Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 25 CS SCJ/218/2026 CNR No. DLNW03-0003442026 SHRIOM RAJU AND OTHERS Vs. THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 11.08.2026 Present : Ms. Meenu Duggal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Naresh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 2 and 3(DDA and DJB) alongwith AE Rakesh Dahiya. Ms. Vasu Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant/MCD (through VC) (Fresh vakalatnama filed). Part argument heard on the maintainability from the side of plaintiff. It is submitted by the…
SHRIOM RAJU AND OTHERS +22 moreVsThe Govt of NCT of Delhi +3 more
TrustJury record updated 21 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 218/2026
- Registration Date
- 12 Feb 2026
- Next Hearing Date
- 22 Dec 2026
- Case Stage
- Misc. Argument
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
27Petitioner
- 1SHRIOM RAJU AND OTHERS
- 2ADITYA SHARMA
- 3VAIBHAV WADHWA
- 4VIKAS CHUGH
- 5SANJAY JAIN
- 6D L BAJAJ
- 7Beant Singh
- 8Roshan Kumar Sharma
- 9R. S. WADHWA
- 10Rahul bhardwaj
- 11JITENDER KAPOOR
- 12NEELAM CHUGH
- 13HARJOT SINGH BAWA
- 14GIANCHAND
- 15S. P. ARORA
- 16GURBAKSH SINGH
- 17M.L. WATSON
- 18KAPTAIN SINGH
- 19Dr. PARMOD VERMA
- 20KISHAN KUMAR
- 21PRIYANSHU ARORA
- 22VIVEK SINGH
- 23NEET SINGH
Acts & Sections
1Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 12-02-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 24-02-2026 Date: 24-02-2026 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc. Argument Next Hearing Date: 28-02-2026 Date: 28-02-2026 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc. Argument Next Hearing Date: 17-03-2026 Date: 17-03-2026 Business: Ld. P.O. is on half day leave (F/N) today. Next Purpose: Misc. Argument Next Hearing Date: 09-06-2026 Date: 09-06-2026 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc. Argument Next Hearing Date: 11-08-2026 Date: 11-08-2026 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc. Argument Next Hearing Date: 09-10-2026 Date: 09-10-2026 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc. Argument Next Hearing Date: 22-12-2026
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 349/2026 Filing Date: 12-02-2026 eFiling Number: ADL20230006140C202600006 eFiling Date: 12-02-2026 First Hearing Date: 12th February 2026 Court Number And Judge: 531-Senior Civil Judge Cum Rent Controller
Orders
12Interim Order 609 Oct 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 19 CS SCJ/218/2026 CNR No. DLNW03-0003442026 SHRIOM RAJU AND OTHERS Vs. THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 09.10.2026 Present : Ms. Meenu Duggal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC. Sh. Naresh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.2/DDA and defendant no.3/DJB through VC. Ms. Vasu Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant/MCD through VC. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has submitted that she has received the copy of application u/o 1 rule 10 CPC last evening only. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff seeks adjournment for reply and arguments. At request, matter is adjourned for reply and arguments on aforesaid application on 22.12.2026. (Mayank Mittal) SCJ-cum-RC, North-West, Rohini Courts, Delhi/09.10.2026(m) -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 409 Jun 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 27 CS SCJ 218/26 SHRIOM RAJU AND OTHERS Vs. THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 09.06.2026 Present : Mrs. Meenu Duggal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Naresh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 2 and 3/DDA and DJB. Ms. Vasu Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant/MCD. Part arguments heard on application u/o 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC. It is submitted by the counsel for the defendants that court needs to hear submission on maintainability of the present suit first. Part submission heard on maintainability. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has filed the case law in support of her contentions. Be put up for further arguments on maintainability on 11.08.2026. (Mayank Mittal) SCJ-cum-RC, North-West, Rohini Courts, Delhi/09.06.2026(u) -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 20 CS SCJ 218/26 SHRIOM RAJU AND OTHERS Vs. THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 28.02.2026 Present : Ms. Meenu Duggal, Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff. Sh. Naresh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for Defendant no.2/DJB and defendant no.3/DDA alongwith Sh. Rakesh Dahiya, AE, DJB. Part submissions heard. At the request of Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff, matter is passed over for 11:10 am. (Mayank Mittal) SCJ-cum-RC, North-West, Rohini Courts, Delhi/28.02.2026 At 11:20 am Present :…
