the defendant. Copy supplied. Contents of the application
perused.
Submissions heard.
Perusal reveals that cost was imposed on the defendant on
the last date of hearing while providing opportunity to file WS after
delay.
In view of this court, no sufficient ground has been brought
forward to consider the present application seeking waiver.
Accordingly, the application in hand is dismissed and disposed off.
Cost paid.
Copy of WS has been supplied today to the plaintiff,
however, directions were to supply an advance copy.
Ld. Counsel for defendant seeks time to advance arguments
on application under order 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC.
One last opportunity is granted to the defendant to address
arguments of the application.
Be put up for arguments on application under order 39 rule
1 and 2 CPC 07.02.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-05.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 40 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
17.01.2026
Present: Sh. J.V. Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Jatin Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Arguments heard on application under order 8 rule 1 CPC.
Be put up for clarifications if any/orders on 22.01.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-17.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 30 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
13.01.2026
Present: Sh. J.V. Rana, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff with plaintiff.
Sh. Jatin Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for all the defendants.
Matter is stage of arguments on application under order 39
rule 1 and 2 CPC.
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for defendants has filed an
application under order 8 rule 1 CPC seeking condonation of delay in
filing of WS. Copy supplied.
Perusal of record reveals that right of defendant to file reply
to the application under order 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC was closed vide order
dated 11.12.2025.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that the application filed
today is solely with the intent to delay the proceedings.
As the application under order 8 rule 1 CPC has been filed
today, this court deems it fit to decide the said application before
proceeding for arguments on application under order 39 rule 1 and 2
CPC.
Accordingly be put up for arguments on 17.01.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-13.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 34 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
07.01.2026
Present: Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is at the stage of arguments on the application u/o 39
Rule 1 & 2 CPC, however, Ld counsel for defendant submts that he
wishes to file WS alongwith appropriate application.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has vehemently opposed the
contention of the defendant.
Ld. Counsel for defendants seeks some time to address
arguments on the application u/o 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC.
Be put up for arguments on the application u/o 39 rule 1 &
2 CPC on 13.01.2026.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-07.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 32 CS SCJ 252/24 Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
11.12.2025
Present: Sh. Ankit Sharma, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Matter is at the stage of filing of reply to the application under order 39 rule
1 and 2 CPC. However, none is present on behalf of the defendant. No reply has been
filed by the defendant. The same has been cross checked by the reader of this court from
the record register.
Accordingly, right to file reply to the application under order 39 rule 1 and 2
CPC stands closed.
However, the said application has to be decided on merits.
Be put up for arguments on the application under order 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC
for 07.01.2026.
The defendant is directed to appear on the NDOH, failing which, he shall be
proceeded Ex-parte.
(Vaibhav Kumar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-11.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 CS SCJ 252/24 Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
07.11.2025
Present: Sh. Ankit Sharma, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Defendant in person.
Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings/filing of WS.
Defendant submits that his counsel is not available today and has requested
for an adjournment. Adjournment granted and last opportunity is given to the defendant
to file WS along with appropriate application. Defendant is also directed to file the reply
to the application under order 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC.
List the matter for completion of pleadings/reply/arguments on the
application under order 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC on 11.12.2025.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-07.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
18.07.2025
Present: None for plaintiff.
Defendant in person.
Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings/filing of
WS.
Defendant submits that the copy of page no.30 as directed to
be supplied in view of order dated 08.04.2025 has been supplied to him
just 4 days before and he seeks time to file the WS. Time granted.
List the matter for abovesaid purpose on 07.11.2025.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts/18.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
08.04.2025
Present: Sh. Vikes Rathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Defendant in person.
Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings.
Defendant submits that he has not received the copy of
plaint.
Today, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has supplied copy of plaint
alongwith copy of documents to the defendant.
Defendant submits that page no.30 is not properly legible.
Plaintiff is directed to supply page no.30.
List the matter for completion of pleadings on 18.07.2025.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts/08.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
14.01.2025
Present: Sh. Ankit Dalal, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
Defendant in person.
Matter is at the stage of completion of pleadings.
Defendant submits that he has not received the copy of
plaint and documents despite orders of the court on the LDOH. Plaintiff
is directed to supply the same within 15 days from today.
List the matter for completion of pleadings on 08.04.2025.
(Arjun Kirar)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts/14.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14 CS SCJ 252/24
Dinesh Kumar Dabas Vs. Suresh Dabas
27.07.2024
VC is not working due to connectivity issue.
Present: Sh. Vikesh Rathi, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Defendant in person.
It is submitted that defendant has not received the complete
paper book of the suit. The plaintiff is directed to supply the same within
7 days whereafter, WS be filed within the time prescribed by law.
Now to come up for completion of pleadings/admission-
denial of documents/framing of issues on 05.10.2024.
(Shaina Goyal)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-27.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS NO. 252-2024
DINESH KUMAR DABAS VS. SURESH DABAS
20.02.2024
Fresh suit for permanent injunction received by way of
assignment. It be checked and registered.
Present: Sh. Pulkit Mittal, Proxy counsel for plaintiff.
Heard. Record perused.
Issue summons for settlement of issues and notice of
application u/o XXXIX rule 1 & 2 CPC to the defendant on filing
of PF & RC within one week returnable for 03.04.2024.
(Shaina Goyal)
Civil Judge-N/W District
Rohini Courts-20.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --