Full Order Text
Order 3 · 01 Jul 2026 · CNR DLNW030001732026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 20 CS SCJ 117/26 RAJ KUMAR SINGH Vs. SANTOSH 01.07.2026 Present: Sh. Sachin Vats, Ld. LAC for the plaintiff alongwith plaintiff. Sh. Shubham Kumar Gupta, Proxy Counsel for defendant. Proxy Counsel for defendant submits that the main counsel is not available today. Replication has been filed alongwith reply to the application u/o VIII Rule 1 CPC and application u/o VII Rule 11 CPC. Be taken on record. Submissions heard on the application. It is stated in the application that the defendant was not aware about the proceedings and he only came to know about the matter on 02.03.2026, on which he contacted his counsel and there was a delay of 25 days in filing of WS. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has opposed the said application stating that the defendant has made up a story and no plausible reason has been mentioned for the delay. He has argued that even the date of service of summons has not been mentioned in the application. Heard. Record perused. Perusal reveals that the defendant was served on 04.02.2026 and the WS has been filed within 30 days on 09.04.2026. However, in order to adjudicate the matter on merits and in the interst of justice, the delay is condoned subject to cost of Rs.1,000/- to be deposited in DLSA, Rohini Courts, Delhi. WS is taken on record. Be put up for arguments on an application u/o VII Rule 11 CPC on 25.08.2026. (Vaibhav Kumar) Civil Judge-N/W District Rohini Courts-01.07.2026 -- 1 of 1 --