Full Order Text
Interim Order 5 · 28 Sept 2026 · CNR DLNW020901532025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Complaint is filed within the prescribed period of limitation. In my considered opinion, prima facie there is sufficient material available on record to summon the accused. The Ld. counsel for the complainant requests that the pre-summoning may be carried out in absence of AR of the complainant in terms of the dictum of A. C . Narayanan judgment. He further submits that dictum of A.C. Narayanan is also applicable to complaints u/s 138 NI Act. In matter of “A. C. Narayanan Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr.” (2014) 11 SCC 790, Full Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has held that “...it is a matter of discretion and the Magistrate is not bound to call upon the complainant to remain present before the court and to examine him upon oath for taking decision whether or not to issue process on the complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act. For the purpose of issuing process under Section 200 of the Code, it is open to the Magistrate to rely upon the verification in the form of affidavit filed by the complainant in support of the complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act...” Complaint, affidavit of evidence and documents considered in light of above cited judgment. In opinion of this Court, there is no need to examine the complainant's evidence for purpose of issuance of process. In view of complaint, documents produced and verification in the form of affidavit of evidence, there are sufficient grounds for proceeding further against accused for offence punishable under Section 138 NI Act. Hence, accused be summoned through all modes for offence u/s 138 Negotiable instrument Act read with section 142 NI Act on filing of PF/RC. In the event the house/office/premises is found to be locked/refusal to accept the service/any other contingency the process be served through affixation. PF be filed within fifteen working days. As per the guidelines laid down as in the case titled as “Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H”, AIR2010(SC) 1907”, Ahlmad is directed to make a mention on the summons issued against the accused (by adding separate sheet, if required) that -- 1 of 1 --