Interim Order 224 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 218/26 Shriom Raju & Anr. v. The Govt. NCT of Delhi & Ors. File is taken up on application for early hearing of the case filed on behalf of applicant/plaintiff. 24.02.2026 Present : Ms. Meenu Duggal, Ld. Counsel for applicant/plaintiff. Sh. Naresh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for both the defendants i.e. Delhi Jal Board and DDA through VC. It is submitted by the counsel for the defendant that he has not yet received the copy of plaint and documents annexed with the same. Ld. Counsel for applicant/plaintiff has filed a photocopy of receiving of summons on 13.02.2026 from the office of Vice Chairman, Delhi Jal Board. Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff has submitted that she will place an additional copy of plaint and documents on record at 02:00 pm. Defendant is at liberty to collect the copy of plaint and documents at 04:00 pm today itself. At the request of Ld. Counsel for defendant, matter is adjourned for filing reply to application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 on 28.02.2026. (Mayank Mittal) SCJ-cum-RC, North-West, Rohini Courts, Delhi/24.02.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 218/26 SHRIOM RAJU & ORS. V. THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI 12.02.2026 Present : Ms. Meenu Duggal, Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff. The present matter was marked on the mentioning of Ld. Counsel for plaintiff to the Court of Ld. ASCJ, however, Ld. ASCJ has observed that matter involved the issue of infrastructure, for which this Court is a designated Court. Let the matter be checked and registered as per…
Order 609 Oct 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 19 CS SCJ/218/2026 CNR No. DLNW03-0003442026 SHRIOM RAJU AND OTHERS Vs. THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 09.10.2026 Present : Ms. Meenu Duggal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC. Sh. Naresh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.2/DDA and defendant no.3/DJB through VC. Ms. Vasu Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant/MCD through VC. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has submitted that she has received the copy of application u/o 1 rule 10 CPC last evening only. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff seeks adjournment for reply and arguments. At request, matter is adjourned for reply and arguments on aforesaid application on 22.12.2026. (Mayank Mittal) SCJ-cum-RC, North-West, Rohini Courts, Delhi/09.10.2026(m) -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 25 CS SCJ/218/2026 CNR No. DLNW03-0003442026 SHRIOM RAJU AND OTHERS Vs. THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 11.08.2026 Present : Ms. Meenu Duggal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Naresh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 2 and 3(DDA and DJB) alongwith AE Rakesh Dahiya. Ms. Vasu Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant/MCD (through VC) (Fresh vakalatnama filed). Part argument heard on the maintainability from the side of plaintiff. It is submitted by the…
Order 409 Jun 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 27 CS SCJ 218/26 SHRIOM RAJU AND OTHERS Vs. THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 09.06.2026 Present : Mrs. Meenu Duggal, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Naresh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 2 and 3/DDA and DJB. Ms. Vasu Singh, Ld. Counsel for defendant/MCD. Part arguments heard on application u/o 39 rule 1 and 2 CPC. It is submitted by the counsel for the defendants that court needs to hear submission on maintainability of the present suit first. Part submission heard on maintainability. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has filed the case law in support of her contentions. Be put up for further arguments on maintainability on 11.08.2026. (Mayank Mittal) SCJ-cum-RC, North-West, Rohini Courts, Delhi/09.06.2026(u) -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 20 CS SCJ 218/26 SHRIOM RAJU AND OTHERS Vs. THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 28.02.2026 Present : Ms. Meenu Duggal, Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff. Sh. Naresh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for Defendant no.2/DJB and defendant no.3/DDA alongwith Sh. Rakesh Dahiya, AE, DJB. Part submissions heard. At the request of Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff, matter is passed over for 11:10 am. (Mayank Mittal) SCJ-cum-RC, North-West, Rohini Courts, Delhi/28.02.2026 At 11:20 am Present :…
Order 224 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 218/26 Shriom Raju & Anr. v. The Govt. NCT of Delhi & Ors. File is taken up on application for early hearing of the case filed on behalf of applicant/plaintiff. 24.02.2026 Present : Ms. Meenu Duggal, Ld. Counsel for applicant/plaintiff. Sh. Naresh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for both the defendants i.e. Delhi Jal Board and DDA through VC. It is submitted by the counsel for the defendant that he has not yet received the copy of plaint and documents annexed with the same. Ld. Counsel for applicant/plaintiff has filed a photocopy of receiving of summons on 13.02.2026 from the office of Vice Chairman, Delhi Jal Board. Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff has submitted that she will place an additional copy of plaint and documents on record at 02:00 pm. Defendant is at liberty to collect the copy of plaint and documents at 04:00 pm today itself. At the request of Ld. Counsel for defendant, matter is adjourned for filing reply to application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 on 28.02.2026. (Mayank Mittal) SCJ-cum-RC, North-West, Rohini Courts, Delhi/24.02.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS SCJ 218/26 SHRIOM RAJU & ORS. V. THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI 12.02.2026 Present : Ms. Meenu Duggal, Ld. Counsel for Plaintiff. The present matter was marked on the mentioning of Ld. Counsel for plaintiff to the Court of Ld. ASCJ, however, Ld. ASCJ has observed that matter involved the issue of infrastructure, for which this Court is a designated Court. Let the matter be checked and registered as per…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
