RAJ KUMARVsDEVENDER KUMAR JAIN

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 81 CC NI ACT / 4115/2024
Raj Kumar Vs. Devender Kumar Jain
(Maurya Enclave)
06.06.2026
Present: Sh. Harshil Gupta, Ld. Counsel for complainant
through VC.
Accused is absent despite service.	Accused is absent despite service.
It appears that the accused is deliberately avoiding the	It appears that the accused is deliberately avoiding the
process of Court.	process of Court.
Issue Bailable Warrants against the accused in the	Issue Bailable Warrants against the accused in the
sum of Rs. 5,000/- with one surety of like amount returnable for	sum of Rs. 5,000/- with one surety of like amount returnable for
30.09.2026	30.09.2026..
(ABHINAV SINGH)
JMFC-01/NW/Rohini
06.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 82 CC NI ACT / 4115/2024
Raj Kumar Vs. Devender Kumar Jain
PS (Maurya Enclave)
14.01.2026
Present: Sh. Chirag Jain, Ld. Counsel for complainant through
video conferencing.
Report on summons qua accused not received back.
Issue fresh summons to the accused for 06.06.2026.
(ABHINAV SINGH)
JMFC-01/NW/Rohini
14.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 82CC NI ACT/4115/2024Raj Kumar Vs. Devender Kumar Jain/0 (Maurya Enclave)
23.09.2025
Ld. PO is on leave today.
Present: Sh. Harshil Gupta Counsel for the complainant.
Put up for purpose already fixed on 29.11.2025.
(Shraddha Tripathi)
(Link MM(NI) Digital Court02)
NorthWest, Rohini
New Delhi/23.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 32 CC NI ACT / 4115/2024 Raj Kumar Vs. Devender Kumar Jain /0 (Maurya
Enclave)
Proceedings conducted online through video conferencing using CISCO WEBEX
software.
20.03.2025
Present: Sh. Vasu Jain, Ld. Counsel for the complainant through VC.
None for proposed accused.
Report on court notice issued to proposed accused received back stating
that upon visiting the given address, son of the proposed accused Vishal Jain was
found who accepted the court notice on behalf of the proposed accused.
None appeared for the proposed accused despite repeated calls.
Last and final opportunity is granted to the proposed accused to enter
appearance and advance arguments on summoning.
Put up for argument on the point of summoning on 17.05.2025.
(Parul Sharma)
(JMFC(NI Act) Digital court02)
NorthWest, Rohini
New Delhi/20.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 31 CC NI ACT / 4115/2024 Raj Kumar Vs. Devender Kumar Jain /0 (Maurya
Enclave)
Proceedings conducted online through video conferencing using CISCO WEBEX
software.
05.12.2024
Present: Ms. Anshika Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the complainant alongwith
complainant through VC.
Original file received.
In terms of provision of BNSS, let court notice be issued to proposed
accused to afford an opportunity of hearing, returnable for NDOH.
In case of refusal/premises found locked and upon proper verification as
to the said address of accused, let the court notice be served through affixation and
pictures be annexed alongwith the report. Process server is directed to annex the
proof of service alongwith the report.
Ld. Counsel for the complainant also submits that he/she will get the
court notice served upon the proposed accused either physically/electronically. Let the
same be done upon appropriate affidavit of service. At request, copy of the court
notice be also given as dasti at least one month before NDOH.
Put up for consideration on 20.03.2025.
(Parul Sharma)
(JMFC(NI Act) Digital court02)
NorthWest, Rohini
New Delhi/05.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 20 CC NI ACT / 4115/2024
Raj Kumar Vs. Devender Kumar Jain
PS (Maurya Enclave)
30.09.2026
Present: Sh. Harshal Gupta, Ld. Counsel for complainant.
Son of accused in person.
Oral exemption prayed on behalf of accused on
medical grounds. Heard upon the same. In view of the
submissions, the same is allowed for today only.
It is submitted that the accused is ready and willing to
pay the cheque amount of RS. 1,60,000/- to the complainant
within 6 months, and that parties have already reached and
understanding regarding the same.
Put up for verification of payment/ further
proceedings on 01.12.2026.
(ABHINAV SINGH)
JMFC-01/NW/Rohini
30.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 81 CC NI ACT / 4115/2024
Raj Kumar Vs. Devender Kumar Jain
(Maurya Enclave)
06.06.2026
Present: Sh. Harshil Gupta, Ld. Counsel for complainant
through VC.
Accused is absent despite service.	Accused is absent despite service.
It appears that the accused is deliberately avoiding the	It appears that the accused is deliberately avoiding the
process of Court.	process of Court.
Issue Bailable Warrants against the accused in the	Issue Bailable Warrants against the accused in the
sum of Rs. 5,000/- with one surety of like amount returnable for	sum of Rs. 5,000/- with one surety of like amount returnable for
30.09.2026	30.09.2026..
(ABHINAV SINGH)
JMFC-01/NW/Rohini
06.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 82 CC NI ACT / 4115/2024
Raj Kumar Vs. Devender Kumar Jain
PS (Maurya Enclave)
14.01.2026
Present: Sh. Chirag Jain, Ld. Counsel for complainant through
video conferencing.
Report on summons qua accused not received back.
Issue fresh summons to the accused for 06.06.2026.
(ABHINAV SINGH)
JMFC-01/NW/Rohini
14.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 82CC NI ACT/4115/2024Raj Kumar Vs. Devender Kumar Jain/0 (Maurya Enclave)
23.09.2025
Ld. PO is on leave today.
Present: Sh. Harshil Gupta Counsel for the complainant.
Put up for purpose already fixed on 29.11.2025.
(Shraddha Tripathi)
(Link MM(NI) Digital Court02)
NorthWest, Rohini
New Delhi/23.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 32 CC NI ACT / 4115/2024 Raj Kumar Vs. Devender Kumar Jain /0 (Maurya
Enclave)
Proceedings conducted online through video conferencing using CISCO WEBEX
software.
20.03.2025
Present: Sh. Vasu Jain, Ld. Counsel for the complainant through VC.
None for proposed accused.
Report on court notice issued to proposed accused received back stating
that upon visiting the given address, son of the proposed accused Vishal Jain was
found who accepted the court notice on behalf of the proposed accused.
None appeared for the proposed accused despite repeated calls.
Last and final opportunity is granted to the proposed accused to enter
appearance and advance arguments on summoning.
Put up for argument on the point of summoning on 17.05.2025.
(Parul Sharma)
(JMFC(NI Act) Digital court02)
NorthWest, Rohini
New Delhi/20.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 31 CC NI ACT / 4115/2024 Raj Kumar Vs. Devender Kumar Jain /0 (Maurya
Enclave)
Proceedings conducted online through video conferencing using CISCO WEBEX
software.
05.12.2024
Present: Ms. Anshika Aggarwal, Ld. Counsel for the complainant alongwith
complainant through VC.
Original file received.
In terms of provision of BNSS, let court notice be issued to proposed
accused to afford an opportunity of hearing, returnable for NDOH.
In case of refusal/premises found locked and upon proper verification as
to the said address of accused, let the court notice be served through affixation and
pictures be annexed alongwith the report. Process server is directed to annex the
proof of service alongwith the report.
Ld. Counsel for the complainant also submits that he/she will get the
court notice served upon the proposed accused either physically/electronically. Let the
same be done upon appropriate affidavit of service. At request, copy of the court
notice be also given as dasti at least one month before NDOH.
Put up for consideration on 20.03.2025.
(Parul Sharma)
(JMFC(NI Act) Digital court02)
NorthWest, Rohini
New Delhi/05.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --