Order 4

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 CC NI ACT / 2926/2025 AJAY VERMA Vs. MEGH PRAKASH AND
ORS /0 (Maurya Enclave)
28.09.2026
Undersigned is having pendency of approximately 7600 cases in
this court.
Today, Undersigned is also working as Link
JMFC.
Present: Complainant in person with ld counsel Sh. R. K.
Dahiya.
Ld counsel has filed the MCA certificate. Moreover,
ld counsel for ocmplainat submitted that CA of the complainant
stated that the form 32 is not available. Therefore, complainant is
not able to file the same.
Today, the matter was fixed for consideration.
Ld. Counsel for the complainant has advanced his
submissions and has presented the case.
It is pertinent to mention that as per the judgment of
Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sanjabig Tari Vs. Kishore
S. Borcar & Anr. Criminal Appeal No. 1755/2020, it was held that
there is no need to issue the notice to the accused at the pre-
cognizance.
Arguments on summoning heard.
I have gone through the entire record including the
complaint and the documents. It is alleged that accused has
executed the cheque in question in favour of the complainant to
discharge the liability and the said cheque was dishonored on the
due date. Therefore, demand notice was sent to the accused by the
complainant. Despite service/ deemed service of said notice,
accused has failed to make the payment as per provisions of
Negotiable Instruments Act.
-- 1 of 1 --